Benghazi Committee Outs CIA source

Flaming Pie

Well-Known Member
they had 11 hours to accomplish something about Benghazi. They got nothing, Whose freaking fault is that.
Hypothetically, would you crack after being grilled for 11 hours?

Just curious how long people could last sitting in a chair and talking..
 

Flaming Pie

Well-Known Member
IMO, all this is just a side show.

Just stuff to keep us busy a
lol, you really can't read and it seems to upset you.

I should have said Clinton signed the repeal and Ms. Clinton refuses to reinstate it because it would make Bill look bad. We can say Clinton balanced the budget though can't we. Does a president actually make the budget?

Is that really different?

I posted the link, you posted the rhetoric. You never read the link or you would have stopped a few posts ago.
TLDR because racism. lol.

That's half the people on this forum.

Thanks Uncle Buck. You have effectively stifled all productive debate.
 

Flaming Pie

Well-Known Member
The republicans have already admitted BENGHAZI probe is all about attacking a political foe.

Every state that has investigated Planned Parenthood has found no wrong doing

You however won't believe it. Only two options left are ignore your ignorance or call you names that fit like. Dumbass
I won't? You know what they say about ASSuming things.

I love how you put me in the "ignorant" box and choose to stifle a productive debate by pointing fingers and talking about me like you actually know how I feel on the issues.

The politics section could be a place for informing people, instead you decide to troll.
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
I read the official report.

Nothing illegal was discovered BUT there were some short sighted decisions made that got people killed. Not enough guards, not enough artillary, to large and open of a complex, etc.

This shouldn't have required a committee to find this out. It should have been released information a couple months after the attack. Not sure why it took years to understand why we were attacked and lost our people.
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
IMO, all this is just a side show.

Just stuff to keep us busy a

TLDR because racism. lol.

That's half the people on this forum.

Thanks Uncle Buck. You have effectively stifled all productive debate.
ask ginwilly about his theory that certain "geographic regions" failed to "evolve from the neck up". ask him what the geographic regions are and why they did not select for intelligence, like every single other place on earth.

then tell me if he's spouting white supremacy propaganda or not. and then tell me you still want him hear delivering his ill-informed, ignorant, hateful, and racist propaganda.
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
I won't? You know what they say about ASSuming things.

I love how you put me in the "ignorant" box and choose to stifle a productive debate by pointing fingers and talking about me like you actually know how I feel on the issues.

The politics section could be a place for informing people, instead you decide to troll.
there is no way to stifle a productive debate about benghazi, or the emails, or planned parenthood, because they are not productive debates. they are wild goose chases designed to smear hillary because republicans are frightened of her worse than they are frightened of obama.

i'm sorry these simple truths upset you so much.
 

ChesusRice

Well-Known Member
I won't? You know what they say about ASSuming things.

I love how you put me in the "ignorant" box and choose to stifle a productive debate by pointing fingers and talking about me like you actually know how I feel on the issues.

The politics section could be a place for informing people, instead you decide to troll.
Planned parenthood did nothing wrong. Agree?
Clinton did nothing wrong in regards to Benghazi. Agree?
 

ginwilly

Well-Known Member
Well whatever the fuck it is you do at the hospital do you or do you not rely on factual information in order to treat patients or do you just use 'measures'?

Christ already, are you really that stupid?
There you go again, saying something really dumb while calling someone stupid. Haven't you been burned enough to learn better by now?

Sky it's hot!
ow!
Sky it's hot!
OW!
Sky it's hot!
ow ow ow!!

never mind
 

Blunted 4 lyfe

Well-Known Member
So you didn't read the link from the Clinton Library either. At least you didn't go off on a rant about it being Fox propaganda. So you got that going for you.

You can remain willfully ignorant and absolve Clinton of the repeal or you can read the years of correspondence between he and his advisers and admit he had a role in it.

Wait a minute, you don't even know what the bill was, did or why we need it, you are still on the Dodd-Frank bandwagon. (Which you don't know what it does either)

You can go back to insults, sorry about that. Didn't mean to suggest you read a link and argue from a place of knowledge, my bad.
you're some piece of work I had acknowledge the Clinton s cozy up to big money my argument was that you incorrectly stated Clinton repealed GS when in fact he didn't. Clinton and his most trusted aids wanted GS to go away but he did not repeal it.

Spin it however you like you're still wrong.

B4L
 

ginwilly

Well-Known Member
you're some piece of work I had acknowledge the Clinton s cozy up to big money my argument was that you incorrectly stated Clinton repealed GS when in fact he didn't. Clinton and his most trusted aids wanted GS to go away but he did not repeal it.

Spin it however you like you're still wrong.

B4L
And I admitted I worded that poorly and should have said he signed off on it after years of urging by his staff. I did that pages ago but you won't let go of the fact I made a mistake, admitted it and tried to get you to read a link from the Clinton Library, that you STILL haven't read.

Let it go and stop slamming me over and over for something I've already corrected. Dude... It's like I called your mom a whore or something you are so emotionally invested in no stink getting on a dem. It's odd.

I gave Clinton's role in it as a reason why Hillary refuses to re-instate it. She would have to admit Bill made a mistake. If she took your angle, she could re-instate and try to spin it where Clinton had nothing to do with it, like you are trying. I didn't think that would work, but I have a feeling there are more of you pom pom wavers out there who would eat that shit up.

Why do you think Hillary was the only one on that stage saying she wouldn't reinstate GS? Let's hear the partisan excuse you come up with for her, this should be good.

Or you could ignore the point again and go back to "but Clinton can't make laws!" idiocy. Tell me, do you credit Clinton at all with balancing the budget? Because as you know, a president doesn't dictate the budget.
 
Last edited:
Top