1818 did not match 3590 in my test. not sure why the discrepancy with robin's data. i would expect 3500k 1818 to equal the 3000K 1818 (at least)
the 1818 used in this test came from CDI. the 3590 is a recent CD bin from an april batch with the new gold CREE printing. maybe its a high binner, DB in disguise? maybe CDI has been sitting on the 1818s for a year? who knows.
here are both w/ideal holders on a 140mm pinfin with graphite pads
120mm fan on top of pinfin blowing down
ambient temp 20-22C
I let temps stabilize for the main curves. i also did a pulsed test with 1818 and it couldnt even match the stabilized temp 3590. Pulsed testing was difficult esp at higher currents. anything over 50W by the time i got the current dialed in to exactly where i wanted it the ppfd was dropping like a rock. i could see variations of 5+% in just a few seconds. i need a better isothermal solution like the water block
respectable showing for the 1818 given its price at about half the 3590 but i think 3070 might be a better match
my next test will be 1212 vs 1818 vs 3070
View attachment 3722014