Flaming Pie
Well-Known Member
TLDR version?
Lol. I need to come back later and reread.
Lol. I need to come back later and reread.
Expand?When you read his opinions, it's very interesting. I had to read them when taking Constitution Law, and sometimes I'd sit there and be like, "It makes total sense, I can see where he's coming from, and I fucking hate him for making me agree with him when I know I don't want to." Lol.
I don't like his interpretation of the Constitution, but the way he lays out his arguments can be or are sometimes convincing or do make sense (if you look at them in a certain way). There are multiple ways and different theories to interpret law/the US constitution. I just feel like his way of looking at it is antiquated.Expand?
What does everyone know is spot on?You mean you were paid well to march in Ferguson as a plant?
I know, you did every thing you could to stop these thugs from destroying their own kin's businesses and cities as they looted and burned the place down, right? All in the name of "justice" of course.
Jealous of Scalia because he has the balls to say what everyone knows is spot on?
Stopped reading. Suggest you leave if being an American is so sickening to you.This man makes me sick to be an American today.
Fuck wishing for chicken bones and accidents. They need term limits.This thread is one of only a handful of reasons why I give a shit who wins the presidency... Supreme Court appointments. Shit like this and the Citizens United ruling.
I'd love to see Scalia choke on a chicken bone while a Democrat is in office and be replaced by an ultra liberal Justice.
Agreed, but as it stands I'm holding out hope for the chicken bone...Fuck wishing for chicken bones and accidents. They need term limits.
Ehh... historically Justices have actually had a liberal shift the longer they've been on the bench with the exception of Rehnquist. There are a lot of good arguments for not imposing term limits on Justices, such as allowing them to exercise independent judicial review and not be subject to facing being elected by Congress, or allowing Federal judges from lower courts to lobby/rule in ways to make themselves favorable for the Supreme Court. Then again there are a lot of arguments for it, but mostly you see either the left or right begin to call for this when SCOTUS rules in a way they don't like.Fuck wishing for chicken bones and accidents. They need term limits.
Yes, I remember many of these arguments from many classes on the subject in high school and college- my way of saying I don't think I know very much about the subtleties of the debate.Ehh... historically Justices have actually had a liberal shift the longer they've been on the bench with the exception of Rehnquist. There are a lot of good arguments for not imposing term limits on Justices, such as allowing them to exercise independent judicial review and not be subject to facing being elected by Congress, or allowing Federal judges from lower courts to lobby/rule in ways to make themselves favorable for the Supreme Court. Then again there are a lot of arguments for it, but mostly you see either the left or right begin to call for this when SCOTUS rules in a way they don't like.
A little redundant a
You mean you were paid well to march in Ferguson as a plant?
I know, you did every thing you could to stop these thugs from destroying their own kin's businesses and cities as they looted and burned the place down, right? All in the name of "justice" of course.
Jealous of Scalia because he has the balls to say what everyone knows is spot on?
Is he even still alive?
What readings make you agree with Scalia ?I don't like his interpretation of the Constitution, but the way he lays out his arguments can be or are sometimes convincing or do make sense (if you look at them in a certain way). There are multiple ways and different theories to interpret law/the US constitution. I just feel like his way of looking at it is antiquated.
It's been a bit, but not so much agree with as I can see how his argument makes sense and/or is valid from a legal sense.What readings make you agree with Scalia ?
Those who agree with you are the only ones you listen to. No matter how foolish their statements are, you assume they are gospel. This is why you are generally wrong about everything.Lol, not your comment, what his words mean to people in the black community.
I've resolved not to assume that I know what they're thinking and instead ask people whose opinions I respect on the matter.
Ironic that you say that.Those who agree with you are the only ones you listen to. No matter how foolish their statements are, you assume they are gospel. This is why you are generally wrong about everything.
You're another one with the same "fact-checking" technique.Ironic that you say that.
You sure do hate facts, don't you.You're another one with the same "fact-checking" technique.