Dr Kynes
Well-Known Member
if i went to germany with a convoluted scheme, tried to overthrow their government and died in the attempt, i would be part of GERMAN history, not the history of california.
you are reaching
A question for Libertarians.
- Thread starter MidwesternGro
- Start date
you are reaching
abandonconflict
Well-Known Member
Those racist quotes from Ron Paul's newsletter bear his signature and appear in his newsletter with Ron Paul credited as the author. In 1996, during a congressional campaign, in a CNN interview he did not deny that he was the author but said that the controversial content had been taken out of context.
It was not until 2001 that he denied writing the newsletters bearing his name and crediting himself as author. He received millions of dollars in profits from the newsletters at a peak of $940,000 per year.
Lew Rockwell is listed in the newsletter as a contributing editor. He was publicly implored by Ron Paul's former chief of staff to take credit for having written the controversial material for which Ron Paul received so much money. He also denied having written the incendiary racist material.
So we are to believe that Ron Paul read every single bill that came through congress entirely while ignoring the contents of the newsletters bearing his name and for which he was credited as author and for which he received millions in profits.
Even one of his personal aides, Renae Hathway, had this to say, "It was his newsletter, and it was under his name, so he always got to see the final product... He would proof it." She continued, "He was a hands-on boss. We had tons of subscribers, from all over the world... I never had one complaint about the content."
Yeah, I can see why he walked off the set during a later interview after he was asked about it.
It was not until 2001 that he denied writing the newsletters bearing his name and crediting himself as author. He received millions of dollars in profits from the newsletters at a peak of $940,000 per year.
Lew Rockwell is listed in the newsletter as a contributing editor. He was publicly implored by Ron Paul's former chief of staff to take credit for having written the controversial material for which Ron Paul received so much money. He also denied having written the incendiary racist material.
So we are to believe that Ron Paul read every single bill that came through congress entirely while ignoring the contents of the newsletters bearing his name and for which he was credited as author and for which he received millions in profits.
Even one of his personal aides, Renae Hathway, had this to say, "It was his newsletter, and it was under his name, so he always got to see the final product... He would proof it." She continued, "He was a hands-on boss. We had tons of subscribers, from all over the world... I never had one complaint about the content."
Yeah, I can see why he walked off the set during a later interview after he was asked about it.
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
Paul’s campaign wants to depict its candidate as a naïve, absentee overseer, with minimal knowledge of what his underlings were doing on his behalf. This portrayal might be more believable if extremist views had cropped up in the newsletters only sporadically--or if the newsletters had just been published for a short time. But it is difficult to imagine how Paul could allow material consistently saturated in racism, homophobia, anti-Semitism, and conspiracy-mongering to be printed under his name for so long if he did not share these views. In that respect, whether or not Paul personally wrote the most offensive passages is almost beside the point. If he disagreed with what was being written under his name, you would think that at some point--over the course of decades--he would have done something about it.
http://www.newrepublic.com/article/politics/angry-white-man
http://www.newrepublic.com/article/politics/angry-white-man
Rob Roy
Well-Known Member
You're barking up the wrong tree genius. That was a wheat / interstate commerce reference. Turn your racist alarm off Meathead Stivic and get the fuck out of Archies chair!!
Blacks don't need protection from me, I don't discriminate based on race. However I don't tell other people what they must do with their own property and their body. You do.
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
racial slurs and euphemism for white supremacy is more of your thing.
Rob Roy
Well-Known Member
No, you're wrong. I'm not a racist. I think a black person has the right to keep people he doesn't want out of his fast food operation.
Nobody should be forced to clean up shit with gerbil fur flecks in it....nobody.
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
sure thing, sweetheart.
mu·lat·to
m(y)o͝oˈlätō,-ˈlatō/
dated offensive
noun
noun: mulatto; plural noun: mulattoes; plural noun: mulattos
- a person of mixed white and black ancestry, especially a person with one white and one black parent.
kelly4
Well-Known Member
Great journalism. If the RP writings are just chock full of racist comments, how come they can only find one or 2 to take out of context in support of this claim? If its just SATURATED with racist comments then I would expect racism in every issue, the fact that only 1 or 2 passages could even remotely be racist out of the millions of pages printed, seems like like some liberals are sure mighty butt hurt about something.
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
i guess you didn't read the full article then.
greenlikemoney
Well-Known Member
Some?...LMFAO...only our resident LIAR.
desert dude
Well-Known Member
What do you have to offer that is a superior system? The past two hundred years ought to be pretty good evidence that capitalism makes every body richer.
abandonconflict
Well-Known Member
Nothing. Nothing would be a huge improvement. Nothing would save the world from the economy. I posit nothing.
The sooner the better.
Rob Roy
Well-Known Member
Is Obama of mixed race or can he magically become "black" when he wants to? Are you black because you have a scratched vinyl of Curtis Mayfield crooning out, "Super Fly" ? How does one self identify as a gerbil? Do they have to climb into your ass and pledge allegiance to Wendy's?
If a person is of mixed race and referred to as mulatto, is it offending their white or black heritage?
Also, you like to take things out context and ahem "self identify" them as "proof" of the smoking gun of racism you think you are a marksmen with. Way back when, you were constantly referring to Obama as "black", I pointed out he was of mixed race and said he was a mulatto. You got all word prohibitionist and nearly shit on the floor again. If it is a racial slur, I didn't mean it as one. Can I get a pat on the head from Reverend Jesse "Hymie Town" Jackson and be forgiven?
My knowing that Obama isn't black (as you think he is) doesn't make me a racist. I've pointed out dozens of times, that I think racists aren't very nice people, which of course has nothing to do with the point I've made in THIS thread, that ALL people should own their property and NO people should violate that.
I respect a racists right to control his own body and property, as long he isn't trying to control yours.
You shit on property that is not yours. Do you think floors self identify as toilets?
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
go out on the streets and find out, since it's so totally not racist.
write your local politician and urge him or her to call the president a "mulatto" like you do and see what kind of attention they get.
of just sit here and deny reality on the internet, like most deluded and cowardly racists tend to do.
Rob Roy
Well-Known Member
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
just like with most of what you say and do, the delusion is rampant.
NLXSK1
Well-Known Member
Who cares??
Libertarians want smaller government... Race and gender have nothing to do with the platform.
Why does Bucky live in one of the whitest enclaves on the face of the earth? Because he CHOSE to live there because he is 100% racist trying desperately to hide behind a persona that says he is not. Who else but a racist would constantly be in stormfront.org all day?