APNewsBreak: US declares 22 Clinton emails 'top secret'

C

ChesusRice

Well-Known Member
MuyLocoNC said:
The quoted text in my first post on the subject came DIRECTLY from the CNN article that dropped right after the emails were released. Do you actually dispute the existence of those exact words in an email from Clinton to her staff? If you do, you're hopeless and I tire of your ignorance.
Click to expand...
www.state.gov
Don't follow that link. It's to the state department website
And as we all know everything there is classified top secret
 
MuyLocoNC

MuyLocoNC

Well-Known Member
ChesusRice said:
Cnn mentioned a FAX They were having problems sending. Nothing was mentioned about removing top secret headers. Clinton instructed her aides to send the talking points if they still couldn't get the secure fax to work. State department officials said their network contains non classified documents.
You Sherlock Holmes added 2+2 and came up with 46.
You really are fucking stupid
Click to expand...
ChesusRice said:
On June 16, 2011, top Clinton aide Jake Sullivan wrote to Clinton to say she would get "tps" -- presumably short for "talking points" that evening. The subject of the email is redacted so it's not clear what topic these points covered.


The next morning, Clinton wrote back to say she hadn't received them yet, and after a few minutes Sullivan responded that staff were having issues sending the document in a secure fax but that they were "working on it."

"If they can't," Clinton replies, "turn into nonpaper w no identifying heading and send nonsecure

A State Department official declined to comment on Grassley's statement, but told CNN earlier in the day that the department has "no indication at this time that the document being discussed was emailed to her."

"I'm not going to speculate about whether the document being discussed was classified," this official added. "Generally speaking, I can say that just because a document is sent via a secure method doesn't mean that it's classified. Many documents that are created or stored on a secure system are not classified."
http://www.cnn.com/2016/01/08/politics/hillary-clinton-emails-2016/
Click to expand...
Awesome, you found an article on CNN that isn't the one I pulled from and stand it up as proof of what? Should I pull another article that isn't the one I quoted and spend a couple posts talking about how it doesn't say what the actual article said? We could spend a couple weeks talking about how articles that aren't the one I pulled from, don't state exactly what the one I quoted does state.

You're real good at this, aren't you?
 
C

ChesusRice

Well-Known Member
MuyLocoNC said:
Awesome, you found an article on CNN that isn't the one I pulled from and stand it up as proof of what? Should I pull another article that isn't the one I quoted and spend a couple posts talking about how it doesn't say what the actual article said? We could spend a couple weeks talking about how articles that aren't the one I pulled from, don't state exactly what the one I quoted does state.

You're real good at this, aren't you?
Click to expand...
Link to the one you claim. GO ahead. I'm right here
 
C

ChesusRice

Well-Known Member
MuyLocoNC said:
Here ya go Cheebs.

http://ireport.cnn.com/docs/DOC-91851
Click to expand...
PAGE NOT FOUND

The page you requested cannot be found. The page you are looking for might have been removed, had its name changed, or is temporarily unavailable.


Please try the following:

  • If you typed the page address in the Address bar, make sure that it is spelled correctly.
  • Open the ireport.cnn.com home page and look for links to the information you want.
  • Click the Back button to try another link.
 
MuyLocoNC

MuyLocoNC

Well-Known Member
ChesusRice said:
PAGE NOT FOUND

The page you requested cannot be found. The page you are looking for might have been removed, had its name changed, or is temporarily unavailable.


Please try the following:

  • If you typed the page address in the Address bar, make sure that it is spelled correctly.
  • Open the ireport.cnn.com home page and look for links to the information you want.
  • Click the Back button to try another link.
Click to expand...
Oh, dang it. My bad.

That was a scrubbed article about Bush warning the Democrat controlled Congress for several years, well before the crash, about the problems with the housing market and the disastrous consequences.

Bush saw it coming...Congress did nothing - CNN iReport

How'd that get mixed up in my C&P? Kinda weird they would delete an article like that, seeing how they're unbiased and all.

Oh well, let me get that other article for you.
 
MuyLocoNC

MuyLocoNC

Well-Known Member
ChesusRice said:
CNN iReport - CNN.com
www.cnn.com/specials/opinions/cnnireport
CNN

Loading...
Accepts video, photos and audio from a computer or cell phone. A compilation of news items submitted by citizen journalism.
Click to expand...
Are you now saying that if a "citizen journalist" writes an article about Bush warning Congress 17 times about the impending housing crash, that means he didn't really do it? Is that the new revisionist history tactic? You guys are funny...looking.
 
MuyLocoNC

MuyLocoNC

Well-Known Member
see4 said:
I think what Chesus was getting at, is IF you do post a citation from a "garbage" source, like breitbart or faux noose, you should be prepared to have other citations that can also support it. If you can't, which likely you can't... then the only basis for your information is coming from ONE (un-credible) news source.
Click to expand...
see4 said:
Nobody decides what sources are credible, that's the wonderful thing about facts. You're clearly not bright enough to grasp that concept.
Click to expand...
Did you forget to take your lithium today?
 
UncleBuck

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
MuyLocoNC said:
You don't decide what is or isn't a "garbage" source, I do.
Click to expand...
we let you have that privilege for a while, you started quoting "unskewed polls" like dogma, and got the election result wrong by 18 points.

you lost that privilege via your own stupidity.

MuyLocoNC said:
Sources such as NBC, ABC, CBS, MSNBC, AL JAZEERA, NY TIMES, HUFFPO, etc...are all garbage and shall be given zero credibility.
Click to expand...
nate silver at the NY times predicted the election perfectly in every state. you got it wrong by 18 full points.

your opinion is worthless.

and most importantly, shut the fuck up.
 
Rrog

Rrog

Well-Known Member
The shit is just bizarre that comes from that dude. It's why he's been on ignore since early last year
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top