Highest strain big yielders?

B

bryan oconner

Well-Known Member
usually . high as fuck thc wont pull shit . suggest a skunk or ak 47 but only 8 to 15 %lol good luck with that 30% on any thing never seen that before . should start a thread highest thc you ever have tested bet we get a lot of bs answers for sure.
 
B

bryan oconner

Well-Known Member
its like drinking . would you rather drink beer all night with the buddies have a good time or drink some 140 proof be soggy in 2 minutes pass out i dont have fun that way . fuck the 30 %
 
Nugachino

Nugachino

Well-Known Member
I like the 15-22% stuff. It gets me stoned. But not to the point where I'm incapable of simple conversation. If you want super high potency. You should do dabs. That shit will knock you on your ass.
 
Grojak

Grojak

Well-Known Member
I'm going to say it... 30% does not exist. Argue all you want (if you wish to) but 30% does not exist.

It's really strange how 4 years ago 25% was considered holy shit balls thas outragious and if you were looking at lab test 4-5 years ago you'd be hard pressed to find a 25%. Weed became legal in 2 states and within 6 months there were multiple 30%'s and I'm thinking ok somethings wrong here. So I did my research and I found very fucked up results. Grape Ape testing at 28%, Blackberry Kush 26% at the same lab sampls a few months earlier you could still see results of and the Grape Ape was a 16% BK something like that too. My point those plants didn't get grown THAT much better one time the results or rather the way the calculated it had been changed, don't ask me how but obviously your weed is going to sell more if its rated higher in THC.
 
Roger A. Shrubber

Roger A. Shrubber

Well-Known Member
a lot of the super high thc samples probably come from a very small percentage of growers. if you give a shmuck a seed with genetics potentially capable of 30% thc, the chances of him achieving that are very slim. on the other hand, if you give an experienced, knowledgeable, talented grower the same seed, he just might get there. i've given a friend a seed and started one of the same myself, and mine was twice the size and twice the potency of his (he has been making huge improvements, however, i expect him to pass me soon 8) )

and how many growers actually get their weed tested? i wouldn't mind, but its expensive, and my area is currently not legal, so i'd rather not have mail coming from weed testing labs. if you had a much broader set of samples for statistics, the picture would certainly change, just not sure how
 
B

bryan oconner

Well-Known Member
You can hit the top notch dispen . find nothing tested over 25 % and there are thousands of people dropping samples off . and e dry person. Will tell them there's is the best. !
 
Dr. Who

Dr. Who

Well-Known Member
NoWaistedSpace said:
When mentioned Chemdog, I was using the Next Harvest as an example I guess. I have some older Chemdog from GreenHouse Seeds and some other big names. I'm sure there is another winner in that Chemdog line. It would have the same ancestors in the genetics. Right?
Click to expand...
Many times the "named" strain from seed makers/breeders are "rebuilds" of the original.......I would have great doubt that GH seeds CD was any strain of the actual chemdog! There are places/ways to get some - you have to find them...Try Greenthumb for #4....
 
Dr. Who

Dr. Who

Well-Known Member
Roger A. Shrubber said:
a lot of the super high thc samples probably come from a very small percentage of growers. if you give a shmuck a seed with genetics potentially capable of 30% thc, the chances of him achieving that are very slim. on the other hand, if you give an experienced, knowledgeable, talented grower the same seed, he just might get there. i've given a friend a seed and started one of the same myself, and mine was twice the size and twice the potency of his (he has been making huge improvements, however, i expect him to pass me soon 8) )

and how many growers actually get their weed tested? i wouldn't mind, but its expensive, and my area is currently not legal, so i'd rather not have mail coming from weed testing labs. if you had a much broader set of samples for statistics, the picture would certainly change, just not sure how
Click to expand...
I've gotten close.....
I always wondered how they count those tested and posted in HT. I find High Times as rather misleading anyway.....Just who does their testing.....Shit, even here you can send it to 2-3 different labs and get 2-3 different reports....ya know?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top