Good idea with hydrotonThanks dudeyeah, its a shame the seeds isn't found anywhere now..
No, the hydroton is my top layer only, to prevent evaporation. I grow in soil..
I have a plastic tray in the bottom of my tent which i water in.

Good idea with hydrotonThanks dudeyeah, its a shame the seeds isn't found anywhere now..
No, the hydroton is my top layer only, to prevent evaporation. I grow in soil..
I have a plastic tray in the bottom of my tent which i water in.
Can any of you up to date techies recommend a driver for running 4 vero 18's at nominal current?
Thanks brother @cdgmoney250Vero 18's Nominal Test Current is 1.05A with a Forward Voltage of 29.5V using about 31W each.
Meanwell HLG-120H-C1050 is good up 150W so you could comfortably drive 4 chips on that driver.
http://www.mouser.com/Search/m_ProductDetail.aspx?Mean-Well/HLG-120H-C1050B/&qs=%2bmCJZPMmHFM3geOPLGRO6Q==
Hope this helps.
All things vero huh.......
Vero's are fucking hot! minus well run an air cooled d/e yeah?
CXB 3590's running cooler fasho.... CXA 3070's too.
How about the Citizens chips ?!?!??!?
V6 and V7 at up to 3A is below. i wouldnt run the V6 to 4.2A but the V7 would do better and would be about as efficient as a 3590 is when run at 3A
View attachment 3768029
Same layout as cxb3590 on left.@weed-whacker
Bridgelux has plenty of distributors already. Hard to buy them direct. I will not be stocking them. Will share an update if i see any at Jerry/Future/Digi.
I hear cost is same for Vero B and D around $21-$23. The 70V Vero C will be more expensive $28-$29
I have not been able to find the 90 CRI spectrum for bridgelux Vero 29. For 80 CRI i will go with Vero 29 instead of Citizen because i do not mind soldering and like the Vero 29 design.
Right is Gen 6, Left and center is Gen 7
View attachment 3778240
Which one is what. find here
https://www.rollitup.org/t/new-vero-cob.912433/page-3#post-12921422
whats up with veros miniplugs are they garbage?I have not been able to find the 90 CRI spectrum for bridgelux Vero 29. For 80 CRI i will go with Vero 29 instead of Citizen because i do not mind soldering and like the Vero 29 design.
yeah those were based on 36V versions. from what i understand is unlike crees the different voltage veros are different die layouts and that 72V one sure looks like a beastDoesnt the voltage of the new v7 vero's matter? I will likely be looking at the ~56v version
@weed-whacker
Bridgelux has plenty of distributors already. Hard to buy them direct. I will not be stocking them. Will share an update if i see any at Jerry/Future/Digi.
I hear cost is same for Vero B and D around $21-$23. The 70V Vero C will be more expensive $28-$29
I have not been able to find the 90 CRI spectrum for bridgelux Vero 29. For 80 CRI i will go with Vero 29 instead of Citizen because i do not mind soldering and like the Vero 29 design.
Right is Gen 6, Left and center is Gen 7
View attachment 3778240
Which one is what. find here
https://www.rollitup.org/t/new-vero-cob.912433/page-3#post-12921422
https://www.aliexpress.com/item/Wat..._1&btsid=149d9297-0614-4ffd-a196-217c1f044485
sorry for the interruption,but after hours of reading i cant tell if this one will power a single vero29 driven at 1,4A? they should run at ~51W put the driver only provides 50
i just cant see that number being right...... the 72V data from both the datasheet and the simulator gives some really unrealistic numbers at low currents - like 250 lm/W and above. which would be a serious game changer but i see no reason why it would be so divergent from multiple manufacturers designs (including their own 36V V7 i tested), which converge at low currents. this was generated by simulator generated lumen values, which were equated to par intensity on my readings and finally normallized to ppfd/W@robincnn
will ur site have the new verO? how Much?
did i hear you say all voltage variants will cost the same?
reconsidering citizen in favour of new vero BXRC-40E10K0-C-7X
View attachment 3777716
i just cant see that number being right...... the 72V data from both the datasheet and the simulator gives some really unrealistic numbers at low currents - like 250 lm/W and above. which would be a serious game changer but i see no reason why it would be so divergent from multiple manufacturers designs (including their own 36V V7 i tested), which converge at low currents. this was generated by simulator generated lumen values, which were equated to par intensity on my readings and finally normallized to ppfd/W
View attachment 3780371
I can almost guarantee he used 85*C. He was talking just recently about how real world impossible running at 25*C even is.Values used for this simulations, from datasheet i assume; which values do you use, 25° or 85°C case temp? Tc 25 would not be realistic values for use in a real setup. Looks a bit too good to be true although i believe the values will line up with the top numbers in ur comparison.