ginwilly
Well-Known Member
Isn't it cool this conversation is happening in a thread about the bible and global warming?
Kerry Says "The Bible" is why we must save the Muslims from Global Warming/Climate Change
- Thread starter Sand4x105
- Start date
Padawanbater2
Well-Known Member
That's precisely what's not up for debate.
ginwilly
Well-Known Member
Well cool then, how much is attributed to man percentage wise?
Should we continue with ethanol? has ethanol made a difference? If I have to charge my electric car overnight from a coal burning station, how much carbon output am I saving? Is there a consensus you can point me to?
We don't really have a handle on this yet is also an acceptable answer. It doesn't admit defeat.
Padawanbater2
Well-Known Member
You should know, right? I mean, you've got a master of science degree from Michigan, so I guess that makes you a scientist.. because that's how science works... right?
Right.
ginwilly
Well-Known Member
But I don't, and since I fit the criteria of the consensus, I guess that means the consensus doesn't know the answer to those either? I was kind of hoping you would, you present yourself that way. You are allowed to say you don't know either, might lend some credibility. Instead, you choose to attack and deflect.
You've stepped all over your dick trying to portray yourself as anything more than a religious zealot.
Climatology is in it's infancy, there's lots we are still learning and lots we don't know. It really is OK to admit this. What we know, the earth is warming, man is most likely contributing.
Last edited:
Padawanbater2
Well-Known Member
Deny all you want
ginwilly
Well-Known Member
LOL thanks man, deny what btw?
Padawanbater2
Well-Known Member
Deny the scientific consensus on climate change, and all 5 assessments by the IPCC
You know, the actual science
ginwilly
Well-Known Member
You miss the part where I repeat over and over that the consensus is that the earth is warming and it's very likely that man is contributing? Because that's exactly what the consensus states. Or did you miss the part where I said the data is very convincing to me? Sounds like denial to you? wow
I sense frustration young Jedi.
We know what we know, we are trying to figure out what we don't know. If you can't admit you don't know, you never will. (I channeled Doer for that tidbit)
kelly4
Well-Known Member
F
It's gonna climate all over my yard tonight. God is spraying his white goodness all over the area tonight. Awesome! I wonder how many icebergs will be squirted from the sky?
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
al jazeera is not a terrorist organization, you dumb shit. it's a TV network.
more "failed" models.
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
stupid models can never get it right!
it's funny to watch you guys not only deny the conclusion of 34 national academies of science, but reality itself.
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
we have 10,000+ years of CLIMATE data, ditto CO2.
CO2 has been steady at ~280 PPM for thousands of years, suddenly shooting up to ~400 PPM in the last 100 years.
say,- what happens when CO2 levels increase? wanna handle that one, princess?
NLXSK1
Well-Known Member
Do you have a CO2 meter? I assure you, the reading you would get outside would be nowhere near 400 PPM... The average is like 250-280 outside. which would correspond to well.. what it has been for thousands of years...
It's at about 400, Buck has it right.
Normal variance is anywhere from 200-400 PPM, in the last 50 years it has risen by .01%
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
goddamn, deny reality harder.
http://climate.nasa.gov/400ppmquotes/
maybe go apply for a job at NASA with your thuper thecret knowledge, kiddo.
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
