I reread my above statement and one thing I stated is wrong. You dont have to remove the same amount of energy either way because light that hits plants, a % of it is converted into plant material via photosynthesis, so it never actually becomes waste heat, unlike the HPS where a much larger percentage of the total electricity used has to be removed from the grow environment. Along with all the waste heat produced directly by the bulb (and ballast), HPS has a much larger amount of infrared radiation produced, which the plants cant really use, although it can influence their growth via hormonal changes, but this is pretty much all converted to heat upon hitting the plants or enclosure also, so needs to be removed as a waste product. It would be interesting to know how much of the energy consumed by the light, is actually used by the plant. I know that with LED the amount of energy used is much higher than with HPS, which is reflected in people getting up to 2g/w yields under LED, but overall I bet it is still quite low.