Berkley getting smacked around by the police

hellmutt bones

Well-Known Member
racist shitstains like you said the same thing during the civil rights marches too.

ignorance and stupidity being a prerequisite for racism, it is no wonder that you refuse to or are unable to learn from history.
Well lets say there was a bunch of cows protesting and blocking the street what would u do?
So lets take race out of the equation.. what would u do if u where told to police these cows?
Now pretend it was a bunch of good looking men and women in swimsuits.. thats what im getting at.
Its called favoratizm. If it was a bunch of good looking people most people would do the same thing them cops are doing..but if it where a bunch of cows most people would unleash some ass wopping.
And by cows i mean animal cows.
thats what im getting at!
 

SmokeyDan

Well-Known Member
The war on drugs.. ur on drugs!! U tha fuq u think gives us drugs??
U think mexico has a magic tunnel that brings the drugs in?? Open ur eyes our goverment has let the border become a warzone because they want to make some serious dollars.. u think that the cartells got all this military wepons from russia?
If US really cared about Americans they would do something about this. Instead they blind us with propaganda about other countrys and terrorism across the seas.
when there is real terrorism and beheadings by the masses wright next door to us!!
Protesting is useless if u wanna make a diffrence become more informed and do something about it. Wich most of the growers on this site are doing instead of giving ur money to cartells when u go and buy blackmarket stuff.
So let me get this straight, the government, who can just print money out of thin air, needs to sell drugs and guns for money?

Ok...
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
Well lets say there was a bunch of cows protesting and blocking the street what would u do?
So lets take race out of the equation.. what would u do if u where told to police these cows?
Now pretend it was a bunch of good looking men and women in swimsuits.. thats what im getting at.
Its called favoratizm. If it was a bunch of good looking people most people would do the same thing them cops are doing..but if it where a bunch of cows most people would unleash some ass wopping.
And by cows i mean animal cows.
thats what im getting at!
do let me know when the cows start protesting.
 

hellmutt bones

Well-Known Member
So let me get this straight, the government, who can just print money out of thin air, needs to sell drugs and guns for money?

Ok...
U must be a little kid to belive that all they have to do is print money!
Yeha im gonna trade u bunch of green paper for a bar of gold!
What rock do u live under.lol
 

Thecouchlock

Well-Known Member
Well lets say there was a bunch of cows protesting and blocking the street what would u do?
So lets take race out of the equation.. what would u do if u where told to police these cows?
Now pretend it was a bunch of good looking men and women in swimsuits.. thats what im getting at.
Its called favoratizm. If it was a bunch of good looking people most people would do the same thing them cops are doing..but if it where a bunch of cows most people would unleash some ass wopping.
And by cows i mean animal cows.
thats what im getting at!

 

god1

Well-Known Member
nice rebuttal, shit for brains.
Here ya go "self proclaimed homo" boy, (not that there's anything wrong with that);

You have a problem; your assumed probability of interaction among the populations is not correct; it's not a uniform funtion, ie, the probability of interaction with white guys is not the same for every black guy. Another example, your data provides no clue as to whether or not a single killer had multiple contacts and killed all those contacts. As an example, say 23.58 black guys each killed their 19 white contacts made, that means, according to you, 448 white dudes died at the hands of 23 (and some change) black guys. The provided analysis is way too simplistic; you can't make any assumptions about those types of variables or the conditions of the encounters. So the analysis is usless.

But one calculation you could make; assuming that the social conditions that enabled these conditions were to remain unchanged as a function of population swings, you would be able to predict the number of kills as a function of change in population size.

For example, the obvious point, using your data, and looking strictly at the ratio of kills per population for each group, blacks always have a higher kill ratio. Your data gives no clue why this is the case.

Stop "posting" useless shit you don't understand ... you're better at showing your boy friends hands up your ass.
 
Last edited:

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
You have a problem; your assumed probability of interaction among the populations is not correct.
that's actually robert o'brian's calculation. you can feel free to debunk it and demonstrate why it is so wrong if you'd like. seems about right to me though.
 

ILoveYouSweetLeaf

Well-Known Member
Every day in my neighborhood.. but once some white people getting harrased now its geneside.. com on give me a break.
they look like there just being pushed the fuck out the street.
If u gonna protest then know ur gonna get smaked around.
thought the idea of America is you could protest without the fear of getting smacked around? or have you and the people who liked your comment given up on that ideal of America? Hell I think its even written somewhere you could do that very thing.
 

SmokeyDan

Well-Known Member
that's actually robert o'brian's calculation. you can feel free to debunk it and demonstrate why it is so wrong if you'd like. seems about right to me though.
As I said before. His model would work for random crime.

Hate crime is not random. Hate crime has a victim that is sought out by their attacker. It's not Russian roulette.
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
Hate crime is not random. Hate crime has a victim that is sought out by their attacker.
that would explain why whites victimize blacks at a full 50% greater than random chance would dictate.

it would also explain why blacks victimize whites at a rate 12% less than random chance would dictate.

it's because whites are vicious racists who seek out black victims, knowingly or not.

the same can not be said about blacks based on the statistics we have to work with.
 

SmokeyDan

Well-Known Member
that would explain why whites victimize blacks at a full 50% greater than random chance would dictate.

it would also explain why blacks victimize whites at a rate 12% less than random chance would dictate.

it's because whites are vicious racists who seek out black victims, knowingly or not.

the same can not be said about blacks based on the statistics we have to work with.
That sounds like a statistic you've seen where hispanics are counted as white. Their gang members slaughter black gangs.

Not adjusting for population difference, just raw numbers, bill O'Reilly reported last night on his show that 1000 more murders are committed each year by black skin people over white skin people.
 

past times

Well-Known Member
thought the idea of America is you could protest without the fear of getting smacked around? or have you and the people who liked your comment given up on that ideal of America? Hell I think its even written somewhere you could do that very thing.
Unless in protesting you are breaking laws...Like blocking streets
 

god1

Well-Known Member
wrong again, bignbushy.

http://www.fbi.gov/about-us/cjis/ucr/crime-in-the-u.s/2011/crime-in-the-u.s.-2011/tables/expanded-homicide-data-table-6

dumbasses like you listening to dumbasses like o'reilly only leads to more dumbassery.
The FBI data isn't surprising. White on White ratio is less than Black on Black. When the victim is is White, the percentage of Blacks involved is about twice Whites involved when the victim is Black.

I'm curious about this "random" encounter analysis you're talking about. Do you have a mathematical model or link for this statistical analysis you're talking about?

Thanks
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
When the victim is is White, the percentage of Blacks involved is about twice Whites involved when the victim is Black.
about twice as much?

amazing, considering blacks are a full 19 times more likely to encounter a white than a white is to encounter a black.

if you knew the least little thing about statistics, that would make you wonder why whites victimize blacks as often as they do and why blacks victimize whites as infrequently as they do.


I'm curious about this "random" encounter analysis you're talking about. Do you have a mathematical model or link for this statistical analysis you're talking about?

you must be stupid. i have only named the person and the study about three times now.
 
Top