Socialist hellhole California moves from 8th to 6th largest economy in the world, surpassing France

choomer

Well-Known Member
Get him to drink pineapple juice a while before and he will not come -get off as bitter he may taste sweet and more to your liking. HOPE THIS HELPS him to taste better to you.
My gay friends say onions make it sweeter, but I'll let Bucky be the judge.

C'mere ya big galoot!
 

Big_Lou

Well-Known Member
You're doing better with the realization than I did when it was pointed out to me by the woman.
I don't know why she stays with such inadequacy.
Huhhh? Nah, man, I was kidding about the "other side of the ruler", I'm actually close to 9". I'm not some sort of massive porn star, but yeah, I was 7"+ when I was enjoying my puberty.
I mean, I'm 6'6", I wear a 17 EEE shoe, and this is my hand:

IMG_1353.JPG

Certainly not some foolish 'internet boast', lol, it just is what it is. (shrugs)

What the hell does this have to do with the thread, anyhow? Maannnnn, maybe one more beer and the rest of this j....
 

kmog33

Well-Known Member
Huhhh? Nah, man, I was kidding about the "other side of the ruler", I'm actually close to 9". I'm not some sort of massive porn star, but yeah, I was 7"+ when I was enjoying my puberty.
I mean, I'm 6'6", I wear a 17 EEE shoe, and this is my hand:

View attachment 3712382

Certainly not some foolish 'internet boast', lol, it just is what it is. (shrugs)

What the hell does this have to do with the thread, anyhow? Maannnnn, maybe one more beer and the rest of this j....
Why did you start with the base of your hand at like 3"?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 

Fogdog

Well-Known Member
Yeah....I know all those liberals that are soooooo much better off than I. It was your post that finally made me realize that with the crushing weight of your conjecture.



SO...you admit suckling @ the teat then from your familiarity? I understand your mistaking your wife for my mother.
I wouldn't want to admit it either.
Have you anything to say about your failed GOP or the superiority of liberal economics? I thought so. Weak sauce.
 

Fogdog

Well-Known Member
Huhhh? Nah, man, I was kidding about the "other side of the ruler", I'm actually close to 9". I'm not some sort of massive porn star, but yeah, I was 7"+ when I was enjoying my puberty.
I mean, I'm 6'6", I wear a 17 EEE shoe, and this is my hand:

View attachment 3712382

Certainly not some foolish 'internet boast', lol, it just is what it is. (shrugs)

What the hell does this have to do with the thread, anyhow? Maannnnn, maybe one more beer and the rest of this j....
He's got nothing. He's just sitting back and chucking rocks at people who are better than he is.
 

Fogdog

Well-Known Member
My gay friends say onions make it sweeter, but I'll let Bucky be the judge.

C'mere ya big galoot!
Wow, what are you doing here? So, let's go back to an assertion I posted to you earlier, and I'm guessing that you can't reply with anything meaningful or on topic:

Here is reality: As a percentage of revenue, CA is among the least reliant on welfare. So, we have a populous state with expanding world class economy and relatively low welfare revenue cost. It's a good thing, wouldn't you agree?
 

Olive Drab Green

Well-Known Member
Huhhh? Nah, man, I was kidding about the "other side of the ruler", I'm actually close to 9". I'm not some sort of massive porn star, but yeah, I was 7"+ when I was enjoying my puberty.
I mean, I'm 6'6", I wear a 17 EEE shoe, and this is my hand:

View attachment 3712382

Certainly not some foolish 'internet boast', lol, it just is what it is. (shrugs)

What the hell does this have to do with the thread, anyhow? Maannnnn, maybe one more beer and the rest of this j....
What the fuuuuuuuuuuuuuuck? Dude, you're a big mother. Like, I'd rock that shit hard.
 

choomer

Well-Known Member
Huhhh? Nah, man, I was kidding about the "other side of the ruler", I'm actually close to 9". I'm not some sort of massive porn star, but yeah, I was 7"+ when I was enjoying my puberty.
I mean, I'm 6'6", I wear a 17 EEE shoe, and this is my hand:

View attachment 3712382

Certainly not some foolish 'internet boast', lol, it just is what it is. (shrugs)

What the hell does this have to do with the thread, anyhow? Maannnnn, maybe one more beer and the rest of this j....
Wow, you went to all that trouble to "prove" to a "sock puppet" that you are truly a massive Masters Of The Universe cocksman.

Isn't that a bit like the psychological discovery that the most homophobic "Manly Men" are latent homosexuals in denial whose every action tries to distance themselves from the brutal truth?

As to content relevant to the thread topic, I trotted out how in California's own May 2016 tax revenue revisions are projected to be $2.2B short from January estimations and how that is representative of the fallacy of the HuffPo article that is the reason for this thread since those same numbers from the article were in the CA report that assures us that even though the revenue numbers are wrong, the projected growth numbers are solid.

Estimations and projection headlines are very prone to corrections months later buried on page 13 or a webpage with unknown URL since it's not linked to from anywhere.

After I 1st posted it there were some dead links most of which have been fixed. But I didn't hear anything other than how it was full of right wing propaganda site content.

When the originating content is being reported in the HuffPo which is as left wing as Fox is right wing, it's silly that someone would expect me to be able to dig up evidence disagreeing with the HuffPo content originating from the Southern Poverty Law Center or some such other liberal agenda site.

But the centerpiece of the post was the link to that May 2016 revision of tax revenue and the excerpts quoted therein and I didn't hear diddly 'bout that.
 

Big_Lou

Well-Known Member
Wow, you went to all that trouble to "prove" to a "sock puppet" that you are truly a massive Masters Of The Universe cocksman.

Isn't that a bit like the psychological discovery that the most homophobic "Manly Men" are latent homosexuals in denial whose every action tries to distance themselves from the brutal truth?

As to content relevant to the thread topic, I trotted out how in California's own May 2016 tax revenue revisions are projected to be $2.2B short from January estimations and how that is representative of the fallacy of the HuffPo article that is the reason for this thread since those same numbers from the article were in the CA report that assures us that even though the revenue numbers are wrong, the projected growth numbers are solid.

Estimations and projection headlines are very prone to corrections months later buried on page 13 or a webpage with unknown URL since it's not linked to from anywhere.

After I 1st posted it there were some dead links most of which have been fixed. But I didn't hear anything other than how it was full of right wing propaganda site content.

When the originating content is being reported in the HuffPo which is as left wing as Fox is right wing, it's silly that someone would expect me to be able to dig up evidence disagreeing with the HuffPo content originating from the Southern Poverty Law Center or some such other liberal agenda site.

But the centerpiece of the post was the link to that May 2016 revision of tax revenue and the excerpts quoted therein and I didn't hear diddly 'bout that.
Whoahhh, you might need some therapy, man.
 

Fogdog

Well-Known Member
But the centerpiece of the post was the link to that May 2016 revision of tax revenue and the excerpts quoted therein and I didn't hear diddly 'bout that.
You want us to respond to projections made from data that were gathered from the first quarter. I mean, so, Hillary is winning in the polls. Why don't we just call the election?

CA by itself is the sixth largest economy. These projections are just that and will flip back and forth all year. Other projections show the state is doing just fine. You are a ditz and not worth spending time pulling up numbers.

Here is a tit for you to suck on, little bacon bit.

http://www.latimes.com/business/la-fi-los-angeles-economy-forecast-20160217-story.html
BUSINESS
California economy is poised to grow in 2016 and 2017, report says
Employers in Los Angeles and the rest of California will keep hiring in the next two years but at a slightly slower pace than in 2015, a new report said.

The state is poised to add more than 650,000 jobs this year and next, pushing down the current 7% unemployment rate to about 5.9% by 2017, according to an annual forecast released Wednesday by the Los Angeles County Economic Development Corp.


After climbing 3% in 2015, nonfarm jobs are expected to rise 2.4% this year and 1.6% in 2017, the report said. The slower pace of growth will also be reflected in the United States overall, and is a natural slowdown more than six years after the Great Recession ended, said Robert Kleinhenz, the group’s chief economist.

The article goes on with nothing but good news regarding jobs in every sector. California with it's informed economic strategy (aka "liberal) is showing the way. Too bad shitty Republican governance dooms states dumb enough to vote the GOP bacon eaters into office to suffer debt, soaring unemployment and bitterness.
 

choomer

Well-Known Member
Whoahhh, you might need some therapy, man.
Ya see, I post something relevant and you cast aspersions on my sanity or equilibrium.

You ask for content, I give it to you and you have nothing to say about that.

But at least it gave you an excuse to play with your dick a bit, didn't it? ;)
 

choomer

Well-Known Member
oh, i know what kind of people have the same visceral hatred for the SPLC as you do.

they are quite unsavory people.
Visceral hatred? There's that famous liberal projection again.

Visceral hatred is the protests that liberals have staged during rallies for that stooge Trump.

I have no hate for the SPLC but some it's actions have seemed in contradiction of their stated goals.

EDIT: Changed the "actions" link to the one I was really thinking about.
 
Last edited:

choomer

Well-Known Member
Wow, what are you doing here? So, let's go back to an assertion I posted to you earlier, and I'm guessing that you can't reply with anything meaningful or on topic:

Here is reality: As a percentage of revenue, CA is among the least reliant on welfare. So, we have a populous state with expanding world class economy and relatively low welfare revenue cost. It's a good thing, wouldn't you agree?
Least reliant on FEDERAL welfare is what your infographic pointed out. CA welfare is a different beast altogether.

But this is you wanting to steer me to your pet argument, and this is me staying with the information casting the truthfulness of the PROJECTION numbers the HuffPo article (it had to come from there with the whole Kansas thing, it was almost copy/pasta) into doubt as they are PROJECTIONS just like, and in the same report as, the January projection for tax revenue that has to be revised 1/2 way into the year to the tune of $2.2B.

EDIT: It was Nebraska Paddy used as the comparison, I knew it was one of those flat boring states.
 
Last edited:

ttystikk

Well-Known Member
Since when has the government given 1 million to someone?

Bad example. The millionare most definitely stimulates the economy just like the 1000 people.

He spends his money as well on his home, eating, taxes, toys, cars, products and services.
You aren't a millionaire, are you?

Because you haven't clue number one what they do or how they live.

They DON'T spend their money, choosing instead to live of the interest.

Rule number one of wealth preservation; DON'T touch the principal!
 
Top