You haven't "explained" anything.
So, the Answer, without all the oh ha is NO, there is not a unit that compares to a 1000 watt DE, why is that so hard for you guys to say?
You do not know what you are talking about at all, you would need to do a grid of his area, determine how many COB's per square foot you want to use then determine that frequency you want to run them at. It's not just OH 700 watts replaces 1000 watts , really not that simple.
Grasping reality is difficult for these guys.
Tiny ceiling height, not for DE lights, not a good comparison.
why the huge shaded strip down the middle? and what unit is that?
Guess that area don't need coverage LEDs are that awesome apparently. Those lights coverage is tiny its like a 3x3 max with weak coverage on the outter edge.
Comments like these don't further the conversation. You're just defending your ego, which you clearly need to do because you've made a claim and can't back it up. Trying to suggest the inverse square law lowers PPFD without explaining where the light goes is futile. I've already given the explanation. If a light is raised high enough to incur reflective losses the the amount of light reaching the canopy is lowered. In a warehouse setting this is less of a concern than in your closet.
I thought you said you were out of here
I already explained several times where the light has dissipated to, its a law , you cant change physics. I'm done talking to you, welcome to ignore, the place for ignorance.
Truth hurts? Sorry but those are real facts.
Man you just TRY and look for anything to make yourself feel better.
Over grown walkway. They just were over vegged GG#4's.
Falling way outside their designed grow space and still bulked like they should...they must suck.
Weak minds ignore their detractors. Good job. Anyone else care to explain where the light goes if not reflective losses? I can't think of any, but if I'm wrong I'd sure like someone to explain it to me.
Tiny grow area, and super over priced, grats you are making money but those lights aren't as good as DE lights for commercial grow. Just compare a PAR chart between your light and a gavita, its not even close.
again you TRY to put things down...and are as wrong as fuck.
I was talking about the grow area of your light broski. it covers a 2x2 area for 700+ dollars and puts out weaker par ratings than lights for half the price.
Those facts are fudged to prove yourself right. Upfront cost is the only reason using them in a commercial environment wouldn't be better. The lettuce factory was an example of what could be done if you weren't required to hang your light 8 feet above the plant. Obviously with weed you would need more room than lettuce and blurple lights. You cant change the laws of physics (light output per watt) just because you have a larger space. You also wouldnt employ the same techniques as 1000w hids when using multiple smaller light sources.
it's a 300w light...it alone doesn't compare to a 1K and no one said it did. You want a big light...would you like it better if I put 2 inot one house...that would make the light so much more powerful right...fucking idiot learn you shit. Light is cumulative.
