doublejj
Well-Known Member
I just watch that again the other day. I forgot Charlie Sheen was even in the movie. They don't make them like that any more.....
I just watch that again the other day. I forgot Charlie Sheen was even in the movie. They don't make them like that any more.....
I just watch that again the other day. I forgot Charlie Sheen was even in the movie. They don't make them like that any more.....
That part wasn't for you but for the Blue Cuck Crew.You lost me with nib and babaloo. So Hodor seemed to be the only thing to say.
Now that we've negated that little canard, you have nothing to say about the rest of the post?Is that the same kind of "assumptive nature" that leads you to believe trump is going to be good for America?
It's hard for me to hear what you're saying over how loud you are patting yourself on the back.That part wasn't for you but for the Blue Cuck Crew.
It was in the 1st post of our exchange that you replied to, and you didn't have a problem then, so I assumed you could negotiate it this time too.
You quoted it too! Have a look.
Now that we've negated that little canard, you have nothing to say about the rest of the post?
Does it start becoming inconvenient?
Nice dodge.It's hard for me to hear what you're saying over how loud you are patting yourself on the back.
What is it you want to talk about? I was trying to talk about trump. Then other people kept bringing up Hilary and Obama (like you did a couple times).
Do you have a question for me on what I feel about trump and his actions thus far? Type more clearly I'm having a hard time understanding what you are trying to say.
yes they did.The voters, (the real ones), have spoken
Redickulous question.Nice dodge.
That's been known to happen when inconvenient to compare the historical track record of presidents and presidential candidates to what a presidential elect might do.
Alrighty then if you REALLY want to stay on topic:
Can you post the proof of Russian hacking the election in favor of Donald Trump?
that's your other go-to. pretend you were talking about some other gay kenyan muslim who is responsible for united states policies at the executive level.'Bout fuggin time you posted that Buckold. It's only taken months of your empty accusations for you to prove they have no basis in fact.
Did it take this long for you to get Babaloo and Crustin to stop twiddling your nib so you could hunt that up?
Thanks for posting proof of your assumptive nature as I don't see anywhere in that quoted sentence that I type "Obama", but it does demonstrate how easy it is w/ just a little bait to get you to strike it like a muskie and reveal your true racist nature .
I know some Kenyans that aren't Obama (even though you're right that he's of Kenyan descent).
Don't you in your diversified culture there in CO?
L-O-L! Wow....Nice dodge.
That's been known to happen when inconvenient to compare the historical track record of presidents and presidential candidates to what a presidential elect might do.
Alrighty then if you REALLY want to stay on topic:
Can you post the proof of Russian hacking of the election in favor of Donald Trump?
he already told you he lied to you to rile you up for your vote and you fell for it. dumbass.He has 4 years to prove he meant those statements, or not.
obama's approval rating is 60% and will only go up once he leaves office.the historical track record of presidents
that's been done already. declassified report dropped. 17 intelligence agencies are in agreement, along with every member of congress, and even trum himself.Can you post the proof of Russian hacking of the election in favor of Donald Trump?
Disinvaginious answer.Redickulous question.
Unless you can post proof that they didn't?
What did I dodge? I asked you to clarify what you wanted to talk about. Now you ask a rhetorical question. This isn't going well.
I was saying of course I don't personally have proof to the Russian hacking, which is the answer we both knew to the question you asked me.Disinvaginious answer.
It's what the entire thread is about. Are you saying you don't understand that?
Do you often comment on rhetorical questions because, by your definition, that what every one of your posts has been.
But congratulations, you got Buckold and Babaloo into a reach around tizzy.
Oh....like when they said Iraq had WMD's.<snip>
I think it's true because I choose to believe all the intellegence agencies saying that it's true.
<snip>
Misdirection. You're still not talking about trump. Try again.Oh....like when they said Iraq had WMD's.
Good track record there.
wow, parroting trump nearly verbatim. that's spectacularly pathetic.Oh....like when they said Iraq had WMD's.
Good track record there.
no you didn't, you literally just repeated a trump lie verbatim.No....you said intelligence agencies.
I proved how they can be false with historical fact.