A question for Libertarians.

ginwilly said:
those people are infringing upon other's rights kinda like you try to do

the difference is, when you do it, you think it's ok.

In no world should people be allowed to treat others that way. They are actually assaulting that woman and should be arrested.
Click to expand...

that's what you're arguing for a return to.
 
ginwilly said:
If you truly believe society would revert to lynchings and "coloreds drink this fountain" then I understand why you think the way you do.

but yeah, you dumb.
Click to expand...

are places that deny service to gays getting boycotted and shut down?

or are republicans like you making it a point to patronize and defend these places?
 
UncleBuck said:
does excluding people on the sole basis of skin color strike you as something that is not racist?

does that make sense in your racist head?
Click to expand...

If we are excluding people for any reason it's wrong.

The problem is, there are eleventy billion reasons people base exclusions on that you let happen daily. Your way is very inconsistent. You can exclude for this, but not that, this and that, but not those.

What you are saying is "these people need special consideration under the law, those people don't". I just happen to disagree.
 
ginwilly said:
If we are excluding people for any reason it's wrong.

The problem is, there are eleventy billion reasons people base exclusions on that you let happen daily. Your way is very inconsistent. You can exclude for this, but not that, this and that, but not those.

What you are saying is "these people need special consideration under the law, those people don't". I just happen to disagree.
Click to expand...

why do you support excluding people on the sole basis of skin color?
 
UncleBuck said:
are places that deny service to gays getting boycotted and shut down?

or are republicans like you making it a point to patronize and defend these places?
Click to expand...

For those places that denied service to gays, did the gays have alternative businesses within the same city they could have used? Did the gays pick the ONE business in the city that would refuse them?

No, I'm not putting "can't get my cake at the bakery I want" in the same realm of what blacks went through in the 50's and 60's.

You are a disgusting person to even make that comparison.
 
ginwilly said:
For those places that denied service to gays, did the gays have alternative businesses within the same city they could have used? Did the gays pick the ONE business in the city that would refuse them?

No, I'm not putting "can't get my cake at the bakery I want" in the same realm of what blacks went through in the 50's and 60's.

You are a disgusting person to even make that comparison.
Click to expand...
I still wonder what gay cake is.

Is it like straight cake with two dudes on top?

Could they not order it without the dudes and just add them themselves?
 
UncleBuck said:
why do you support excluding people on the sole basis of skin color?
Click to expand...

I don't.

I support your right to not serve baptists if you wanted.

For you, it's about control and making people behave the way you want. For me, I don't care what you do as long as you are not harming another.
 
ginwilly said:
For those places that denied service to gays, did the gays have alternative businesses within the same city they could have used? Did the gays pick the ONE business in the city that would refuse them?

No, I'm not putting "can't get my cake at the bakery I want" in the same realm of what blacks went through in the 50's and 60's.

You are a disgusting person to even make that comparison.
Click to expand...

i'm just rebutting your stupid delusion that people will just behave themselves with a modern day example.

racists like you prove otherwise. bigots are gonna exclude however they can. if they can't do it on race, they'll do it on sexuality.

and now you are insinuating that two gay people going to get a cake for their wedding is a conspiracy.

tell us again how blacks are responsible for any and all problems in the south and then blame me for it.
 
UncleBuck said:
i'm just rebutting your stupid delusion that people will just behave themselves with a modern day example.

racists like you prove otherwise. bigots are gonna exclude however they can. if they can't do it on race, they'll do it on sexuality.

and now you are insinuating that two gay people going to get a cake for their wedding is a conspiracy.

tell us again how blacks are responsible for any and all problems in the south and then blame me for it.
Click to expand...

I would say blacks are as responsible as whites wouldn't you?

And yes, there are idiots and racists who would not serve gays or blacks or whites or browns or purples or men or women or dogs or lutherans . So The Fuck What. It's not 1950. If you can't get served there, go across the street.
 
ginwilly said:
I would say blacks are as responsible as whites wouldn't you?
Click to expand...

no, that's not what you said.

when i made a statement of fact about the south without any mention of race, you replied:

because the south has so many blacks


ginwilly said:
If you can't get served there, go across the street.
Click to expand...

so why do you support the racist practice of excluding people on the sole basis of their skin color?
 
UncleBuck said:
that's hilarious.

you are on record over and over and over again defending the racist practice of denying service to people on the sole basis of their skin color.




are you saying that the denial of service that blacks faced before civil rights was harmless then?
Click to expand...

harmless in what way?

The treatment by the cops the blacks received was harmful.

Making someone pick up food at the back door instead of the front door is causing embarrassment and inconvenience. Not harm.

You seem to be a bit "fluffy" if you know what I mean. Like a little sissy I guess is a better way to say it. Not gay, just not really a grown up, definitely no testosterone.
 
ginwilly said:
Making someone pick up food at the back door instead of the front door is causing embarrassment and inconvenience. Not harm.
Click to expand...

what about charging someone twice as much for gas?

denying them a room at your motel?

what about being forced to choose from a smaller pool of goods and services solely due to your skin color?

do you think all that was harmless?

ginwilly said:
You seem to be a bit "fluffy" if you know what I mean. Like a little sissy I guess is a better way to say it. Not gay, just not really a grown up, definitely no testosterone.
Click to expand...

are you trying to imply that real men are racists, like you?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top