I thought you guys were "winning"...?

abandonconflict

Well-Known Member
Don't get testy just because no one will jump through your hoops and play your little game. We'll just keep telling you how you're full of shit and how you can take your doom and gloom Eco-Loon agenda and fist it straight up your ass. Maybe if you type the word "science" a few more times, your opponents will concede.
Maybe if you type theory in all capital letters a few more times, the rest of us will embrace your faith and intuition.



Science








SCIENCE





Science





SCIENCE





SCIENCE





SCIENCE






SCIENCESCIENCESCIENCESCIENCESCIENCESCIENCESCIENCESCIENCESCIENCESCIENCESCIENCE



























SCIENCE MOTherfucker
 

ginwilly

Well-Known Member
Yeah, let's see some citations, I'm ready to explicate them and arrive at the truth. It's true, I doubt you, but let's see what you can link at least before I shoot it down. The peer review is not self serving. Science is not self serving. Scientists may be self serving, but the peer review will exclude what is not objective.
Somehow I doubt you are seeking the truth after posting a chart that says the Koch brothers are outspending the science community by close to a hundred. You realize government funded studies are in the 10's of billions now. For your chart to be true, the Koch brothers would have to spend trillions.

http://www.climatefundsupdate.org/the-funds

This is a website made by climate change warriors that shows initiatives and current funding. It's a little different than your chart, but I doubt you'll stop posting things like that.

So do I believe you are after the truth? no, I believe you are trying to make me jump through hoops to repost the same things that have been posted here 100's of times.
 

MuyLocoNC

Well-Known Member
Maybe if you type theory in all capital letters a few more times, the rest of us will embrace your faith and intuition.



Science








SCIENCE



Science



SCIENCE



SCIENCE



SCIENCE



SCIENCESCIENCESCIENCESCIENCESCIENCESCIENCESCIENCESCIENCESCIENCESCIENCESCIENCE














SCIENCE MOTherfucker
I'm living rent free right in that noggin of yours. Now you're making your argument in true Padawan style. Because (science) everyone knows (science) that the more times (science) you type the word science (science), the more street cred (science) your position garners.

Science.
 

abandonconflict

Well-Known Member
Somehow I doubt you are seeking the truth after posting a chart that says the Koch brothers are outspending the science community by close to a hundred. You realize government funded studies are in the 10's of billions now. For your chart to be true, the Koch brothers would have to spend trillions.

http://www.climatefundsupdate.org/the-funds

This is a website made by climate change warriors that shows initiatives and current funding. It's a little different than your chart, but I doubt you'll stop posting things like that.

So do I believe you are after the truth? no, I believe you are trying to make me jump through hoops to repost the same things that have been posted here 100's of times.
Thanks, you have successfully cited what I will charitably explicate as sound evidence that the findings of the vast majority of trained scientists which support the conclusion that climate change is man made have been funded by the international community, and not self serving profiteers.

Also, I never claimed that the Koch brothers are outspending them. I said the Koch brothers and Exxon provide funds for the deniers.
 

abandonconflict

Well-Known Member
I'm living rent free right in that noggin of yours. Now you're making your argument in true Padawan style. Because (science) everyone knows (science) that the more times (science) you type the word science (science), the more street cred (science) your position garners.

Science.
You forgot to type THEORY in big bold letters to make me doubt science.
 

ginwilly

Well-Known Member
Thanks, you have successfully cited what I will charitably explicate as sound evidence that the findings of the vast majority of trained scientists which support the conclusion that climate change is man made have been funded by the international community, and not self serving profiteers.

Also, I never claimed that the Koch brothers are outspending them. I said the Koch brothers and Exxon provide funds for the deniers.
You never said it, you just posted a chart that said it for you.

What the consensus of the scientific community is:
The Earth is warming
Man is most likely contributing

What you are claiming is something a bit... more isn't it?
 

abandonconflict

Well-Known Member
You never said it, you just posted a chart that said it for you.

What the consensus of the scientific community is:
The Earth is warming
Man is most likely contributing

What you are claiming is something a bit... more isn't it?
The koch brothers and Exxon do certainly outspend activists.
 

ginwilly

Well-Known Member
Pic of me claiming that the Koch brothers outspend all sources of scientific funding please. Then I need a pic of the Koch brothers and Exxon being activists.
It was implied by the chart you posted.

Do you know what an activist is? How do the Koch brothers not fit that definition?
 

abandonconflict

Well-Known Member
It was implied by the chart you posted.

Do you know what an activist is? How do the Koch brothers not fit that definition?
No.

It wasn't.

and if you think the Koch brothers are activists, ROFL, just ROFL.

I have no response to your stupidity this time.
 

abandonconflict

Well-Known Member
activist

[ak-tuh-vist]
noun
1.
an especially active, vigorous advocate of a cause, especially a political cause.

You don't think the Kochs fit this to a T yet you call me stupid..

AC folks!
The Koch brothers are activists, not oligarchs. Cool story.

Now please point out how I claimed or even how my chart claimed that the Koch brothers outspend all sources of funding for climate science.
 

ginwilly

Well-Known Member
The Koch brothers are activists, not oligarchs. Cool story.

Now please point out how I claimed or even how my chart claimed that the Koch brothers outspend all sources of funding for climate science.
It was implied or you wouldn't have posted a chart saying these activists outspend these other activists.

And yes, the Kochs are oligarchs, Soros is an oligarch. There are many bogeymen out there. Is there a rule that oligarchs can't be activists?
 

abandonconflict

Well-Known Member
It was implied or you wouldn't have posted a chart saying these activists outspend these other activists.
No, I'm sick of you always trying to turn debates into "no I said this and no you said this"

You claimed that the chart implies that the koch brothers outspend all sources of funding for climate science, now put up or shut the fuck up.
 

abandonconflict

Well-Known Member
Somehow I doubt you are seeking the truth after posting a chart that says the Koch brothers are outspending the science community by close to a hundred. You realize government funded studies are in the 10's of billions now. For your chart to be true, the Koch brothers would have to spend trillions.
here it is
 

ginwilly

Well-Known Member
No, I'm sick of you always trying to turn debates into "no I said this and no you said this"

You claimed that the chart implies that the koch brothers outspend all sources of funding for climate science, now put up or shut the fuck up.
What was your point in posting the chart? It wasn't to show the disparity of spending by the deniers?

I just wanted to show that Kochs spend more than the guy on the corner isn't really believable I hope you know.
 

abandonconflict

Well-Known Member
You do this in every debate when you're losing. Put up or shut up.
Prove that I made the claims I you say I made or that the chart I posted did.
 
Top