What do you think of the free-for-all at the border?

Dr Kynes

Well-Known Member
It took a married couple that works at my hospital 12 years after their paperwork was started and both have degrees. They were coming from Sarnia which is 10 miles from MI. Chesus is right... oh my.
fuckin canadians.

we dont want their kind here.

those lazy zamboni drivers comin cross the border takin all our maple syrup and stealing all our professional hockey jobs!

go back to canadia!

we should be sinking their boats when they try to paddle into our shores.

let the sharks feast upon their Gravy Fries filled corpses
 

nontheist

Well-Known Member
It took a married couple that works at my hospital 12 years after their paperwork was started and both have degrees. They were coming from Sarnia which is 10 miles from MI. Chesus is right... oh my.
If it took them 12 years then something was wrong with their paperwork. H-1B visas take 30-90 days max unless under administrative review. Paperwork isn't the US's problem, most of the problem is in poor countries corruption is rampant and you can buy a birth certificate and clearance for a 100 bucks.
 

ginwilly

Well-Known Member
fuckin canadians.

we dont want their kind here.

those lazy zamboni drivers comin cross the border takin all our maple syrup and stealing all our professional hockey jobs!

go back to canadia!

we should be sinking their boats when they try to paddle into our shores.

let the sharks feast upon their Gravy Fries filled corpses
While I admire their courage for crossing the shark infested waters of Lake Erie, I'm with you. I wanna drive the damn Zamboni.
 

Harrekin

Well-Known Member
fuckin canadians.

we dont want their kind here.

those lazy zamboni drivers comin cross the border takin all our maple syrup and stealing all our professional hockey jobs!

go back to canadia!

we should be sinking their boats when they try to paddle into our shores.

let the sharks feast upon their Gravy Fries filled corpses
Afraid even a retarded Canadian kid could take your job?
 

nontheist

Well-Known Member
we get it, you hate little brown children. they must pose some type of threat to you.
A straw man, also known in the UK as an Aunt Sally,[1][2] is a common type of argument and is an informal fallacy based on the misrepresentation of an opponent's argument. [3] To be successful, a straw man argument requires that the audience be ignorant or uninformed of the original argument.

The so-called typical "attacking a straw man" implies an adversarial, polemic, or combative debate, and creates the illusion of having completely refuted or defeated an opponent's proposition by covertly replacing it with a different proposition (i.e., "stand up a straw man") and then to refute or defeat that false argument ("knock down a straw man") instead of the original proposition.
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
A straw man, also known in the UK as an Aunt Sally,[1][2] is a common type of argument and is an informal fallacy based on the misrepresentation of an opponent's argument. [3] To be successful, a straw man argument requires that the audience be ignorant or uninformed of the original argument.

The so-called typical "attacking a straw man" implies an adversarial, polemic, or combative debate, and creates the illusion of having completely refuted or defeated an opponent's proposition by covertly replacing it with a different proposition (i.e., "stand up a straw man") and then to refute or defeat that false argument ("knock down a straw man") instead of the original proposition.
why do you and other folks cite hate groups that are founded by white supremacists if it doesn't simply boil down to your hatred of brown people?
 

nontheist

Well-Known Member
why do you and other folks cite hate groups that are founded by white supremacists if it doesn't simply boil down to your hatred of brown people?
Abusive ad hominem usually involves attacking of an opponent as a means to invalidate their arguments. Equating someone's character with the soundness of their argument is a logical fallacy. Mere verbal abuse in the absence of an argument, however, is not ad hominem nor any kind of logical fallacy.[8]
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
Abusive ad hominem usually involves attacking the traits of an opponent as a means to invalidate their arguments. Equating someone's character with the soundness of their argument is a logical fallacy. Mere verbal abuse in the absence of an argument, however, is not ad hominem nor any kind of logical fallacy.[8]
it's not ad hom, you actually did cite hate groups founded by a white supremacist.

recall:

Those studies are not from neo nazi white supremacists. The group is used by the US Government all the time so the government is racist?

Since its inception in 1979, FAIR...
now let's take a look at FAIR.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Federation_for_American_Immigration_Reform

In December 2007, FAIR was designated a hate group by the Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC). Its founding chairman was John Tanton.

who is john tanton?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Tanton

Tanton has for decades been at the heart of the white nationalist scene. He has met with leading white supremacists and associated closely with the leaders of a eugenicist foundation once described by a leading newspaper as a “neo-Nazi organization.” He has made a series of racist statements about Latinos and worried that they were outbreeding whites. At one point, he wrote candidly that to maintain American culture, “a European-American majority” is required.[21]
 

nontheist

Well-Known Member
it's not ad hom, you actually did cite hate groups founded by a white supremacist.

recall:



now let's take a look at FAIR.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Federation_for_American_Immigration_Reform

In December 2007, FAIR was designated a hate group by the Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC). Its founding chairman was John Tanton.

who is john tanton?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Tanton

Tanton has for decades been at the heart of the white nationalist scene. He has met with leading white supremacists and associated closely with the leaders of a eugenicist foundation once described by a leading newspaper as a “neo-Nazi organization.” He has made a series of racist statements about Latinos and worried that they were outbreeding whites. At one point, he wrote candidly that to maintain American culture, “a European-American majority” is required.[21]

 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
so nonthinkist, you're cool with white supremacists who are close with holocaust deniers and eugenicists?

after all, john tanton's groups are partially funded by the white supremacist eugenicists over at the pioneer fund. shall we take a look at them?
 

nontheist

Well-Known Member
so nonthinkist, you're cool with white supremacists who are close with holocaust deniers and eugenicists?

after all, john tanton's groups are partially funded by the white supremacist eugenicists over at the pioneer fund. shall we take a look at them?
 
Top