tweed interview

[oddish]

I don't want to get involved in this at all, but Dizzy has a few good points.. (even though he's a dick)
None of them are here to help you, they're all pushing bigger and more important agendas on the backs of all these small things. If they legalize, it's because there's something in it for them or it ends up giving them control back.

 

[TheDizzyBizzy]

No no, Oddish. Anyone who questions Trudeau's intentions is a Harper apologist! Vianchris speaks for the whole community when he says he wants to tickle Justin's balls while taking him deep inside.

 

[oddish]

No no, Oddish. Anyone who questions Trudeau's intentions is a Harper apologist! Vianchris speaks for the whole community when he says he wants to tickle Justin's balls while taking him deep inside.

See, that's where you cross the line. We can discuss politics without being rude.
Canadian politics is a mockery anyways - the entire system is flawed by design so that your vote doesn't actually determine who runs the country, represents you or who makes decisions. Almost every year I have a serious conflict between who I vote for locally and who that would result in at a higher level.

 

[oddish]

Example: https://www.change.org/p/kathleen-wynne-madeleine-meilleur-ontario-mpps-stop-administrative-penalties-in-ontario

Your vote means nothing once they decide to start making stupid changes.

 

[VIANARCHRIS]

I don't want to get involved in this at all, but Dizzy has a few good points.. (even though he's a dick)
None of them are here to help you, they're all pushing bigger and more important agendas on the backs of all these small things. If they legalize, it's because there's something in it for them or it ends up giving them control back.

And I didn't outright put his points down. I simply asked the question "if not the party who has promised legal. than who should we vote for". We have to vote for somebody... What is the alternative? More of the same with Harper or the NDP's idea of creating a revenue stream for police forces through decrim? I am not foolish enough to believe there aren't financial motives behind legalization, I'm just saying it's a big step forward from prohibition. Will the fight be over?of course not, but we will then be arguing to reform laws on a legal product. Look at how liquor laws have evolved...there was a time when women weren't allowed in bars, now they let kids in. Of course the Ditzy Bitch is too fixated on hating me and Trudeau to form a rational thought so he resorts to attacks. I guess he just likes prohibition...wonder why?

 

[oddish]

And I didn't outright put his points down. I simply asked the question "if not the party who has promised legal. than who should we vote for". We have to vote for somebody... What is the alternative? More of the same with Harper or the NDP's idea of creating a revenue stream for police forces through decrim? I am not foolish enough to believe there aren't financial motives behind legalization, I'm just saying it's a big step forward from prohibition. Will the fight be over?of course not, but we will then be arguing to reform laws on a legal product. Look at how liquor laws have evolved...there was a time when women weren't allowed in bars, now they let kids in. Of course the Ditzy Bitch is too fixated on hating me and Trudeau to form a rational thought so he resorts to attacks. I guess he just likes prohibition...wonder why?

I vote for the Christian Heritage Party.

http://chp.ca/Commentary/detail/pushing-marijuana/7

CHP Canada does have a position on marijuana. We recognize that medical science says it’s useful as a prescription drug for medical purposes. Additionally, prescription drugs we know are kept out of the hands of children because they can’t buy them over the counter. That’s not rocket science is it? CHP Canada will implement real solutions, and even give credit for those that are former Liberal ideas.

I think that's the best we'll never get.

 

[WHATFG]

I hardly recognized you odd!

 

[oddish]

I hardly recognized you odd!

My bad