Teacher fired for breaking up fight.

[UncleBuck]

I don't care to disassociate due to a persons race.

yet you keep on arguing in favor of white separatism, white supremacy, and you cite a white supremacist as your "historian".

i'm beginning to wonder if you're senile or retarded. it has to be one or the other by now.

 

[Rob Roy]

yet you keep on arguing in favor of white separatism, white supremacy, and you cite a white supremacist as your "historian".

i'm beginning to wonder if you're senile or retarded. it has to be one or the other by now.

I'm pretty sure Tom Woods is a Harvard and Columbia educated historian. Ahem, not that I give a shit, but those are northern Ivy League schools. Also, I don't believe he's a white supremacist, he does EXPOSE the racist positions Lincoln held though.

Do you think Lyndon B. Johnson was a racist? I'm willing to bet that old thieving pervert was. Figuratively you exhume his corpse and fellate it while writhing on a stack of Gerbil Times and your cat shit television is playing All in the Family reruns don't you? Admit it.

You are grasping at straws. I've never argued for white separatism, black separatism or anything other than every individual should have the right to determine the use of themselves and their property. You have consistently argued for a prohibitionist style enforcement of anti-property rights where a third party instructs two other parties how they will interact even if one or both parties do not want to interact. Forcing people to do things or harming them....isn't that what happened on the Candy plantation there Django?

Maybe the reason why you find it hard to understand is in the area of freedom concepts, your first thought is , "what does nanny say, is it okay with nanny, will I get a cookie if I lick nannies boots? I really like cookies, I could make my gerbil do lots of tricks for a cookie crumb.....nanny, nanny that man won't give me his stuff!! "

Also I'm becoming a little erm "indifferent" to exposing your cognitive failings here anymore. I think I'll go clean my room.

 

[UncleBuck]

I'm pretty sure Tom Woods is a Harvard and Columbia educated historian.

http://www.freecolorado.com/2009/04/meltdown-of-thomas-e-woods.html

The Meltdown of Thomas E. Woods

But then a friend pointed me to an article by Eric Muller blasting Woods as a "founding member" of the League of the South. Through archive.org, I found the web page that includes this claim in a biographical note. (I only wish this were an April Fool's joke.)

Another archived page notes that the League of the South "seeks to protect the historic Anglo-Celtic core culture of the South" and keep that culture from being displaced. The current web page notes that the group "reveres the tenets of our historic Christian faith and acknowledges its supremacy over man-made laws and opinions." The League "upholds the ontological or spiritual equality of all men before God and the bar of justice, while recognizing and rejoicing in the fact that is has neither been the will of God Almighty nor within the power of human legislation to make any two men mechanically equal." The group further believes that Southern culture is "structured upon the Biblical notion of hierarchy" and the "natural societal order of superiors and subordinates." The League of the South is thus racist and theocratic.

Forcing people to do things or harming them....isn't that what happened on the Candy plantation there Django?

now you're comparing having to serve blacks at your gas station to slavery.

get some fucking perspective.

and please do point me in the direction of thomas woods' defense of denial of service as totally not harmful.

 

[Rob Roy]

http://www.freecolorado.com/2009/04/meltdown-of-thomas-e-woods.html

The Meltdown of Thomas E. Woods

But then a friend pointed me to an article by Eric Muller blasting Woods as a "founding member" of the League of the South. Through archive.org, I found the web page that includes this claim in a biographical note. (I only wish this were an April Fool's joke.)

Another archived page notes that the League of the South "seeks to protect the historic Anglo-Celtic core culture of the South" and keep that culture from being displaced. The current web page notes that the group "reveres the tenets of our historic Christian faith and acknowledges its supremacy over man-made laws and opinions." The League "upholds the ontological or spiritual equality of all men before God and the bar of justice, while recognizing and rejoicing in the fact that is has neither been the will of God Almighty nor within the power of human legislation to make any two men mechanically equal." The group further believes that Southern culture is "structured upon the Biblical notion of hierarchy" and the "natural societal order of superiors and subordinates." The League of the South is thus racist and theocratic.





now you're comparing having to serve blacks at your gas station to slavery.

get some fucking perspective.

and please do point me in the direction of thomas woods' defense of denial of service as totally not harmful.

I think Thomas Woods thinking has evolved over the years. He used to be a "conservative" (whatever the fuck that means) and now he seems to be much more libertarian minded. So there is hope that a person that used to think government violence is a solution can amend their ways. Even for you there could be hope. If he's a libertarian his position would be he does not abide with the initiation of aggression. So your "historian" answer is self evident.

I don't own a gas station, but if I did your sorry ass would be handed a mop for obvious reasons.


When people are forced into situations that they don't want to be in and must use their body in ways they haven't chosen....you defend this form of bondage. So the comparison of a coercive government and slavery is valid because the METHOD is identical, one entity prevents another from exercising freedom of choice over themselves, EVEN when that person is not attemoting to control another or anothers property.


The fact that nanny lets you play in the yard now instead of keeping you in your room is hardly a refutation of the slave owner / slave model that is employed. It just means the plantation owner has given some people a travel pass.


Why do you advocate taking away a persons right to determine how they will use their own body ?

 

[UncleBuck]

I think Thomas Woods thinking has evolved over the years.

you think a lot of stupid things. the fact is that thomas woods was a founding member of a white supremacist group.

i'm still waiting for you to post his defense of denial of service to blacks as totally not harmful though. get to it, cupcake.

When people are forced into situations that they don't want to be in and must use their body in ways they haven't chosen....you defend this form of bondage.

it's a good thing that the decision to open a gas station or restaurant is completely voluntary and no one has ever been forced to open a gas station.

so much for your retarded "slavery" comparison that lacks all perspective whatsoever.

 

[Rob Roy]

you think a lot of stupid things. the fact is that thomas woods was a founding member of a white supremacist group.

i'm still waiting for you to post his defense of denial of service to blacks as totally not harmful though. get to it, cupcake.



it's a good thing that the decision to open a gas station or restaurant is completely voluntary and no one has ever been forced to open a gas station.

so much for your retarded "slavery" comparison that lacks all perspective whatsoever.

What would you call a person that is forced to labor for another?

What do you call people that take other peoples things or take control of other peoples property under threats of force? Thief and government

If Thomas Woods is a real libertarian, his denial is embodied in his philosophy. Real libertarians do not give government a pass to initiate aggression against a persons property. Try to follow along Dunce.

I'm getting a little indifferent to this conversation now and probably want to move on as kicking your ass is getting my arms tired and I gotta be ready for when Doer throws down his internet arm wrestling challenge again. So I'll summarize and move on.
We can fight lots more in other threads though okay sweety?



We both think people that discriminate based on race are dick wadds. You would punish them for their crimes of thought. I would not, until and only. if they left their property and onto anothers property and put their thoughts into action. You favor "thought crimes" Mr Nanny State.

You do not distinguish between an actionable harm and indifference.

You recognize when the KKK left their property and invaded other peoples property it was wrong. However you do not recognize there is a property invasion when a coercive government does the same thing as the KKK to private property owners. Nor do you see the force when a private person is instructed to labor in ways they prefer not to...slavish ain't it?

You like trying to tell other people what their position is and how to use their own property, including their body, which makes you a prohibitionist.

You extrapolate erroneously and often anybody that doesn't agree with your ideas is a racist. It's getting a little boring shining the lite in one of your ears and making shadow puppets as it exits the other, so yeah, I'm going to Wendy's to grab a bite to eat.

 

[UncleBuck]

What would you call a person that is forced to labor for another?

What do you call people that take other peoples things or take control of other peoples property under threats of force? Thief and government

If Thomas Woods is a real libertarian, his denial is embodied in his philosophy. Real libertarians do not give government a pass to initiate aggression against a persons property. Try to follow along Dunce.

I'm getting a little indifferent to this conversation now and probably want to move on as kicking your ass is getting my arms tired and I gotta be ready for when Doer throws down his internet arm wrestling challenge again. So I'll summarize and move on.
We can fight lots more in other threads though okay sweety?



We both think people that discriminate based on race are dick wadds. You would punish them for their crimes of thought. I would not, until and only. if they left their property and onto anothers property and put their thoughts into action. You favor "thought crimes" Mr Nanny State.

You do not distinguish between an actionable harm and indifference.

You recognize when the KKK left their property and invaded other peoples property it was wrong. However you do not recognize there is a property invasion when a coercive government does the same thing as the KKK to private property owners. Nor do you see the force when a private person is instructed to labor in ways they prefer not to...slavish ain't it?

You like trying to tell other people what their position is and how to use their own property, including their body, which makes you a prohibitionist.

You extrapolate erroneously and often anybody that doesn't agree with your ideas is a racist. It's getting a little boring shining the lite in one of your ears and making shadow puppets as it exits the other, so yeah, I'm going to Wendy's to grab a bite to eat.

it's a good thing no one is forced to open a gas station then.

you gonna show me where your white supremacist group founding buddy claims that denial of service didn't harm blacks?

 

[Rob Roy]

it's a good thing no one is forced to open a gas station then.

you gonna show me where your white supremacist group founding buddy claims that denial of service didn't harm blacks?

He's not my buddy. He's an individual and a "historian" That was your criteria, you said you wanted "just one".. You asked and received. Actually you demanded, which is a charaxcteristic of yours when your diaper is wet.

If he's truly a libertarian he would not agree with acts of initiated aggression against a private persons property, white, black or any other race by a coercive government. Like I said the last three times you failed to comprehend it is built into the philosophy....dunce.

It's a good thing people that own stuff get to use it and their bodies without some social engineers bringing guns into the conversation ....no wait.

I think it's time for you to admit you like the initiation of force for thought crimes comrade Josef.

 

[UncleBuck]

He's not my buddy. He's an individual and a "historian" That was your criteria, you said you wanted "just one".. You asked and received. Actually you demanded, which is a charaxcteristic of yours when your diaper is wet.

If he's truly a libertarian he would not agree with acts of initiated aggression against a private persons property, white, black or any other race by a coercive government. Like I said the last three times you failed to comprehend it is built into the philosophy....dunce.

It's a good thing people that own stuff get to use it and their bodies without some social engineers bringing guns into the conversation ....no wait.

I think it's time for you to admit you like the initiation of force for thought crimes comrade Josef.

so where does your white supremacist historian buddy say that denial of service to blacks caused no harm?

 

[sheskunk]

Do you think saggy pants, gold grills, Ebonics and gang violence cause blacks harm?

 

[UncleBuck]

Do you think saggy pants, gold grills, Ebonics and gang violence cause blacks harm?

if the pants are low enough, they might become a tripping hazard.

i just love the stereotypes you are trying to reinforce by the way. i guess when you weigh 730 pounds, you need to feel like someone is lower than you.

 

[sheskunk]

if the pants are low enough, they might become a tripping hazard.

i just love the stereotypes you are trying to reinforce by the way. i guess when you weigh 730 pounds, you need to feel like someone is lower than you.

Not really stereotypes when I witness them daily.

You don't think saggy pants, gold grills, Ebonics and gang violence cause blacks harm?

 

[UncleBuck]

Not really stereotypes when I witness them daily.

You don't think saggy pants, gold grills, Ebonics and gang violence cause blacks harm?

i witness fat white chicks doing the stupidest stuff daily too. yet i give you the benefit of the doubt and tend to believe you dress appropriately for your weight when going to walmart to stock up on junk food on your food stamp card.

 

[sheskunk]

i witness fat white chicks doing the stupidest stuff daily too. yet i give you the benefit of the doubt and tend to believe you dress appropriately for your weight when going to walmart to stock up on junk food on your food stamp card.

You don't think saggy pants, gold grills, Ebonics and gang violence cause blacks harm?

 

[UncleBuck]

You don't think saggy pants, gold grills, Ebonics and gang violence cause blacks harm?

why would speaking a certain way cause harm?

and isn't the definition of violence that it causes harm?

did the massive cheese curd clots finally give you a stroke or something?

 

[londonfog]

You don't think saggy pants, gold grills, Ebonics and gang violence cause blacks harm?

why would speaking a certain way cause harm?

and isn't the definition of violence that it causes harm?

did the massive cheese curd clots finally give you a stroke or something?

I think she likes you on wants you to hand feed her. just let her know you are happily married and can't afford to feed her. Hell no one can afford to feed her.

 

[sheskunk]

why would speaking a certain way cause harm?

and isn't the definition of violence that it causes harm?

did the massive cheese curd clots finally give you a stroke or something?

When you go to a job interview and lack proper grammar you tend not to get many call-backs. The same goes with your saggy pants and your gold grill. No job typically leads to poverty.

So can we agree that saggy pants, gold grills, Ebonics and gang violence cause blacks harm?

 

[UncleBuck]

I think she likes you on wants you to hand feed her. just let her know you are happily married and can't afford to feed her. Hell no one can afford to feed her.

hey london, as a black man, are you sagging your pants, wearing a gold grill, and speaking ebonics?

is sheskank accurate in her stereotypes of you?

 

[sheskunk]

I think she likes you on wants you to hand feed her. just let her know you are happily married and can't afford to feed her. Hell no one can afford to feed her.

Muppet.

 

[sheskunk]

hey london, as a black man, are you sagging your pants, wearing a gold grill, and speaking ebonics?

is sheskank accurate in her stereotypes of you?

So you deny this occurs?