Schuylaar's Sesh - Why Republicans Should Eat Shit and Die..

[Rob Roy]

there cannot be money or religion in politics..once a senator/representative no longer benefits financially, they simply become you and i..desk jockeys, pencil pushers and bean counters.

Believing that you can move the furniture around and it will fix the leaky roof leads me to think you still put your teeth under your pillow hoping for a quarter from nanny.

Politics nature is to set people against one another, but keep polishing that turd maybe it will become a diamond if you eat enough government cheese.

 

[Doer]

Your wife isn't liberal?

My brother is head of the Clinic Psychiatric Dept at a big city VA.

I assure you most therapists are liberal. It is the same as journalism. It attract the type.

 

[CaretakerDad]

there are no liberal therapists.

I am fairly certain that only conservatives are Therapists.........excuse my typo......The rapists.

 

[Doer]

So, only conservatives are rapists?

 

[Dr Kynes]

I am fairly certain that only conservatives are Therapists.........excuse my typo......The rapists.

well played.

benny hill has been running that gag since his vaudeville days.

reality however demonstrates that the humanities (including psychology) attracts people of a liberal bent

thats why my Conservative Poetry Reading And Spoken Word Drum Circles are so poorly attended.

 

[Ceepea]

well played.

benny hill has been running that gag since his vaudeville days.

reality however demonstrates that the humanities (including psychology) attracts people of a liberal bent

thats why my Conservative Poetry Reading And Spoken Word Drum Circles are so poorly attended.

Psychology can be both a science or art, depending on where you study, FYI.

EDIT: But yes, positions that are focused on helping people seem to draw in liberals as opposed to conservatives.

 

[Dr Kynes]

Psychology can be both a science or art, depending on where you study, FYI.

EDIT: But yes, positions that are focused on helping people seem to draw in liberals as opposed to conservatives.

psychology is never a science, and it doesnt help anybody.

Psychiatry is a science, and you have to get an MD to study that shit.

psychology is a fallback solution for those who dont have the math for an MBA

 

[Ceepea]

psychology is never a science, and it doesnt help anybody.

Psychiatry is a science, and you have to get an MD to study that shit.

psychology is a fallback solution for those who dont have the math for an MBA

That is just ignorant as fuck.

Psychologists use fMRI, EMG, PET, CT and various other scans to gather quantitative data. The only thing psychiatrists can do that psychologists can't, is prescribe meds... lol Lots of psychology delves well into the realm of neuroscience, FYI neuroscientists can't prescribe meds either... guess they're useless and don't help anyone either. Some psych is qualitative, but your statements are just retarded.

 

[Doer]

And a Doctorate in Clinical Psychology?

There is real and there is Popular. Big diff.

 

[ginwilly]

Psychology can be both a science or art, depending on where you study, FYI.

EDIT: But yes, positions that are focused on helping people seem to draw in liberals as opposed to conservatives.

More libertarian than conservative here, but you will find the soft sciences of healthcare like sociology and psychology attract liberals, the hard sciences of healthcare like nursing and doctors, especially the specialized fields is mostly conservatives. Research draws mostly conservatives also.

Speaking solely from decades of experience, most of us in healthcare were non-political until Obamacare. When your life is so directly affected, you pay attention. When you choose a field to help people every day and are told that you are greedy and will chop off a foot to make some extra cash by a certain party, you tend to flee from that party. When you are told by a group of people that you have no right to charge for your time, your equipment, your intellectual property and that you now have to practice according to a cookbook put together by academia instead of actual practitioners, you tend to resent the party that did that.

So I disagree with your assertion. I think it would be more accurate to say those disciplines that focus on feelings draw in libs, the disciplines that focus on hard science draw in conservatives. How many liberal doctors have you met?

Somehow I get the feeling you not only don't work in healthcare, you don't talk to many who do.

 

[ginwilly]

That is just ignorant as fuck.

Psychologists use fMRI, EMG, PET, CT and various other scans to gather quantitative data. The only thing psychiatrists can do that psychologists can't, is prescribe meds... lol Lots of psychology delves well into the realm of neuroscience, FYI neuroscientists can't prescribe meds either... guess they're useless and don't help anyone either. Some psych is qualitative, but your statements are just retarded.

A neurologist can prescribe drugs, a neurosurgeon can prescribe drugs, a neurophysiologist can prescribe drugs. A neuroscientist who is concerned with research will not have patient contact, so there is no need to prescribe drugs, but their license would allow it if they have a medical doctorate. Where did you get that from?

 

[Ceepea]

A neurologist can prescribe drugs, a neurosurgeon can prescribe drugs, a neurophysiologist can prescribe drugs. A neuroscientist who is concerned with research will not have patient contact, so there is no need to prescribe drugs, but their license would allow it. Where did you get that from?

Getting a phD in neurscience doesn't allow you to prescribe drugs. I was very specific to say neuroscientist, not neurologist. For example, Sam Harris is a Dr. of Neuroscience, but has no medical degree, and thus cannot prescribe drugs.

I'm Canadian, so I speak from my perspective. Obviously you don't think it fits the American medical system. lol

 

[CaretakerDad]

More libertarian than conservative here, but you will find the soft sciences of healthcare like sociology and psychology attract liberals, the hard sciences of healthcare like nursing and doctors, especially the specialized fields is mostly conservatives. Research draws mostly conservatives also.

Speaking solely from decades of experience, most of us in healthcare were non-political until Obamacare. When your life is so directly affected, you pay attention. When you choose a field to help people every day and are told that you are greedy and will chop off a foot to make some extra cash by a certain party, you tend to flee from that party. When you are told by a group of people that you have no right to charge for your time, your equipment, your intellectual property and that you now have to practice according to a cookbook put together by academia instead of actual practitioners, you tend to resent the party that did that.

So I disagree with your assertion. I think it would be more accurate to say those disciplines that focus on feelings draw in libs, the disciplines that focus on hard science draw in conservatives. How many liberal doctors have you met?

Somehow I get the feeling you not only don't work in healthcare, you don't talk to many who do.

That shits pretty funny considering the stance and opinion of most conservatives regarding everything from creationism, to basic female physiology, to anthropogenic climate change denying.

 

[ginwilly]

Getting a phD in neurscience doesn't allow you to prescribe drugs. Sam Harris is a Dr. of Neuroscience, but has no medical degree, and thus cannot prescribe drugs.

I'm Canadian, so I speak from my perspective. Obviously you don't think it fits the American medical system. lol

A phD is not the same as MD or DO. You can get a phD in home ec, so no, that doesn't mean you can prescribe drugs. Sam Harris is NOT a medical doctor. He's a doctor like your professor of history is a doctor. He has a doctorate, not a medical license, so you are correct in that he can't prescribe drugs. His field of study is a derivative of psychology yet he is not a practitioner. The dude is a philosopher.

So I'll give you that one, a neuroscientist can not prescribe drugs unless his degree is in medicine.

 

[ginwilly]

That shits pretty funny considering the stance and opinion of most conservatives regarding everything from creationism, to basic female physiology, to anthropogenic climate change denying.

I refuse to fall for group think.

I think you have no clue what MOST conservatives opinions are, you are like MOST liberals who assign a trait to everyone in a group based on what you are told. How bout that for stereotyping?

How many liberal doctors do you know that are practicing? How many doctors do you know have little knowledge of female physiology? How many doctors do you know their opinions of AGGW? You are just spouting off what some of the idiots that have a microphone and camera say but have nothing to do with the medical field. Yet you assigned those traits from the idiots to the people who work in healthcare. Can you understand why they are running from the liberal movement and refuse to be associated with people who think like you?

A doctor will try everything in their power to save a foot with diabetic ulcers, saying they would have it cut off for profit is sickening. Obama said that as well as all a kid with asthma needs is a breathalyzer. Should the assumption be that most liberals are idiots then?

 

[UncleBuck]

More libertarian than conservative here, but you will find the soft sciences of healthcare like sociology and psychology attract liberals, the hard sciences of healthcare like nursing and doctors, especially the specialized fields is mostly conservatives. Research draws mostly conservatives also.

you are an idiot.

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1829428/

RESULTS
Among these medical students, 5% self-characterized as politically very conservative, 21% conservative, 33%moderate, 31% liberal, and 9% as very liberal.” Being male, white, Protestant, intending to specialize in Surgery or anesthesiology/pathology/radiology, or currently or previously being married significantly (P

≤

.001) increased the likelihood that a student self-identified as very conservative or conservative. Disagreement or strong disagreement with the statements, “I’m glad I chose to become a physician” and “Access to care is a fundamental human right,” were also both associated with being very conservative or conservative. Being more liberal was reported by blacks and Hispanics; those intending to become ob-gyns, psychiatrists, and pediatric subspecialists; and atheists, Jews, and adherents of eastern religions.

CONCLUSIONS
U.S. medical students are considerably more likely to be liberal than conservative and are more likely to be liberal than are other young U.S. adults. Future U.S. physicians may be more receptive to liberal messages than conservative ones, and their political orientation may profoundly affect their health system attitudes.

 

[schuylaar]

I refuse to fall for group think.

I think you have no clue what MOST conservatives opinions are, you are like MOST liberals who assign a trait to everyone in a group based on what you are told. How bout that for stereotyping?

How many liberal doctors do you know that are practicing? How many doctors do you know have little knowledge of female physiology? How many doctors do you know their opinions of AGGW? You are just spouting off what some of the idiots that have a microphone and camera say but have nothing to do with the medical field. Yet you assigned those traits from the idiots to the people who work in healthcare. Can you understand why they are running from the liberal movement and refuse to be associated with people who think like you?

A doctor will try everything in their power to save a foot with diabetic ulcers, saying they would have it cut off for profit is sickening. Obama said that as well as all a kid with asthma needs is a breathalyzer. Should the assumption be that most liberals are idiots then?

um, excuse me GW..but you completely glossed over my response to you regarding why the bill was killed and now that you know it was the republicans fault it's nothing but crickets.

bucky was right about you.

 

[ginwilly]

you are an idiot.

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1829428/

RESULTS
Among these medical students, 5% self-characterized as politically very conservative, 21% conservative, 33%moderate, 31% liberal, and 9% as very liberal.” Being male, white, Protestant, intending to specialize in Surgery or anesthesiology/pathology/radiology, or currently or previously being married significantly (P

≤

.001) increased the likelihood that a student self-identified as very conservative or conservative. Disagreement or strong disagreement with the statements, “I’m glad I chose to become a physician” and “Access to care is a fundamental human right,” were also both associated with being very conservative or conservative. Being more liberal was reported by blacks and Hispanics; those intending to become ob-gyns, psychiatrists, and pediatric subspecialists; and atheists, Jews, and adherents of eastern religions.

CONCLUSIONS
U.S. medical students are considerably more likely to be liberal than conservative and are more likely to be liberal than are other young U.S. adults. Future U.S. physicians may be more receptive to liberal messages than conservative ones, and their political orientation may profoundly affect their health system attitudes.

You are an idiot if you think a sampling of teenage or young twenty-something students represents the practicing adults.

The study could have said most STUDENTS are liberal and saved time. It's from 10 years ago when identifying as libertarian was nearly non-existent so that choice was not even given. It was also a voluntary study where more students than not neglected to participate. Of the students who voluntarily give time to a study like this, who would be more likely to participate? Wouldn't you think liberal?

Now show me a study between hard science and soft science political leanings, you know, because that's what we were talking about.

 

[ginwilly]

um, excuse me GW..but you completely glossed over my response to you regarding why the bill was killed and now that you know it was the republicans fault it's nothing but crickets.

bucky was right about you.

Sorry sky but i was pointing out the bill was not even allowed to be brought up for vote. That was purely for political reasons by dems. You claim it was because they added a rider that dems didn't agree with. So is that how you want our government run? Only bring bills forward that the Majority Leader agrees with? Then why not bring it to the floor and crush it? Simply for political reasons You see the shortcomings of the pubs but refuse to see your own party's.

I've never denied the shittyness of the present incarnation of the republican party. You've never admitted the shittyness of the present democratic party. It seems everyone is right about you. Maddow does it because it's her job, when you do it, it must be from lack of critical thinking.

Edit: I would like to add that I do agree with you that republicans should eat shit and die, and am remiss for not pointing that out. I just think the present class of dems should too.

Also, the problems with the VA are internal and have little to do with party. You trying to prove it's the republican's fault is exactly the stereotype people have of you.

 

[Dr Kynes]

That is just ignorant as fuck.

Psychologists use fMRI, EMG, PET, CT and various other scans to gather quantitative data. The only thing psychiatrists can do that psychologists can't, is prescribe meds... lol Lots of psychology delves well into the realm of neuroscience, FYI neuroscientists can't prescribe meds either... guess they're useless and don't help anyone either. Some psych is qualitative, but your statements are just retarded.

any asshole can use those devices if they have the scratch.

"food scientists" use em too, to isolate the perfect levels of umami for your potatoe crisps and hotpockets.

...

ohh sorry, lemme canada that up for you:

your gravy fries and tim hortons doughnuts.