Help choose the next fake scandal

[UncleBuck]

based on what?

the whole motto for this retarded slogan just got assfucked without lube.

give me the next scandal.

 

[BuzzD2Kill]

https://www.facebook.com/video.php?v=1060624633997536

HAHAHAHAHAHA

IF YOU CANT SEE FOREIGN INFLUENCE ON POLITICS INSIDE THE US OF FUCKIN A GTFO. YOU R THE WEAKEST LINK! GET SOME PRIDE U POS'S!

 

[schuylaar]

oh, jesusfuck. are you still crying about this?

get a fucking hold of yourself and choose a new scandal.

'This' is clearly lying..that's the issue.

 

[schuylaar]

Hillary got off on intent. He kept saying intent needed to be found and there was none to be found. That has always been the job of the tryer of fact, the jury. In any other crime like this when one is investigated and found to have been in violation of the law, they would be indited and tried before a jury.

I smell shit.

If bypassing a government server is not intent I don't know what is..she made a definitive decision to do this.

 

[schuylaar]

Russia released the emails that two different espionage agencies stole from her compromised server.

Yet the FBI didn't find anything.

And we're supposed to think there's no corruption in government.

The arrogance of power is breathtaking sometimes.

ROFL..right?

We are pathetic and deserve ourselves.

'But what can we dooooooooooooo..?

Bernie2016!

 

[bluntmassa1]

Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump....

 

[ttystikk]

Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump....

A match made in the hell of American political apathy- or misplaced rage, makes no difference in the final outcome.

 

[Rob Roy]

 

[Indagrow]

She couldn't pronounce Beyoncé.... Lost all the black votes

 

[ThickStemz]

If bypassing a government server is not intent I don't know what is..she made a definitive decision to do this.

I agree with you, I hope that was clear as it was intended to be my point. The FBI presser gentleman kept saying lack of intent, that was his primary focus for a reason to not recommend prosecution. But more importantly, it shouldn't matter, the determination of what is or isn't intent is a matter for the jury to decide. It always has been.

 

[UncleBuck]

I agree with you, I hope that was clear as it was intended to be my point. The FBI presser gentleman kept saying lack of intent, that was his primary focus for a reason to not recommend prosecution. But more importantly, it shouldn't matter, the determination of what is or isn't intent is a matter for the jury to decide. It always has been.

and "no reasonable prosecutor" would try to bring the case in front of a jury. if you're gonna cite what the guy had to say, you can't just pick and choose.

well, you can pick and choose but that only exposes you for the hypocrite you are.

subway.

 

[ThickStemz]

and "no reasonable prosecutor" would try to bring the case in front of a jury. if you're gonna cite what the guy had to say, you can't just pick and choose.

well, you can pick and choose but that only exposes you for the hypocrite you are.

subway.

Dude wtf are you talking about? If an individual named Samantha Gibson was a high level government employee who had the same circumstances as the individual named Hillary Clinton, would law enforcement give her the presumption of innocence? That is something law enforcement doesn't do when ordinary or even less prominent people do something potentially illegal, both have to rely upon juries.

And there would be an army of attorneys willing to make a name by prosecuting Hillary Clinton.

 

[UncleBuck]

Dude wtf are you talking about? If an individual named Samantha Gibson was a high level government employee who had the same circumstances as the individual named Hillary Clinton, would law enforcement give her the presumption of innocence? That is something law enforcement doesn't do when ordinary or even less prominent people do something potentially illegal, both have to rely upon juries.

And there would be an army of attorneys willing to make a name by prosecuting Hillary Clinton.

yet here we are, no charges brought, no indictment, nothing.

your illustrious law career ended when you started stealing from your parents to feed your heroin habit.

 

[ThickStemz]

yet here we are, no charges brought, no indictment, nothing.

your illustrious law career ended when you started stealing from your parents to feed your heroin habit.

It's like you can't read. Have you read it? Does it sound like a glowing exoneration to you? He said what was done was a felony, intentionally treating highly classified documents so recklessly, except Hillary was just negligent. Bullshit.

 

[UncleBuck]

It's like you can't read. Have you read it? Does it sound like a glowing exoneration to you? He said what was done was a felony

maybe someone should bring a lawsuit or try her then, eh?

 

[ttystikk]

maybe someone should bring a lawsuit or try her then, eh?

Ask Vince Foster how that worked out.

 

[Rob Roy]

Ask Vince Foster how that worked out.

Coming soon...

 

[Fogdog]

Just listen at the end he basically says if anyone else where to do what she did they would suffer consequences. So just because she is Shitlary Clinton she is getting off scot free, does seam a lil fucked up.

Ahhh losing the discussion lets just say something retarded and move along.

How in the fuck was this fake? Nothing came from it because of this astoundingly corrupt government we have.

Russia released the emails that two different espionage agencies stole from her compromised server.

Yet the FBI didn't find anything.

And we're supposed to think there's no corruption in government.

The arrogance of power is breathtaking sometimes.

Still going to claim a criminal act in spite of the fact the FBI found no evidence of one. Hanging onto this scandal like all the others. As if an accusation is the same as a trial and guilty verdict.

Did you know that Trump raped a child? Four times. In front of other people, yuck.

 

[ttystikk]

Still going to claim a criminal act in spite of the fact the FBI found no evidence of one. Hanging onto this scandal like all the others. As if an accusation is the same as a trial and guilty verdict.

I don't think you'll maintain a lot of credibility by attempting to deny that she broke the law.

I'm using it as an example of selective enforcement.

BTW, State is still investigating.

 

[Fogdog]

I don't think you'll maintain a lot of credibility by attempting to deny that she broke the law.

I'm using it as an example of selective enforcement.

BTW, State is still investigating.

Look, I don't make shit up. I don't know what happened with those emails. I do know that Sanders isn't running for prez and that the FBI didn't find evidence of criminal act. You can make up whatever you like. I'll continue to stick to the side where reality can be found.