The chart doesn't portray a lot of information, simply because the sample sizes are too small. Also, if we take into account that Paul has a lot less time on the national stage in comparison to Clinton; I believe it's safe to say those numbers do not bode well for Mrs Clinton. I'm not a supporter of either btw, just a bipartisan observation.
does this make you sad?
is this why the tea party is so angry?
is this why the white nationalists who plague our forum are so completely despondent?
cheer up, white nationalists. this toaster can cook an egg.
Yeah, my thoughts exactly.And they both suck balls....
sure, just a bipartisan observation. i bet.The chart doesn't portray a lot of information, simply because the sample sizes are too small. Also, if we take into account that Paul has a lot less time on the national stage in comparison to Clinton; I believe it's safe to say those numbers do not bode well for Mrs Clinton. I'm not a supporter of either btw, just a bipartisan observation.
since when did you stop spamming for the pawls?And they both suck balls....
I'm starting to really want one of those toasters , if I see one whilst I'm fartin around at a store it's mineYou're obsessed with the egg toaster!!
Yes I am found of the breakfast sandwich...I'll probably order one from amazon...damn you to hell Buck..! (I do need a new toaster, mines like 20 yrs old)I'm starting to really want one of those toasters , if I see one whilst I'm fartin around at a store it's mine
I don't think it really matters.Yeah, my thoughts exactly.
Who would you like to see join the race?
Rand definitely ain't Ron.since when did you stop spamming for the pawls?
you couldn't stop the pawl spam last time around.
so helpful.Recommended sample sizes for something like this is around 350 people if you want a 95% confidence level.
Sample sizes look more than adequate.
BTW for those that don't know, 1000LV means sample size of 1,000 Likely Voters
RV = Registered Voters and A= all Adults.