2016, possible new administration to crack down on cannabis?

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
cheap oil had nothing to do with Obama.
if obama gets the blame when gas is high, and he did, then he gets full credit when it's low again.

you can't have it both ways.

Employment is not up.
funny, we have had 59 straight months of job creation, an all time record, with 11.4 million new jobs, and the last three months have seen job gains not seen since 1999 in the days of clinton.

we are creating so many jobs right now that despite the record job creation numbers, unemployment is ticking up because more people are now looking for work again.

get your fucking facts straight.


They employment statistics are skewed. They only take sensus in certain areas to make them selves look good.
first of all, learn to spell.

secondly, they do not measure unemployment with a census, they measure it with a monthly scientific poll.

third, that monthly scientific poll measures employment throughout the entire nation, not just certain areas.

methodology for said scientific polling is found below.

There are about 60,000 eligible households in the sample for this survey. This translates into approximately 110,000 individuals each month, a large sample compared to public opinion surveys, which usually cover fewer than 2,000 people. The CPS sample is selected so as to be representative of the entire population of the United States. In order to select the sample, all of the counties and independent cities in the country first are grouped into approximately 2,000 geographic areas (sampling units). The Census Bureau then designs and selects a sample of about 800 of these geographic areas to represent each state and the District of Columbia. The sample is a state-based design and reflects urban and rural areas, different types of industrial and farming areas, and the major geographic divisions of each state. (For a detailed explanation of CPS sampling methodology, see Chapter 1 of the BLS Handbook of Methods.)



http://www.bls.gov/cps/cps_htgm.htm#why
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
no realistic and factual. Ask any black person why they voted for Obama. They will all say the same thing.
that he's a democrat?

here is how the black vote has tallied up in the last 6 presidential elections:

2012: 95% obama, 5% romney

2008: 95% obama, 4% mccain

2004: 88% kerry, 11% bush

2000: 90% gore, 9% bush

1996: 84% clinton, 10% dole

1992: 83% clinton, 10% bush, 8% perot

given that it is well established that blacks overwhelmingly vote democrat every election, we can only conclude one of three things about you:

1) you are dumb.
2) you are racist
3) you are dumb and racist (most likely)

there are a few black members on this site, i can tag them and get them in here to ask them why they voted for obama over the other guy if you'd like, princess.

your move.
 

hyroot

Well-Known Member
if obama gets the blame when gas is high, and he did, then he gets full credit when it's low again.

you can't have it both ways.



funny, we have had 59 straight months of job creation, an all time record, with 11.4 million new jobs, and the last three months have seen job gains not seen since 1999 in the days of clinton.

we are creating so many jobs right now that despite the record job creation numbers, unemployment is ticking up because more people are now looking for work again.

get your fucking facts straight.




first of all, learn to spell.

secondly, they do not measure unemployment with a census, they measure it with a monthly scientific poll.

third, that monthly scientific poll measures employment throughout the entire nation, not just certain areas.

methodology for said scientific polling is found below.

There are about 60,000 eligible households in the sample for this survey. This translates into approximately 110,000 individuals each month, a large sample compared to public opinion surveys, which usually cover fewer than 2,000 people. The CPS sample is selected so as to be representative of the entire population of the United States. In order to select the sample, all of the counties and independent cities in the country first are grouped into approximately 2,000 geographic areas (sampling units). The Census Bureau then designs and selects a sample of about 800 of these geographic areas to represent each state and the District of Columbia. The sample is a state-based design and reflects urban and rural areas, different types of industrial and farming areas, and the major geographic divisions of each state. (For a detailed explanation of CPS sampling methodology, see Chapter 1 of the BLS Handbook of Methods.)



http://www.bls.gov/cps/cps_htgm.htm#why
why employment statistics are skewed

1. Changes to the Employment Situation Data
The BLS said, “Establishment survey data have been revised as a result of the annual benchmarking process and the updating of seasonal adjustment factors. Also, household survey data for January 2014 reflect updated population estimates.” The numbers were benchmarked to reflect comprehensive counts of payroll jobs for March 2013.
2. Long-Term Unemployment
The BLS data showed that the total number of long-term unemployed, those on benefits for 27 weeks or more, fell by 232,000 in January to 3.6 million. This is 35.8% of the total unemployed. The BLS showed that long-term unemployed has declined by 1.1 million over the past year.
3. Annual Adjustment to the Population Controls
The civilian labor force was shown to have risen by 499,000 in January. The labor force participation rate ticked up to 63.0% from 62.8% in December. This remains close to a 35-year low. Total employment in the household survey rose by 616,000 over the month, and the employment-population ratio increased by 0.2 percentage points to 58.8.
4. Part-Time Effects
The number of persons employed part time for economic reasons showed a drop of 514,000 to 7.3 million in January. The BLS said, “These individuals were working part time because their hours had been cut back or because they were unable to find full-time work.”
5. Marginal Attached Workers
Some 2.6 million people were considered to be marginally attached to the labor force in January. While this is noted as “little changed from a year earlier,” they were not counted as unemployed because they had not searched for work in the four weeks ahead of the survey. In the marginal group, there were 837,000 discouraged workers in January — people not currently looking for work because they believe no jobs are available for them. The remaining 1.8 million persons marginally attached to the labor force in January had not searched for work for reasons such as school attendance or family responsibilities.
6. Weather
Cold weather in the Midwest and Northeast has to be a factor here in jobs not getting filled. That being said, the revision in nonfarm payrolls for December was only by a tiny 1,000. Weather is permitted to be an excuse, but at some point people looking for work (and companies that have job openings and interviews) cannot get away with the excuse that they just could not physically make it there.
The points brought up here are directly from the BLS, and color has been added or explained. The numbers just do not seem right on the surface, but — as usual — there are explanations for what may be driving this. Of the 12,000 decline in government employees, the U.S. Postal Service was shown to be 9,000 of that number.
All these exceptions or skewed data prevented the unemployment report from wildly swinging stocks and bonds on Friday.


February 8, 2014

« Previous

Next »
 

hyroot

Well-Known Member
that he's a democrat?

here is how the black vote has tallied up in the last 6 presidential elections:

2012: 95% obama, 5% romney

2008: 95% obama, 4% mccain

2004: 88% kerry, 11% bush

2000: 90% gore, 9% bush

1996: 84% clinton, 10% dole

1992: 83% clinton, 10% bush, 8% perot

given that it is well established that blacks overwhelmingly vote democrat every election, we can only conclude one of three things about you:

1) you are dumb.
2) you are racist
3) you are dumb and racist (most likely)

there are a few black members on this site, i can tag them and get them in here to ask them why they voted for obama over the other guy if you'd like, princess.

your move.
I can make.up percentages too. Doesn't make it factual. I used to live in a predominantly black neighborhood. They were all pro Obama. Even wore shirts with Obama's pic on it. I'd ask.them why the like Obama. What has he done to make you like him. I even said dont say because he's black. No one of them could give me an answer. They had no clue to what he was really doing..
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
why employment statistics are skewed

1. Changes to the Employment Situation Data
The BLS said, “Establishment survey data have been revised as a result of the annual benchmarking process and the updating of seasonal adjustment factors. Also, household survey data for January 2014 reflect updated population estimates.” The numbers were benchmarked to reflect comprehensive counts of payroll jobs for March 2013.
2. Long-Term Unemployment
The BLS data showed that the total number of long-term unemployed, those on benefits for 27 weeks or more, fell by 232,000 in January to 3.6 million. This is 35.8% of the total unemployed. The BLS showed that long-term unemployed has declined by 1.1 million over the past year.
3. Annual Adjustment to the Population Controls
The civilian labor force was shown to have risen by 499,000 in January. The labor force participation rate ticked up to 63.0% from 62.8% in December. This remains close to a 35-year low. Total employment in the household survey rose by 616,000 over the month, and the employment-population ratio increased by 0.2 percentage points to 58.8.
4. Part-Time Effects
The number of persons employed part time for economic reasons showed a drop of 514,000 to 7.3 million in January. The BLS said, “These individuals were working part time because their hours had been cut back or because they were unable to find full-time work.”
5. Marginal Attached Workers
Some 2.6 million people were considered to be marginally attached to the labor force in January. While this is noted as “little changed from a year earlier,” they were not counted as unemployed because they had not searched for work in the four weeks ahead of the survey. In the marginal group, there were 837,000 discouraged workers in January — people not currently looking for work because they believe no jobs are available for them. The remaining 1.8 million persons marginally attached to the labor force in January had not searched for work for reasons such as school attendance or family responsibilities.
6. Weather
Cold weather in the Midwest and Northeast has to be a factor here in jobs not getting filled. That being said, the revision in nonfarm payrolls for December was only by a tiny 1,000. Weather is permitted to be an excuse, but at some point people looking for work (and companies that have job openings and interviews) cannot get away with the excuse that they just could not physically make it there.
The points brought up here are directly from the BLS, and color has been added or explained. The numbers just do not seem right on the surface, but — as usual — there are explanations for what may be driving this. Of the 12,000 decline in government employees, the U.S. Postal Service was shown to be 9,000 of that number.
All these exceptions or skewed data prevented the unemployment report from wildly swinging stocks and bonds on Friday.


February 8, 2014

« Previous

Next »
your unattributed copy and paste does nothing to back up your assertion that "they only take sensus in certain areas to make them selves look good".

it does not address that at all.

i could go down the list refuting your nonsense point by point, but i am satisfied enough knowing that you are unoriginal enough to rely on an off topic copy and paste, and dumb enough to resort to changing the subject entirely rather than support your original assertion.
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
I can make.up percentages too. Doesn't make it factual.
http://www.ropercenter.uconn.edu/elections/how_groups_voted/voted_92.html

look it up yourself, dumb dumb.

I used to live in a predominantly black neighborhood. They were all pro Obama. Even wore shirts with Obama's pic on it. I'd ask.them why the like Obama. What has he done to make you like him. I even said dont say because he's black. No one of them could give me an answer. They had no clue to what he was really doing..
wow, very racist.
 

Skylor

Well-Known Member
They are out there..PeopIe who hate Obama cause hes bIac.....my computer is mese up..sorry
 

racerboy71

bud bootlegger
no realistic and factual. Ask any black person why they voted for Obama. They will all say the same thing.
so only black people voted for obama? there's no way in hell that is true since blacks only make up a small percentage of voters in the us, no where near enough to vote obama in on their own..
i voted for barry o, twice even, and not because he was black, but because at the time i thought him to be the better option..
 

hyroot

Well-Known Member
so only black people voted for obama? there's no way in hell that is true since blacks only make up a small percentage of voters in the us, no where near enough to vote obama in on their own..
i voted for barry o, twice even, and not because he was black, but because at the time i thought him to be the better option..
I didn't say only black people voted for him. I said people voted for Obama because he's black. Especially the black community.
 

hyroot

Well-Known Member

Skylor

Well-Known Member
I didn't say only black people voted for him. I said people voted for Obama because he's black. Especially the black community.
agree but they ussaIIy vote d's no matter who is running .............BTW, the R's would have been at war with Iran right now an oiI would be $200 an gas $5.......The R's Iove high oiI prices.....Nixon gave us the 1973 oil crisis an 55 mph to save oII, R's are not for freedom, thats another Iie...weII guns, yes, bout it..
 
Last edited:

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
how is that racist Mr. Argumentative.
you took your personal anecdotal experience and applied it to ALL blacks. that's called stereotyping.

when you say all blacks are the same like that, it is basically the definition of racism.
 
well jeb bush will be the next president. Because he's a bush and no one wants another Democrat. Obama ruined it for future democrats. Jeb bush is pro pot.

also 2 senators just separately filed bills to make cannabis federally legal. But leaving it up to the states to decide.

http://m.huffpost.com/us/entry/6722686

no one will vote for Hillary based on her being a woman. Call it the Obama factor. Everyone that voted for Obama only voted for him because he's black. He ended up being the worst president in history. Worst than Jimmy Carter. Hillary is known for her shady dealings so....
I think Obama ruined it for more than just Democrats.
 
no realistic and factual. Ask any black person why they voted for Obama. They will all say the same thing.
If you didn't vote for Obama or you don't completely support the Obama administration you're automatically a racist. You didn't know that?

I'll be so happy when these clowns are thrown out on their asses and this country can get back to being great again. Obama was an epic fail just as predicted.
 

overgrowem

Well-Known Member
Had a little conversation last night with some friends about legalization/decriminalization around the country. One friend brought up a possible scenario where the next administration could take a heavy handed approach against cannabis, start seriously enforcing federal law and clamping down on states. He thinks the feds have backed off to allow the industry to grow so when they do hit it will be worth it for them. I wouldn't put it past them, but don't think it will actually happen. We're probably going to end up with a R in the W. house, so it's not too far fetched. thoughts?
Failed prohibition is the best policy. Feds chase their tail while the now domestically supplied party rages on. Untaxed.
 
Top