SAP - IS HILLARY GOIN TO JAIL??

NLXSK1

NLXSK1

Well-Known Member
There were no 'Classified' documents on her e-mail server.

There were however over a thousand confidential, secret and at least a dozen of the most top secret 'Special Access Program' located on there.

SAP is a special category of information where the prosecution does not have to prove intent, just negligence with the data is sufficient for prosecution.

So, is she going to get prosecuted or do all you sycophants believe she is above the law?
 
S

schuylaar

Well-Known Member
NLXSK1 said:
There were no 'Classified' documents on her e-mail server.

There were however over a thousand confidential, secret and at least a dozen of the most top secret 'Special Access Program' located on there.

SAP is a special category of information where the prosecution does not have to prove intent, just negligence with the data is sufficient for prosecution.

So, is she going to get prosecuted or do all you sycophants believe she is above the law?
Click to expand...
If you don't go to jail for crashing the economy..whats all the commotion about?

People like her don't go to jail..they get fined heavily.
 
MuyLocoNC

MuyLocoNC

Well-Known Member
I love the nonsensical argument that the documents weren't classified when they were sent. They keep saying it like it will make everyone forget they were classified while they sat on a non-secure, unauthorized server.
 
NLXSK1

NLXSK1

Well-Known Member
MuyLocoNC said:
I love the nonsensical argument that the documents weren't classified when they were sent. They keep saying it like it will make everyone forget they were classified while they sat on a non-secure, unauthorized server.
Click to expand...
There is no 'Classified' category for documents so her lawyer like answer is technically correct.
 
NLXSK1

NLXSK1

Well-Known Member
schuylaar said:
If you don't go to jail for crashing the economy..whats all the commotion about?

People like her don't go to jail..they get fined heavily.
Click to expand...
This isnt a financial crime, I am not sure there is a monetary penalty. I think it is just jail time.
 
NLXSK1

NLXSK1

Well-Known Member
I am wondering about timing. Right now the FBI would have to forward their findings and recommendation to the justice department which could easily decide not to prosecute.

However, if this dragged on for more than a year then there would be a new administration, one that might be less likely or unable to pardon Mrs. Clinton.
 
desert dude

desert dude

Well-Known Member
Mishandling classified information is a crime, a felony in fact. Markings are irrelevant. Top secret information is top secret whether it is marked "TOP SECRET" or not.

Hillary is guilty of mishandling TS/SCI information. That cannot be disputed. She did it. She might never be charged with a crime, because she has lots of connections, she is still guilty though.

Skylard is correct, I think, about a fine versus prison time. If she is charged, she will probably plead it down to a misdemeanor and pay a fine, just like Patraeus did.

What will be interesting to me is whether she drops her presidential bid when/if she is charged. She might not, and Democrats might vote for her anyway. It will be a delightful spectacle.

I think she will be charged. Just my opinion.
 
londonfog

londonfog

Well-Known Member
NLXSK1 said:
Sending and receiving the most top secret information on an unsecured e-mail server. It happens to be a felony. Have you been paying attention? NM....
Click to expand...
you are right to say never-mind. Quite obvious you are clueless to what crime was committed.
Federal Records Act, which became law in 1950, requires federal employees to keep copies of their communications. In 2014 Obama required federal employees to transfer personal emails to government servers within 20 days. But that change to the law was made after Clinton left the State Department.
Also it will have to show she SENT top secret information. Was it labeled as such at the time she sent it as as such ? don't think so or they would have had her ass already.
Again let me know when you find out the crime she did
 
NLXSK1

NLXSK1

Well-Known Member
londonfog said:
you are right to say never-mind. Quite obvious you are clueless to what crime was committed.
Federal Records Act, which became law in 1950, requires federal employees to keep copies of their communications. In 2014 Obama required federal employees to transfer personal emails to government servers within 20 days. But that change to the law was made after Clinton left the State Department.
Also it will have to show she SENT top secret information. Was it labeled as such at the time she sent it as as such ? don't think so or they would have had her ass already.
Again let me know when you find out the crime she did
Click to expand...
You must be confused. I am not carrying out the investigation. Once the FBI is finished they will give their findings to the Justice department. They are the ones that are probably not interested in playing lawyerly word games with top secret data...

SAP e-mails have a special protocol to even open so she cannot say she did not know what they were.
 
londonfog

londonfog

Well-Known Member
NLXSK1 said:
You must be confused. I am not carrying out the investigation. Once the FBI is finished they will give their findings to the Justice department. They are the ones that are probably not interested in playing lawyerly word games with top secret data...

SAP e-mails have a special protocol to even open so she cannot say she did not know what they were.
Click to expand...
Yeah let me know when they find something. Right now I see nothing. I also suggest you learn what law was broken
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top