Russia didn't do it

tangerinegreen555

Well-Known Member
I agree with Padwan.

Also, why isnt more time being spent on figuring out how to stop this in the future rather than simply pointing fingers at each other. Any hacks into government computer systems underline a total failure of the Obama administration for the last 8 years. Given that they couldnt program a single website for a billion dollars and longer than WWII it is not surprising however.
The official report is coming out shortly.

And no matter what the fuck it says, you idiots will deny it. Truth is just a fucking obstacle in the right's way, particularly over the last 6 years. It's not about objective thought to you, it's about how to rationalize foreign espionage being cool since it helped your guy.
 

Flaming Pie

Well-Known Member
Stop posting child pornography and claiming it has to do with some grand conspiracy. What you do on your own is vile and we want nothing to do with it.
^this is what im talking about.

Most people see that the "art" is glorification of child abuse.

Can't speak in generalities here lol. People lose their minds!
 

dandyrandy

Well-Known Member
Wikileaks released a ton of shit on bush.Pretty sure they released a shitload of diplomatic cables of past several decades too.


Maybe if you weren't so combative somebody would fill you in.

Do you even Wikileaks?

:bigjoint:
What branch? I was in crypto and know a lot about russian espionage. Part of the training. We didn't get it off the internet. You do know it all could be made up correct? Like trumps sexual escapades.
 

Justin-case

Well-Known Member
You keep saying this but there is no confirmation. The DNC and RNC do not share the same server network....

Hillary took herself down. Until the evening of the election Hillary still thought she was gonna win. That wasnt the work of the Russians.



By
SHANE HARRIS,

DEVLIN BARRETT and

JULIAN E. BARNES
Updated Dec. 16, 2016 12:27 a.m. ET
1736 COMMENTS
Russian hackers tried to penetrate the computer networks of the Republican National Committee, using the same techniques that allowed them to infiltrate its Democratic counterpart, according to U.S. officials who have been briefed on the attempted intrusion.

But the intruders failed to get past security defenses on the RNC’s computer networks, the officials said. And people close to the investigation said it indicated a less aggressive and much less persistent effort by Russian intelligence to hack the Republican group than the Democratic National Committee. Only a single email account linked to a long-departed RNC staffer was targeted.
 

Padawanbater2

Well-Known Member
^this is what im talking about.

Most people see that the "art" is glorification of child abuse.

Can't speak in generalities here lol. People lose their minds!
Just wondering, what do you think is wrong with depicting child abuse in art?

I think art can be used to send a powerful message, and certainly in some cases, even change the world. The picture of the man standing in Tiananmen Square, Thích Quảng Đức's self-immolation during the Buddhist crisis, etc.. I think depicting horrible images in art sends a big message to some of those that can't really experience it for themselves. I know just looking at images of the buildings in Auschwitz sends a deep chilling feeling down my spine, so when I think of the Holocaust, those are the images and feelings that I remember. Depicting such abuses in art, while not so easy on the eye is important because it makes people think about them, it makes people consider the morality of something like slavery. Art helps us to understand a little bit more about the human condition, even if some might find it deplorable to look at.
 

HAF2

Well-Known Member
Wikileaks released a ton of shit on bush.Pretty sure they released a shitload of diplomatic cables of past several decades too.


Maybe if you weren't so combative somebody would fill you in.

Do you even Wikileaks?

:bigjoint:
Hodor
 

Padawanbater2

Well-Known Member
Russia didn't "hack the election", if anything, they exposed what the DNC did during the primary and exposing their conduct in favor of Clinton is what lost them the election. Although I have yet to hear from anyone who criticizes Russian involvement who also believes that's what led to Clinton's loss. They all think the Comey letter is why Clinton lost the election. (rofl)

So.. that begs the question.. if the "Russian hacks" didn't lost Clinton the election, why are these same people so vehemently vocal about it?

"Because DEMOCRACY Padawan! Don't you care about democracy!?"

Oh, sure I do, I remember when the DNC was subverting it back during the primary and the same people screaming about the legitimacy of democracy now were calling me an idiot then..


Remember when I said that would come back to bite them in the ass?
 
Top