nogod_
Well-Known Member
Point taken.
You've got me thinking about running parallel strings of 2 COBs in series now. I know generally speaking running parallel is a no-no but what if you ran soft by just running an additional COB (ideally with close or identical voltage) wIred in parallel to each of your existing CoBs. Your heatsink would be sufficient but your spacing might be kinda wonky.
So instead of 4 cobs @ 2a each you had 8 cobs @ 1a each. Would also work if you wanted to try and go the 350ma route on a 200w driver correct?
You've got me thinking about running parallel strings of 2 COBs in series now. I know generally speaking running parallel is a no-no but what if you ran soft by just running an additional COB (ideally with close or identical voltage) wIred in parallel to each of your existing CoBs. Your heatsink would be sufficient but your spacing might be kinda wonky.
So instead of 4 cobs @ 2a each you had 8 cobs @ 1a each. Would also work if you wanted to try and go the 350ma route on a 200w driver correct?
well im running over 1.4 A, where the 185 tops out.
efficiency is lower but im getting 20% more PAR output from each COB (but going from 56 to 53% efficient of course. eventually as i get more cobs ill run them softer on more efficient drivers. for right now i need bang for my buck.
so yes efficiency is important, but is one of many factors. thanks for calling attention to the low efficiency at 115V, ill run it at 240V instead