injunction/court case updates

TheRealDman

TheRealDman

Well-Known Member
VIANARCHRIS said:
If she has a case, and we are only hearing one side of the story, she has screwed herself by attempting to hold court on here. If there were incidents of kidnapping or extortion, it would be a police matter and there would be records of the investigation. When one gets kidnapped, their first course of action after escaping, is to report it to the police. She knows who her kidnappers were...charges should have been laid very quickly. It's very likely that somebody skimmed money, and that should be investigated, but claims of kidnap with no supporting evidence casts a lot of doubt.
Click to expand...
Yepper!
 
VIANARCHRIS

VIANARCHRIS

Well-Known Member
Nadine Bews said:
Compliance reporting is my agenda and the Conroy-Wilcox joint personal representative solicitor relationship with a non-lawyer operating as the Coalition initially established the financial reporting format by posting their method of financial disclosure through Facebook posts and Youtube videos and I am merely following suit and posting public notice of my intentions which is a requirements when the public is involved as an investor in a private joint venture.,.
Click to expand...
Do you see how making unsubstantiated claims of kidnapping and extortion on a public forum is not "merely following suit" and hurts your credibility? I'm not saying you shouldn't seek justice if you were wronged, the optics of you arguing your case on here are really bad, imo.
 
bigmanc

bigmanc

Well-Known Member
I toadaso, I fuckin a toadaso. Used and abused 3x over, got called a drunk for whatever reason but I've heard both sides of the story! Apparently Nadine is more of a dictator then a team player and doesn't allow others to give opinions and ideas. Now, that's the other side I have heard. Either way let's see how it unravels.
 
OGEvilgenius

OGEvilgenius

Well-Known Member
VIANARCHRIS said:
Do you see how making unsubstantiated claims of kidnapping and extortion on a public forum is not "merely following suit" and hurts your credibility? I'm not saying you shouldn't seek justice if you were wronged, the optics of you arguing your case on here are really bad, imo.
Click to expand...
I said this in the other thread about this, when I noted this I thought to myself - the RCMP would be involved at this point if this were true. So I just kind of stopped paying attention after that.
 
doingdishes

doingdishes

Well-Known Member
some info anyway

Kirk Tousaw said Justice Phelan suggested the decision would come in the fall during closing submissions in March. But after that Smith was decided by the SCC and we made further submissions in the summer. So that pushed things back. Plus it's a huge case, with tons of documentary evidence, and judges do not get time off after trials to just read stuff and think. They go do more trials. So long delays are normal. Frustrating but normal. I expect something soon but there is no timeline.

I really doubt he's waiting for legislative action (that is likely to take a couple years).

The good news is that while we wait at least the injunction remains in force. If it isn't helping you, you do have the option of starting your own case in a provincial trial court (going to federal court will likely just result in a stay but maybe not).

I also don't see cannabis getting a DIN anytime soon. That process is usually long and funded by big pharma
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top