Trump appointees
- Thread starter Corso312
- Start date
potroastV2
Well-Known Member
This is eerily similar to 2000 when the idiot Bush filled his cabinet almost entirely with graduates of Liberty University, none of them qualified for the job. At least he had someone to go to church with on Sunday!
Freddie Millergogo
Well-Known Member
There is a big difference between the Archs and Engineers for 9/11 Truth versus AGW academic scientists.You do see how your statement lends credence to Architects and Engineers for 9/11 truth because as of today 2,712 of them question the official story (so technically 1000's) yet ALL elected presidents since have supported the "official" version that Building 7 was struck by a piece of falling debris and therefore collapsed at free fall speed because of it?
I mean, since scientists, engineers, and architects are all accredited graduated scholars.
The 9/11 group for truth has no economic or financial incentive to try to find the truth.
The AGW scientists usually have an economic benefit. I know a bit about university research and it is amazingly corrupt. We are talking about tens of billions in grant money.
Until AGW scientists create a model to factor in the variability of solar radiation then they are full of sh*t. The Sun is the biggest f***king game in our solar system and the biggest variable in the variability of temperature on earth. This argument that people exposing the AGW fraud are anti science is nonsense. The global warming gang are anti science because they can NEVER explain how variations in solar activity fit into their models. They just ignore the sun like a little child covering their ears and yelling.
They never never ever can account for how the Sun fits into the equation.
What a joke.
Fogdog
Well-Known Member
Yep, 2016 is definitely the hottest year on record. Those scientists working for middle class wages are definitely liars. But not Exon's lobbyists. They are who we should all be listening to. Not those shills who have been studying the subject for half a century. Exxon has no financial incentives to argue against curbing use of fossil fuels.
Ocean temperatures rising, glaciers melting, migrations of species into places that had been too cold for them, coral reef bleaching. Taken together, one might think that gang of scientists (too fuuny this) were telling truth. Any child can look at this graph and say that the gangster meteorologists are just making the shit up. (snicker)
Freddie Millergogo
Well-Known Member
Yep, 2016 is definitely the hottest year on record. Those scientists working for middle class wages are definitely liars. But not Exon's lobbyists. They are who we should all be listening to. Not those shills who have been studying the subject for half a century. Exxon has no financial incentives to argue against curbing use of fossil fuels.
Ocean temperatures rising, glaciers melting, migrations of species into places that had been too cold for them, coral reef bleaching. Taken together, one might think that gang of scientists (too fuuny this) were telling truth. Any child can look at this graph and say that the gangster meteorologists are just making the shit up. (snicker)
Nonsense. Any child or anyone who has taken a basic statistic course in college would ask about how the data was derived. How do you derive a sample temperature for the entire globe over 100+ years.
How does the sun and the variations in solar radiation effect the global temperature?
Do global warmists even know that the output of the sun varies? The AGW gang always loves to think man can effect the planet. Sorry - we are insignificant. The sun is a billion times more of a factor than "greenhouse" gases. The AGW gang never ever even talks about the sun so any supposed scientific conclusion they reach, not taking the sun into account, is nonsense.
These AH's never talk about a real catastrophic environmental issue that has not been fixed and may never be fixed - Fukishima. The money wasted on the AGW fraud could have been used on Fuki though I doubt it can ever be fixed. The probability that the Pacific Ocean may die from Fuki is much higher than AGW causing calamity. AGW is a money grab.
Big_Lou
Well-Known Member
Now you are just being foolish, man.....do you really think Melania is capable of sentient thought?
choomer
Well-Known Member
Solar weather, but the sun has been cooling for at least a decade.
The sun is the source of all energy in our solar system yet some discount it's massive influence.
But National Geographic didn't back in 2007:
http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2007/02/070228-mars-warming.html
.....but that still doesn't explain why OTHER planets are not warming at the same rate....except.
Each planet is further out from the sun and each seasons are still not that well understood as we haven't really had much data to work with since theory to project the temp of each planet is maybe a century old.
I AM NOT saying that we aren't fucking up the planet at a astronomic rate!!!!
Fukashima, Chernobyl, Bopal, Oregon Coast "anomolies" (I have a friend in marine biology @ OSU), etc.
We ARE having an effect but why aren't the companies responsible for these atrocities seen as the most likely suspects?
$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$
Fogdog
Well-Known Member
Are you asking how that data was derived or just questioning it. And forget the graph. Glaciers melting, species migration, Ocean hot spots where temperatures are causing species die-offs, the erosion of the Mississippi delta, Islands that have been inhabited for thousands of years are disappearing. All these events are exactly what one would expect in global warming.
You are mixing man made events. Yes, Fuki can cause great harm but nothing on the order of 3 degree global temperature rise. And the two events are independent of each other. Both can happen.
You just say that chart is random statistics. Umm, no. That trend chart is not random. Anyone who has taken a basic statistics course AND REMEMBERED what they learned would know this.
LOL, "do scientists understand there is a sun?" What a joke show your post was.
choomer
Well-Known Member
Check Hitlery's inner thigh for a "Whore of Babylon" tattoo made from acrid aged rhinoceros blood.
Fogdog
Well-Known Member
The "blob" of warm water off the coast is causing havoc with ocean life in the PNW. By itself this formation of warm water off the PNW coast isn't proof of global warming. Taken together with other events around the world, global warming is proven to be taking place.
"Other planets are warming too." The problem with this claim that all other planets are warming at the same rate as the earth is very amusing. Why do I laugh at this assertion?
- First, global warming deniers denying the earth is warming at all. Why then do they make this claim?
- Second, its not true. Some planets are warming others are not.
- Third, other than earth, solar planet temperature data are scarce. We have no long term record of solar planetary temperature.
Fukushima, Chernobyl and Bhopal are independent man caused disasters. Why even mention them in a discussion regarding AGW?
You must know that the fossil fuel industry in it's official publications acknowlege the effects of fossil fuels is having on global warming. They acknowledged this back in the 1980's or earlier. They hired lobbyists and "think tanks" to spread doubt using the same methods the tobacco industry did when they denied their product caused cancer and emphysema. Same with the asbestos industry. They aren't refuting the claims, just seeding doubt. Very effective delay tactic. Every day that Exxon operates freely is hugely profitable.
Which islands?
Fogdog
Well-Known Member
Clinton is so yesterday. Why are you obsessed with her?
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
they got their fascist elected, still not happy.
they won't even be happy after the muslims and mexicans get rounded up.
hell, i doubt they'll even be happy once trump starts rounding up the jews and blacks.
choomer
Well-Known Member
Since it's still been less than a week since she could have had a significant effect on my future (and her rampant criminality).
Why are you so dead set on side tracking any focus on her criminal acts?
Fogdog
Well-Known Member
Wow, melting down much? I don't think anything will sway you. If you want to know more about the industry of global warming denial, which, by the way is much more profitable than studying it, you can start here: http://phys.org/news/2013-12-koch-brothers-reveals-funders-climate.html
Here is an article on Exxon's knowlege about AGW from forty years ago. https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/exxon-knew-about-climate-change-almost-40-years-ago/
I was agreeing with you and providing details to others. Why so bitchy? Are you experiencing some sort of Male PMS?
Since you wiped out the text that you are disagreeing with, I have no idea what you are talking about. Come to think of it, that describes most of your posts.
Last edited:
Big_Lou
Well-Known Member
choomer
A person - usually male - who partakes in physical bonding by such means as cuddling, touching or mock-wrestling. Such actions are jocular and often done in high spirits, such as after a few drinks or in the sports changing rooms.
"That Tim is a real choomer - he keeps cuddling me."
choomer
A person who is involved with the act of chooming. A child-man who remains in an adolescent state where physical touching is neither adult nor child. Choomers rely on masculine physical touching (pawing) to demonstrate their feelings. This physical touching becomes their distinctive display of self.