Hillary to release medical records, continue "most transparent" meme

[sheskunk]

This is what is wrong with merica. Neoliberalism is passing itself off as the left and trying to appeal to minorities while the far right embraces bigotry.

Post a meme or STFU. Sheesh.

 

[Rob Roy]

howard dean would be a lolercaust
Fox News would have to stop making shit up, cuz the truth would be crazy enough

Rachel Maddow would probably be found hanging in a Bankok hotel closet with a belt around her neck and her dick in her hand.

The Daily Show would appear to be sober contemplative journailsm

Canada would take over as the leaders of the free world

the Moslems would end the jihad because "They've Suffered Enough"

americans would build rickety boats and rafts to escape to cuba and haiti

mexico would seal up it's northern border

china would have nobody to steal technology from

north korea would transform into a voice of reason and reconciliation on the world stage

iran would stop trying to build a nuke, they could bottle up the Dean Crazy and lob that at israel instead

Canada cannot "take over" as the leader of the free world. It is impossible to impose ("take over") leadership and create a free world. Besides not everybody likes hockey.

 

[Rob Roy]

This is what is wrong with merica. Neoliberalism is passing itself off as the left and trying to appeal to minorities while the far right embraces bigotry.

....you forgot to mention that all the apple pies have corn syrup in them too.

 

[abandonconflict]

....you forgot to mention that all the apple pies have corn syrup in them too.

Segregation isn't freedom and property isn't liberty.

 

[Rob Roy]

Segregation isn't freedom and property isn't liberty.

Forced associations is not freedom. Since the person applying or threatening the force is the aggressor.

You never gave me your definition of what property is, so having a conversation with you becomes difficult. I think there is such a thing as private property, do you?

 

[abandonconflict]

There is a difference between private property and personal property. I'm not pushing a philosophy though, I'm criticizing yours. If you want to learn about anarchism, I can recommend a few books.

 

[Rob Roy]

There is a difference between private property and personal property. I'm not pushing a philosophy though, I'm criticizing yours. If you want to learn about anarchism, I can recommend a few books.

Who or what sets the boundary between private property and personal property ?

Books are great. Recommend away. Please don't make me associate with your Aunt though okay....nothing personal.

 

[abandonconflict]

Who or what sets the boundary between private property and personal property ?

Books are great. Recommend away. Please don't make me associate with your Aunt though okay....nothing personal.

What is Property by Proudhon.

I'm not here to push any set of ideas. The closest I will come is to recommend a book. Since you ignore that I said this, and asked me the same question repeatedly, we have trouble having a conversation.

 

[Rob Roy]

What is Property by Proudhon.

I'm not here to push any set of ideas. The closest I will come is to recommend a book. Since you ignore that I said this, and asked me the same question repeatedly, we have trouble having a conversation.

I think there's already a copy in my mom's basement.

It is customary when criticizing another persons ideas to explain why you hold the position you do. Also the exchange of ideas is facilitated when both parties answer the others questions as long as they aren't silly and refer to Aunt's balls and gerbils.

 

[abandonconflict]

No.

It is customary when debating to understand something before you get into a debate. Notice how I never once asked you about voluntaryism. I have read many books on such faux anarchism and know all about it long before I engage in discussions regarding it.

 

[Rob Roy]

No.

It is customary when debating to understand something before you get into a debate. Notice how I never once asked you about voluntaryism. I have read many books on such faux anarchism and know all about it long before I engage in discussions regarding it.

So your deeper understanding of nonviolent interactions has provided you with a rationalization that it is okay for some people to make others associate with others and if they will not, then it becomes okay to initiate violence against the person seeking to be left alone?

I never once asked about your Aunt's balls. Not once.

 

[abandonconflict]

So your deeper understanding of nonviolent interactions has provided you with a rationalization that it is okay for some people to make others associate with others and if they will not, then it becomes okay to initiate violence against the person seeking to be left alone?

I never once asked about your Aunt's balls. Not once.

You asked me impertinent what ifs. I responded with one.

I never once implied that forcing people to interact would be acceptable. What I said was that "owning" what is the heritage of all and excluding others from it is not compatible with your vaunted non-aggression principal.

 

[DonAlejandroVega]

 

[NoDrama]

and the misogyny continues unabated!

i imagine it will play better on a national stage instead of actually discussing any policy positions or the like.

ANd this is why Hillary is a shoe in for next President.
Any and all dissent can be blamed on misogyny.

 

[UncleBuck]

ANd this is why Hillary is a shoe in for next President.
Any and all dissent can be blamed on misogyny.

most bitching and moaning will be non-substantive and misogynistic though. it's easier and more acceptable than racism.

 

[canndo]

ok, I am begging you on the right.

PLEASE, offer us all a reasonable, right thinking centrist, a bright man or woman without a nutsoid agenda that I can vote for.

I do not want to have to vote for Hillary.

really. Please, for the love of God, someone, anyone that isn't a clown.

 

[abandonconflict]

Good luck on that Canndo.

 

[canndo]

Good luck on that Canndo.

hey. It could happen.

but I doubt I am alone, give us an option from Hillary and we will take it.

 

[UncleBuck]

ok, I am begging you on the right.

PLEASE, offer us all a reasonable, right thinking centrist, a bright man or woman without a nutsoid agenda that I can vote for.

I do not want to have to vote for Hillary.

really. Please, for the love of God, someone, anyone that isn't a clown.

i assure you it will be someone that isn't a brown.

oh, you wrote clown. not brown.

disregard.

 

[Rob Roy]

You asked me impertinent what ifs. I responded with one.

I never once implied that forcing people to interact would be acceptable. What I said was that "owning" what is the heritage of all and excluding others from it is not compatible with your vaunted non-aggression principal.

A person builds a house from natural materials that were not being used on a piece of land that was heretofore unoccupied. They also plant a garden and keep some livestock on a couple of acres surrounding the house they built. Who owns the house, the garden, the other improvements?

I say the person that mixed their labor with the natural resources "owns" the homestead. I say that person is morally justified to defend the property and the proceeds of his labor.