From the link you posted as "proof":
For there to be criminal conflict of interest, there would have to be evidence showing a government employee received something of value in exchange, such as a job post-employment or money.
There doesn't appear to be anything so far suggesting that in the newly released heavily redacted emails from Judicial Watch, but those emails do raise questions about whether the relationship between the State Department and Clinton Foundation was too cozy, particularly after Clinton pledged she would not be involved with the foundation when she became secretary of state in an effort to prevent an inappropriate relationship.
In fact, this "proof" of corruption is not that at all. No facts but a lot of questions by people who would benefit if the rumor were true. And no evidence, just questions. This is just another smear. And doesn't even involve the Clintons.
I smell another investigation that ends with the reactionary right and left -- full of fury but goes nowhere. Rumors, discussions of possible investigations, misquotes, and in the end, the "damning" document contains nothing substantial.
On the other hand, I will give Pie credit for providing the citation. I don't know why she couldn't read the whole thing. I suspect confirmation bias but that's just my opinion.
