OK, GR ... this is from one of the sites that you call "facts:"
This petition signed by some 500 Canadians was presented by the Deputy Leader of the New Democratic Party (NDP), which is one of Canada's main opposition parties in the House of Commons.
This presentation is of significance because it suggests that the leadership of the NDP is sceptical of the official explanation regarding 9/11 and is willing to debate the issue in the Canadian House of Commons.
Canadian MP Libby Davies reads 9/11 petition in Parliament
The 911 Commission report is a fraudulent document. "Elements within the US government were complicit in the murder of thousands of people on 9/11/2001."
PETITION TO THE HOUSE OF COMMONS IN PARLIAMENT ASSEMBLED
We, the undersigned citizens of Canada draw the attention of the House to the following:
THAT, scientific and eyewitness evidence shows that the 9/11 Commission Report is a fraudulent document and that those behind the report are consciously or unconsciously guilty of covering up what happened on 9/11/2001. This evidence overwhelmingly supports the conclusion that World Trade Center Towers 1, 2 and 7 were brought down by demolition explosives and that the official theory of the towers collapsing from the airplanes and the ensuing fires is irrefutably false.
We further believe that elements within the US government were complicit in the murder of thousands of people on 9/11/2001. This event brought Canada into the so-called "War on Terror," it changed our domestic and foreign policies for the worse, and it will continue to have negative consequences for us all if we refuse to look at the facts.
THEREFORE, your petitioners call upon Parliament to:
(1) Immediately launch its own investigation into the events of 9/11/2001 on behalf of the 24 Canadian citizens murdered in New York City.
(2) Act lawfully on the findings of its own investigation by helping to pursue the guilty parties in the international courts.
Committed to truth and accountability,
So there you have it ... THERE ARE NO FACTS PRESENTED HERE. All that's presented is someone's "feelings" and thoughts. See ... in other words, you post these nut-ball conspiracy theory "beliefs" and "feelings" as though they are fact when they are not. They talk about "scientific and eyewitness evidence" ... then present no evidence. Like O'Bama's Hope and Change, its nothing but bullshit and you've bought into it. Simple as that.
Vi