Hillary can't be trusted

Status
Not open for further replies.
Unclebaldrick

Unclebaldrick

Well-Known Member
Unclebaldrick

Unclebaldrick

Well-Known Member
Flaming Pie said:
I feel they are irrelevant to the argument of whether or not Hillary is trustworthy.
Click to expand...
Construct the argument any way you want - it is still TRUMP! or Clinton. Just as it was once Hitler or a bunch of other guys. TRUMP! is a much greater threat. The fact that you and your spouse somehow think national security and international affairs would be better handled by TRUMP! is sad. It shows you are immune to facts and respond only to slogans and buzzwords.

So by not condemning him you are kind of supporting him. I am sure if he wins there will be a nice brown dress you can wear as you keep an eye on your neighbors and report their comings and goings into the national security app. Safety requires it - thank you for your future service to the State.
 
Flaming Pie

Flaming Pie

Well-Known Member
Unclebaldrick said:
Construct the argument any way you want - it is still TRUMP! or Clinton. Just as it was once Hitler or a bunch of other guys. TRUMP! is a much greater threat. The fact that you and your spouse somehow think national security and international affairs would be better handled by TRUMP! is sad. It shows you are immune to facts and respond only to slogans and buzzwords.

So by not condemning him you are kind of supporting him. I am sure if he wins there will be a nice brown dress you can wear as you keep an eye on your neighbors and report their comings and goings into the national security app. Safety requires it - thank you for your future service to the State.
Click to expand...
I feel hillary is a greater threat to national security.

China doesn't like her and neither does the middle east. The muslim brotherhood and Isis love her tho.

Wall street and bankers love her too.
 
Fogdog

Fogdog

Well-Known Member
Flaming Pie said:
I feel hillary is a greater threat to national security.

China doesn't like her and neither does the middle east. The muslim brotherhood and Isis love her tho.

Wall street and bankers love her too.
Click to expand...
You feel that Hillary is a greater national threat. A feeling, not a fact. The fact free life is so less stressful. No conflicting information to trouble the mind.
 
Flaming Pie

Flaming Pie

Well-Known Member
Fogdog said:
You feel that Hillary is a greater national threat. A feeling, not a fact. The fact free life is so less stressful. No conflicting information to trouble the mind.
Click to expand...
I could of said I think, i believe, and so on. Would it have made a difference to you?

The information I have discovered has led me to believe/feel/think that hillary is the worst candidate for president.

Have you looked into the argument against hillary at all? Or do you immediately block out all dissenting opinions as false?

I read the articles everyone posts. I check for citations and then come to a decision on my own without having a site such as politifact telling me what to believe.

If you can't see that CNN is corrupted then you did not look into the DNC emails.

If you cannot see that hillary lies repeatably, then you have not really looked into it.

Do you think it is ok that her foundation recieved millions from foreign governments that she was in negotiations with as secretary of state?

Do you think it is ok that she lies and misleads the public at every opportunity?

Do you think it is ok that CNN does not give her the same scrutiny as they give trump and other candidates?

Do you think it is ok to ban all semiautomatic guns?

Do you think it is ok to push for the removal of foreign government leaders?

Do you think we should have completely open borders and let people into our country that do not have proof of identity?

The FBI said her private server as Secretary of State was less secure than a Gmail account. What if she decides to do that again?

So please tell me why you think she is trustworthy. Noone here has actually posted why THEY think she is trustworthy.

I have explained my position. Now it's your turn.
 
Unclebaldrick

Unclebaldrick

Well-Known Member
Flaming Pie said:
I could of said I think, i believe, and so on. Would it have made a difference to you?

The information I have discovered has led me to believe/feel/think that hillary is the worst candidate for president.

Have you looked into the argument against hillary at all? Or do you immediately block out all dissenting opinions as false?

I read the articles everyone posts. I check for citations and then come to a decision on my own without having a site such as politifact telling me what to believe.

If you can't see that CNN is corrupted then you did not look into the DNC emails.

If you cannot see that hillary lies repeatably, then you have not really looked into it.

Do you think it is ok that her foundation recieved millions from foreign governments that she was in negotiations with as secretary of state?

Do you think it is ok that she lies and misleads the public at every opportunity?

Do you think it is ok that CNN does not give her the same scrutiny as they give trump and other candidates?

Do you think it is ok to ban all semiautomatic guns?

Do you think it is ok to push for the removal of foreign government leaders?

Do you think we should have completely open borders and let people into our country that do not have proof of identity?

The FBI said her private server as Secretary of State was less secure than a Gmail account. What if she decides to do that again?

So please tell me why you think she is trustworthy. Noone here has actually posted why THEY think she is trustworthy.

I have explained my position. Now it's your turn.
Click to expand...


So many logical flaws in your post Pie. It says a lot about what you accept as the truth.
 
Flaming Pie

Flaming Pie

Well-Known Member
Have you seen the video where hillary brings up assassination while explaining why she wont drop out of the 2008 race?

That is very different from trump saying maybe the 2A folks could do something about preserving the second amendment.

There are legal methods to take but ultimately if hillary succeeds in outlawing semiauto firearms then the defenders of the second will nlt give in on that. They will fight legally as long as possible. If a hillary administration outlaws possession of semi autos and uses the registry to crack down on owners.. that would time when people would become violent.

The second amendment was put in place to allow people to protect themselves from enemies foreign and domestic. If they start demanding people turn in their guns then there will be a large push back.

Democrats and Republicans have been slowly chipping away at our Constitution and there will be a time when people say "enough is enough".

I don't see anything wrong with his statement. Now if he had said, "second amendment folks will take care of hillary *wink wink*" then THAT would of been a big deal. No wink even needed.

What he said was, "If she gets to pick her judges, nothing you can do, folks," he said at a rally in Wilmington, N.C., to boos from the crowd. "Although the Second Amendment people ... maybe there is, I don't know."
 
Unclebaldrick

Unclebaldrick

Well-Known Member
Flaming Pie said:
Why do you think she is trustworthy?
Click to expand...
I don't. But i think she is stable and will do a reasonably good job running thr country compared to the realistic alternative. TRUMP! Is an attrocity exhibition waiting to happen. He knows just how to appeal to certain people's dark side. Those people are lunatics.
 
Flaming Pie

Flaming Pie

Well-Known Member
Unclebaldrick said:
I don't. But i think she is stable and will do a reasonably good job running thr country compared to the realistic alternative. TRUMP! Is an attrocity exhibition waiting to happen. He knows just how to appeal to certain people's dark side. Those people are lunatics.
Click to expand...
Why don't you trust her?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top