Middle of the road price point and decent results. As I stated earlier, if I'm not getting the results I want at any point, I'll switch to HPS. The lights run really cool and cover the space that I need. If the lights were that terrible, no one would be getting resultsConsidering your OP I find it incredible that you would choose Mars for a variety of well reported reasons
RIU has a huge and highly informative LED section
Wow, so glad you came across my thread! Thanks again!! I can't believe how great she looks just 24 hours after taking that half-dead top off! This is 24 hour growth with the Single LED 30" above the tops. I will be lowering the light back down to 24" today, but I wanted to see if I could get just a little stretch on this 4 way. (I'd say mission accomplished!)to the big one with the top gone...for the moment let her be. when the 4 mains will grow a bit more, you will just tie them down gently(!!!) with some nice hemp rope
I'm pretty determined and there's not much stopping me now. I definitely don't see me losing interest, although I need to! lolLooks like you are having a good time in this learning experience. Go strong, go long.... Hope you get em to the finish line!
What makes these lights so bad besides the bad craftsmanship? Of course, if diodes burn out, I understand that. However, if these lights are 260 real watts and I'm going to have two of them, what would make you think only 2-5 ounces are possible? People are still getting .5-1g per real watt with these panels. Do you really think I'll only average .05-.2 gpw with Mars Hydro? Why would people continue to buy them?Not to talk shit on OP, but Mars and all panel LEDs have serious problems competing with other lighting systems. You might get 2-5 ounces if you're lucky. Mars, in particular is known for terrible craftsmanship and failure. If you absolutely HAD to go with an LED panel, I used to use ViparSpectras for my home grow (they are now in use elsewhere) and I liked them. $150 for a ViparSpectra V450 (206 real watts), solid work, not really prone to failure, similar aesthetics and standard options as Platinum/Advanced Platinum, however! For $50 more, you could get a COB from Tasty at $205 that would provide more PPFD than two V450s put together, using only 85w. You would probably get closer to 1.5gpw pretty easily using COB. I use 3 single emitters with their own individual drivers, and I am getting the PPFD of a 600w HPS for only 241w. And I could visibly see the difference, from the first day my plant was above ground and upright.
A single COB will probably be good for one decent-sized plant, but if you can get 3 emitters,you can do at least a 4.5x4.5 grow area as long as you have a high enough amperage.
Yes, very likely. And 2-5 ounces is typical for panel LEDs when used by someone who knows what they are doing. They just don't typically have the PPFD required to grow more.What makes these lights so bad besides the bad craftsmanship? Of course, if diodes burn out, I understand that. However, if these lights are 260 real watts and I'm going to have two of them, what would make you think only 2-5 ounces are possible? People are still getting .5-1g per real watt with these panels. Do you really think I'll only average .05-.2 gpw with Mars Hydro? Why would people continue to buy them?
Well it's not like my money is wasted. The light seems to be doing just fine for seedlings and veg growth. Very fast growth with no heat problems. Luckily, I haven't even bought the second one yet. You're pushing me back towards HPS for flowering though. I'm out of the loop as far as cobs, drivers, emitters and such, but I'm sure Its nothing more than a quick google search away.Yes, very likely. And 2-5 ounces is typical for panel LEDs when used by someone who knows what they are doing. They just don't typically have the PPFD required to grow more.
And people continue to buy them because they find RIU after the fact and because the Chinese company that makes them talks them up in their advertising.
Get COBs. Timber, Tasty, GrowMau5/Cutter, Johnson, etc.Well it's not like my money is wasted. The light seems to be doing just fine for seedlings and veg growth. Very fast growth with no heat problems. Luckily, I haven't even bought the second one yet. You're pushing me back towards HPS for flowering though. I'm out of the loop as far as cobs, drivers, emitters and such, but I'm sure Its nothing more than a quick google search away.
Like I've said before, I want the highest quality yield for my space, and if two of these lights is going to cause me the disappointment of only 2-5 ounces, I definitely want to change out for something better. 600w HPS?
People get results from CFL toMiddle of the road price point and decent results. As I stated earlier, if I'm not getting the results I want at any point, I'll switch to HPS. The lights run really cool and cover the space that I need. If the lights were that terrible, no one would be getting results
Gotta find something in the $200 range for this first grow. Once I get back to work and have to worry about heat and electric this Summer, I will definitely check these out! Just can't justify dropping 500-600 on a light right now with a few more months of Winter left for me. I know it will save me on electric in the long run, and I love not worrying about heat, so when I expand to my bigger flowering room this is most likely what I will use. What's my $200-$300 alternative that will beat out the yield from the original 2 LEDs?
You will be disappointed in yeild I promise you that but your quality will probably be really good it would be cheaper to retrofit what you bought with some quantum boards than it would be to switch to hpsWell it's not like my money is wasted. The light seems to be doing just fine for seedlings and veg growth. Very fast growth with no heat problems. Luckily, I haven't even bought the second one yet. You're pushing me back towards HPS for flowering though. I'm out of the loop as far as cobs, drivers, emitters and such, but I'm sure Its nothing more than a quick google search away.
Like I've said before, I want the highest quality yield for my space, and if two of these lights is going to cause me the disappointment of only 2-5 ounces, I definitely want to change out for something better. 600w HPS?
I'm looking at dogital ballasts from HTG. I'd like to get a 600w system for when I expand, but will this be too much light for 3 plants in a 2x4 space? I may be better of going with 400wYou will be disappointed in yeild I promise you that but your quality will probably be really good it would be cheaper to retrofit what you bought with some quantum boards than it would be to switch to hps
600W should be fine you just need to make sure you can exhaust that heat, that's gonna involve investing in an inline fan.I'm looking at dogital ballasts from HTG. I'd like to get a 600w system for when I expand, but will this be too much light for 3 plants in a 2x4 space? I may be better of going with 400w
I currently have 4" ducts with inline exhaust fan, but no intake fan. If I do go HPS, I will change exhaust ducting to 6" and get a stronger fan. And I'll use my 4" inline to push cool air in from outside. Heat shouldn't be an issue.600W should be fine you just need to make sure you can exhaust that heat, that's gonna involve investing in an inline fan.
Masters pack is on it's way. "5 ML Master Pack 16 oz Buddha Grow, 16 oz Buddha Bloom, 16 oz Trinity, 8 oz Amino Aide, 8 oz Big Swell, 8 oz Ancient Amber, 8 oz Extreme Serene, 8 oz HP2, 8 oz HPK, 1.8 oz Oregonism XL. This nutrient line is designed to be used in potting soil."Look into Roots Organics. I would recommend the dry nutes, but they have a liquid nutes player pack, as well.