Day 50-no trichomes

bravedave

Well-Known Member
Hps puts out more photons per watt then mh.fact.... This shit is layed in stone several university's have studied this..just because YOU grew frosty buds with mh doesn't mean you're right.. your problem is you're a noob acting like a grow guru.. you grew shitty weed your first time..second time you got better ..now you're on your third..you're just to stupid to see progress. You're not going to reinvent the wheel. And you claiming mh is better then hps for flowering because you grew 2 times in your lifetime is the biggest joke of all.. think about it dude....


Edit. Your plants look very nice btw..good job.
Hard for me to get defensive about some person you have invented to vent against. But, wow it took less than an hour for your first layed in stone, university studied, photon "fact" to shrivel and die. Where's your refutation? Who's playing the Guru again? Dishing out bullshit, claiming fact.

What? You and Uncle Puke run around inventing stories about people, then pat each other on the back and call it validation.

But yeah, thanks! The current IS looking real nice, Oh and not to quibble but my first grow was kickass smoke (yep maybe that dang MH) and this grow of course will net me " about a pound". Thanks for dripping by anyway. I regret using your personae to make a point, but I appreciate you living up to expectations.
 
Last edited:

mr sunshine

Well-Known Member
Hard for me to get defensive about some person you have invented to vent against. But, wow it took less than an hour for your first layed in stone, university studied, photon "fact" to shrivel and die. Where's your refutation? Who's playing the Guru again? Dishing out bullshit, claiming fact.

What? You and Uncle Puke run around inventing stories about people, then pat each other on the back and call it validation.

But yeah, thanks! The current IS looking real nice, Oh and not to quibble but my first grow was kickass smoke (yep maybe that dang MH) and this grow of course will net me " about a pound". Thanks for dripping by anyway. I regret using your personae to make a point, but I appreciate you living up to expectations.
What do you mean he validated what I said.i said hps delivers more photons per watt then mh..Learn to read brave guy..then he said cmh will kick both their asses. There you go spreading your false information again..I bet you think mh cmh are the same...anyway your plants look cool how many lights you running and what did you yield.the last run?
 
Last edited:

bravedave

Well-Known Member
what happened to your avatar?
What happened to you that turned you into such a creepy thing? For that matter, what did I ever do to.you to get you to troll around these threads harassing me? A tatted up , political conservative avatar brought out the fascist in you? Really? Well he is gone until I findsme a good Rubio shot. You are a cancer here. I apologize to the OP for the troll hijack. @admin does not dissuade this guy.
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
What happened to you that turned you into such a creepy thing? For that matter, what did I ever do to.you to get you to troll around these threads harassing me? A tatted up , political conservative avatar brought out the fascist in you? Really? Well he is gone until I findsme a good Rubio shot. You are a cancer here. I apologize to the OP for the troll hijack. @admin does not dissuade this guy.
there's the meltdown.
 

bravedave

Well-Known Member
View attachment 3403662
Is professor Bruce bugby wrong?maybe utah State should fire him and hire you! 2 grows under your belt I'm sure your more then qualified.
Such flailing.
Again, you paint me as having made claims that I did not make so you can argue against it. You also discovered that you fucked up in your previous accusation so you had to hit google, but your argument is not even with me. I made no photon claims, only pointed out that yours were refuted and when your target was not an easy one you folded. Your article's claim about HPS vegetative growth advantage is not even the subject here nor in dispute here. We are talking trichs.
 

mr sunshine

Well-Known Member
Such flailing.
Again, you paint me as having made claims that I did not make so you can argue against it. You also discovered that you fucked up in your previous accusation so you had to hit google, but your argument is not even with me. I made no photon claims, only pointed out that yours were refuted and when your target was not an easy one you folded. Your article's claim about HPS vegetative growth advantage is not even the subject here nor in dispute here. We are talking trichs.
What are you melting down about now? Why can't you communicate like an adult? How much did you yield the last run if you don't mind me asking?
 

CenkTripper

Well-Known Member
The kind does have uv infused with the red and blue spe

Are you speaking for plants in general or for this particular strain. My hijack auto seems to be putting out a ton of resin and trichs (picture below) and is a week behind and in the same tent. The kind does in fact utilize uv along with the rest of their spectrum of blues and reds.
Formation of trichs is genetic, but it is triggered by light. Some genetics need stronger UV lights (indicas), some don't (ruderalis). But the potency and resin production will be much higher with strong UV lights (ie the sun).

If your light source has UV spectrum, then the problem is genetics, it requires stronger UV light IMO...
 

mickey oneil

Well-Known Member
Formation of trichs is genetic, but it is triggered by light. Some genetics need stronger UV lights (indicas), some don't (ruderalis). But the potency and resin production will be much higher with strong UV lights (ie the sun).

If your light source has UV spectrum, then the problem is genetics, it requires stronger UV light IMO...
Thanks tripper for giving actual advice, but I quite like the bantering as well...let's keep that going : ) I usually can't get 2 ppl to respond to my posts, so I don't mind the hijack
 

mickey oneil

Well-Known Member
I'm planning on letting this girl marinade as long as it takes. Is it possible that I got a dud??? I flushed down to 1200 ppms. Should I have flushed even more?
 

theexpress

Well-Known Member
I have a Transiberian that is 50 days today. She has a ton of bud sites and is bushy as hell. She has been shooting up for about 2 weeks now and is right at 36" in height. The issue is that the bud sites aren't producing any trichs...at all...
Ph in/out good
RH ~50%
71-77*F
kind l450 @ 10" from canopy
ppms 2100 (is this too high)
in 5 gallon pot FFOF
calmag
epsom salt
rapid green
FF Tiger bloom
FF big bloom

is is there anything that can be causing this

*shes not showing any signs of deficiencies
*I did prune a bit about 1.5 wks ago.
That is a very sativa looking plant. The leaves the structure of the plant and nugs the amount of Time it's been flowering and how far it is only along and flower to leaf ratio all tell me that is a sativadom plant. Some sativas don't get very kiefy instead there a more sticky sappy like deal. I see some tricomes on the pistils not very much thought.. the fan leaves comming off the buds have no tricomes though. It's just the strain. Hope she smokes good..
 
Top