I'm using the metrics you gave me in your link from the CDC.
If we are talking about Indians, why are you showing me a line where the only number is shown for blacks?
more shit that doesn't add any value to your argument.
So then why don't you post these relevant metrics you fucking hack?
Indians: "Overall, the effect of HIV infection on AI/AN is proportional to their US population size."
- African Americans accounted for an estimated 44% of all new HIV infections among adults and adolescents (aged 13 years or older) in 2010, despite representing only 12% of the US population; considering the smaller size of the African American population in the United States, this represents a population rate that is 8 times that of whites overall.
44% of all new infections when you are only 12% of the population is fucking staggering. Latinos come in next, with 21% of new infections while they are 16% of the population.
Indians, they say, are average. Whatever that means (compared to whites?). Why aren't they even on the board? They should be right up there with blacks and hispanics, right? Oh, "my" ad hoc SES metrics. That's right.
Let's see what other BS spews from your keyborad next, idiot.
waaaahhhh.. everyone is racist!