I'd like to show you guys a few things that I'm working on. While I certainly have not given up on the NFT tube idea, I'd like to try a few new things and since I have quite a few plants that are still not in the octagon, I figure what the hell...lets use those for these new ideas.
All of the ideas I'm about to share will be in 1 gallon containers. The ones I'm prototyping with are black and circular. I have on order white circular ones and white rectangular ones...both 1 gallon still. Because black will absorb heat, I won't be using these containers but all of the ideas will of course transfer.
DWC #1:
This uses a single container. It has 2 intakes at the top...one for air and one for water. The drain is up near the top and would be positioned approximately 1/4" to 1/2" below the bottom of the 2" net pot that would be sitting on top. The last picture compares the 2 air stones I would be considering. a 4" air stone requires a pretty strong air pump and is probably way overkill. I'll be filling the bucket and try both stones and just see how they look. The reservoir would be well oxygenated as well. Note the water line...this is submerged all the way to the bottom so all new water coming in will arrive at the bottom. In theory, this should force the old water through the drain hole. Water pump would be on 24/7 of course.
View attachment 3457101 View attachment 3457102 View attachment 3457103 View attachment 3457104 View attachment 3457105 View attachment 3457108
DWC #2:
This idea is nearly the same as the above example except that 2 buckets are involved. A few very small holes are drilled in the inner container to let water overflow into the outer container. These holes are positioned just below where the bottom of the net pot would be sitting. The outer container has a drain at the bottom which returns to the reservoir. Everything else about the air stone and water coming in are identical.
Pros/Cons between the 2 DWC ideas:
The main pro for idea #1 is that the drain hole is already elevated which means these containers could possibly sit right on the floor and not have to be elevated.
The main pro for idea #2 is that the temperature of the water in each container should be less affected by heat. With the outer layer of plastic followed by a steady stream of water coming from the run-off, there is somewhat of a shield. This could all be bullshit and wrong...I'm just thinking outloud. Maybe this would make zero difference at all...maybe it would actually be worse as the water would be coming in direct contact with the outer bucket and actually absorb more heat. I'd like to hear your thoughts.
Idea #3:
Nothing really special here but want to see what you think. This one is similar to DWC #2 in that 2 buckets would be used. The inner bucket would be filled with about anything. I'm probably going to try the following: Coco/Perlite, Perlite only, Hydroton, Growstone. The container holding the medium just has a few small holes in the bottom that I drilled. Depending on the medium, I might adjust the size of these holes. For the larger stuff like hydroton and growstone, I've done three 1/4" holes. The lid is really what is worth talking about. It might seem ridiculous and maybe it is. I have not been able to find any halo water rings that have 1/4" inlets. These sprayers I have do not give great coverage but 4 of them oriented like this gives the entire container perfect coverage. Of course, this means I have to waste 4 lines to feed it.
View attachment 3457111 View attachment 3457112 View attachment 3457113 View attachment 3457114
Any and all thoughts, ideas, criticisms, etc are welcome!