Capitalism loses

[Dr Kynes]

I'm saying you've never read Marx, and you know it

You've probably read snippets (see 'quote mined') of his work on right wing political blogs that oppose improving economic conditions for the middle and lower classes and just regurgitate it on social media and forums like RIU

Same thing with Darwin, Chomsky, Nietzsche, Dawkins, Harris, Feinman, etc.

It's clear to people who have actually read these things your opposition to the work is nothing more than soundbite talking points reiterated by neoconservatives that never actually delves into the substance of thought the works detail

so you wont take a stand?

you wish to argue that i havent read something (actually a lot of things) based on your expertise and study of my reading habits?
.
if you want to have a literary dick measuring contest, you can cram it with walnuts.

i have no interest in competitions where i am guaranteed to win.

Marx's theories are based on an incomplete and fallacious series of assumptions about human motivations, history and social structures.
if you want a summary of Marx's works, go buy a term paper from a community college freshman.

take a stand junior, or sit down when grownups are talking .

 

[Padawanbater2]

you wish to argue that i havent read something

I know you haven't because your arguments against these ideas don't line up with the arguments themselves

You're still sitting there asking "where's the missing link?" when On the Origin of Species explains exactly where the 'missing link' is and "why was this winter colder than last winter?" when the IPCC's report explains exactly why some winters are colder than others while we continue to record record temperatures globally..

You disagree with what the adults have to say about it, so you dismiss it for fairy tales and believe what you want to believe.. like a child

 

[Padawanbater2]

take a stand junior, or sit down when grownups are talking .

Also, that's fresh, considering this thread was made specifically for you and for some weird reason you still haven't shown up to defend yourself..

https://www.rollitup.org/t/what-are-your-religious-beliefs.852015/

So come on, "take a stand junior"...

 

[Dr Kynes]

I know you haven't because your arguments against these ideas don't line up with the arguments themselves

You're still sitting there asking "where's the missing link?" when On the Origin of Species explains exactly where the 'missing link' is and "why was this winter colder than last winter?" when the IPCC's report explains exactly why some winters are colder than others while we continue to record record temperatures globally..

You disagree with what the adults have to say about it, so you dismiss it for fairy tales and believe what you want to believe.. like a child

mmm yes, time for Red Herrings.

cant deal with the issue, manufacture a distraction based on straw men.

i do NOT dispute evolution, and never have.

my disagreement with the IPCC's claims is based on their failure to make a case, not my lack of faith in science.

your inability to articulate WHY you believe some things but not others demonstrates a shallow and unsophisticated thought process, dominated by social pressures to conform, and a desire to be viewed as one of the smart people who jumped on the bandwagon, rather than the ignorant luddites who decided to think about the ramifications of the issue first.

good job Toby, you have made yourself look more foolish than ever before.

a grand achievement indeed, considering the skill with which you crafted your extant reputation as a fool.

keep pushing yourself, strive, reach for the brass ring, eventually you may become King Of The Retards.

 

[Dr Kynes]

Also, that's fresh, considering this thread was made specifically for you and for some weird reason you still haven't shown up to defend yourself..

https://www.rollitup.org/t/what-are-your-religious-beliefs.852015/

So come on, "take a stand junior"...

another stale red herring?

my religious views are my own, i do not have to justify them to you, nor do i need to present them for your approval on demand.

they are not relevant to the issue, and those who wish to know need only ask, except you.

you havent earned any insight into my religious views.

 

[Padawanbater2]

Your disagreement with any of these things are simply because they contradict your personal worldview and that makes you uncomfortable and afraid

Just like you project onto other people, you show yourself to believe things based purely on emotion

Like a child

 

[UncleBuck]

lol, kynes just declared victory three times.

maybe that will make it true.

 

[Padawanbater2]

they are not relevant to the issue

Except they are relevant to the issue..

It's funny you disagree with that..

Remember how you brought up Penn State's "exoneration" of Sandusky (without evidence) and attempted to use that to justify your dismissal of 1 of the 8 independent investigations of Michael Mann in the fabricated 'climategate' "scandal"

Same exact issue we have here. You deny ACC, a theory of science virtually unanimously accepted by the scientific community, so why would anyone accept what you say about anything else, especially regarding peer review or the scientific method, but as well as political ideologies or economic theories?

Ponder that conundrum..

 

[Dr Kynes]

Except they are relevant to the issue..

It's funny you disagree with that..

Remember how you brought up Penn State's "exoneration" of Sandusky (without evidence) and attempted to use that to justify your dismissal of 1 of the 8 independent investigations of Michael Mann in the fabricated 'climategate' "scandal"

Same exact issue we have here. You deny ACC, a theory of science virtually unanimously accepted by the scientific community, so why would anyone accept what you say about anything else, especially regarding peer review or the scientific method, but as well as political ideologies or economic theories?

Ponder that conundrum..

 

[Padawanbater2]

But don't you remember that exchange you and I had when you accused me of as much and I posted proof of me demonizing the left (your righty in crime, Herrakin even confirmed it)? You didn't provide any evidence in kind of yourself doing the same with the right, why was that?

Because you don't criticize the right, because you've built your political ideology cupping the right's nuts for decades and can't let them go

 

[sheskunk]

I know hell of science shit. The fact that you don't proves it.

lulz

 

[Dr Kynes]

But don't you remember that exchange you and I had when you accused me of as much and I posted proof of me demonizing the left (your righty in crime, Herrakin even confirmed it)? You didn't provide any evidence in kind of yourself doing the same with the right, why was that?

Because you don't criticize the right, because you've built your political ideology cupping the right's nuts for decades and can't let them go

i made my arguments, they are unchallenged.

you laid out your fallacies, they are obvious.

and now your jimmies are rustled, and youre becoming hysterical.

 

[Padawanbater2]

i made my arguments, they are unchallenged.

you laid out your fallacies, they are obvious.

and now your jimmies are rustled, and youre becoming hysterical.

I simply don't want to get involved in another thread where you refuse to admit you're wrong or ever accept responsibility

So think about all of this during your next autoerotic asphyxiation bout and get back to me

 

[UncleBuck]

...you don't criticize the right...you've built your political ideology cupping the right's nuts...

when he initially joined, he made a few disagreements and seemed to keep to (almost) reality. close enough at least.

but lately, he has cemented his presence here as the guy who will back up red1966 and NLXSK and beentherejahbrudda. the guy who sticks up for "european cultural superiority" and says rushton is "a respected academic" and "niggers...are like that everywhere". the guy who posts manifestos on cultural marxism.

but when he was your age or older, he was working at walmart for minimum wage stocking the hostess products, living with half a dozen other family members in some shithole in vallejo. and he can't do simple exponents or conversions or read a graph.

he is increasingly becoming walking proof that racism and lower intelligence correlate with conservatism.

 

[Sir Stanky]

I vote for startrekism. Transporters and warp drive would be way cool.

 

[Padawanbater2]

he is increasingly becoming walking proof that racism and lower intelligence correlate with conservatism.

Lol, as if any more proof was necessary..

Conservative political ideology is built on racism, sexism and inequality. Lust for "free market" capitalism, hate for anything that empowers minorities and underprivileged. These people are fake Americans who utilize the morality fallacy to present themselves above the rest of us. It's why he can't ever admit he was wrong about anything, when everybody is wrong about something..

At this point, the dude seems like a parody of himself, almost like a way better Colbert, but you know it's fake, so that makes it that much sadder, especially when you realize there are dozens-hundreds of these same kind of people occupying our country..

 

[Padawanbater2]

Flawless Victory.

Pro tip: If you have to declare victory, you've already lost, champ..

 

[Dr Kynes]

I vote for startrekism. Transporters and warp drive would be way cool.

Roddenberryism is Utopian Communism with aliens.

i would prefer Star Wars Episode Oneism

who doesnt love the minutia of interstellar commerce regulations?

plus jedis.

 

[Dr Kynes]

Pro tip: If you have to declare victory, you've already lost, champ..

then kindly demonstrate how China is not an Authoritarian Socialist system under the banner of Maoism.

thats all you have to do.

 

[SmokeyDan]

They say they are. They act like they are. What would you say they are?

China is ruled by a nominally communist party.

That party has set up special economic zones where different principles apply.

They are not a nation state, they are a civilization state. A concept hard to grasp by westerners.

We didn't believe them when they said they'd take Hong Kong and be 1 country 2 systems. They did.