Trump admits Russia was behind election hacking

Bear420

Well-Known Member
“Although in our country the Chief Magistrate must almost of necessity be chosen by a party and stand pledged to its principles and measures, yet in his official action he should not be the President of a part only, but of the whole people of the United States. While he executes the laws with an impartial hand, shrinks from no proper responsibility, and faithfully carries out in the executive department of the government the principles and policy of those who have chosen him, he should not be unmindful that our fellow-citizens who have differed with him in opinion are entitled to the full and free exercise of their opinions and judgments, and that the rights of all are entitled to respect and regard.” – James K. Polk
 

choomer

Well-Known Member
You lost me with nib and babaloo. So Hodor seemed to be the only thing to say.
That part wasn't for you but for the Blue Cuck Crew.
It was in the 1st post of our exchange that you replied to, and you didn't have a problem then, so I assumed you could negotiate it this time too.
You quoted it too! Have a look.

Is that the same kind of "assumptive nature" that leads you to believe trump is going to be good for America?
Now that we've negated that little canard, you have nothing to say about the rest of the post?
Does it start becoming inconvenient? :(
 

HAF2

Well-Known Member
That part wasn't for you but for the Blue Cuck Crew.
It was in the 1st post of our exchange that you replied to, and you didn't have a problem then, so I assumed you could negotiate it this time too.
You quoted it too! Have a look.



Now that we've negated that little canard, you have nothing to say about the rest of the post?
Does it start becoming inconvenient? :(
It's hard for me to hear what you're saying over how loud you are patting yourself on the back.
What is it you want to talk about? I was trying to talk about trump. Then other people kept bringing up Hilary and Obama (like you did a couple times).
Do you have a question for me on what I feel about trump and his actions thus far? Type more clearly I'm having a hard time understanding what you are trying to say.
 

choomer

Well-Known Member
It's hard for me to hear what you're saying over how loud you are patting yourself on the back.
What is it you want to talk about? I was trying to talk about trump. Then other people kept bringing up Hilary and Obama (like you did a couple times).
Do you have a question for me on what I feel about trump and his actions thus far? Type more clearly I'm having a hard time understanding what you are trying to say.
Nice dodge. ;)
That's been known to happen when inconvenient to compare the historical track record of presidents and presidential candidates to what a presidential elect might do.

Alrighty then if you REALLY want to stay on topic:

Can you post the proof of Russian hacking of the election in favor of Donald Trump?
 

HAF2

Well-Known Member
Nice dodge. ;)
That's been known to happen when inconvenient to compare the historical track record of presidents and presidential candidates to what a presidential elect might do.

Alrighty then if you REALLY want to stay on topic:

Can you post the proof of Russian hacking the election in favor of Donald Trump?
Redickulous question.
Unless you can post proof that they didn't?

What did I dodge? I asked you to clarify what you wanted to talk about. Now you ask a rhetorical question. This isn't going well.
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
'Bout fuggin time you posted that Buckold. It's only taken months of your empty accusations for you to prove they have no basis in fact.
Did it take this long for you to get Babaloo and Crustin to stop twiddling your nib so you could hunt that up?

Thanks for posting proof of your assumptive nature as I don't see anywhere in that quoted sentence that I type "Obama", but it does demonstrate how easy it is w/ just a little bait to get you to strike it like a muskie and reveal your true racist nature . :D

I know some Kenyans that aren't Obama (even though you're right that he's of Kenyan descent).
Don't you in your diversified culture there in CO?
that's your other go-to. pretend you were talking about some other gay kenyan muslim who is responsible for united states policies at the executive level.

your main go-to is to deny that i keep posting the proof of what a racist conspiracy theorist you are.
 

Big_Lou

Well-Known Member
Nice dodge. ;)
That's been known to happen when inconvenient to compare the historical track record of presidents and presidential candidates to what a presidential elect might do.

Alrighty then if you REALLY want to stay on topic:

Can you post the proof of Russian hacking of the election in favor of Donald Trump?
L-O-L! Wow....

At this point this depraved fucker is LOST in the cuck.....Drumpf's 3-incher is COATED in choom shit.
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
the historical track record of presidents
obama's approval rating is 60% and will only go up once he leaves office.

trum is at 37% right now. this is usually the highest point of a president's approval rating. sad.

Can you post the proof of Russian hacking of the election in favor of Donald Trump?
that's been done already. declassified report dropped. 17 intelligence agencies are in agreement, along with every member of congress, and even trum himself.

but you will just deny it the same way you deny the fact that you are a racist conspiracy theorist who thinks obama is secretly a gay kenyan muslim.

shitbag.
 

choomer

Well-Known Member
Redickulous question.
Unless you can post proof that they didn't?

What did I dodge? I asked you to clarify what you wanted to talk about. Now you ask a rhetorical question. This isn't going well.
Disinvaginious answer.

It's what the entire thread is about. Are you saying you don't understand that?
Do you often comment on rhetorical questions because, by your definition, that what every one of your posts has been.

But congratulations, you got Buckold and Babaloo into a reach around tizzy. ;)
 

HAF2

Well-Known Member
Disinvaginious answer.

It's what the entire thread is about. Are you saying you don't understand that?
Do you often comment on rhetorical questions because, by your definition, that what every one of your posts has been.

But congratulations, you got Buckold and Babaloo into a reach around tizzy. ;)
I was saying of course I don't personally have proof to the Russian hacking, which is the answer we both knew to the question you asked me.
I think it's true because I choose to believe all the intellegence agencies saying that it's true.

To clarify:
rhe·tor·i·cal ques·tion
noun
  1. a question asked in order to create a dramatic effect or to make a point rather than to get an answer.
    "the presentation was characterized by impossibly long sentences and a succession of rhetorical questions"
Did you actually think I had proof of the Russian hacking? No, therefore you asked a rhetorical question.
Take notes there will be a quiz later.
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
Oh....like when they said Iraq had WMD's.

Good track record there.
wow, parroting trump nearly verbatim. that's spectacularly pathetic.

but then again, you were just parroting him with the whole "obama is a secret gay kenyan" thing too, so you are not known for your originality.

and our intelligence communities never said iraq had WMDs. that case was manufactured by the bush administration based on false intelligence. google "the 16 words", you racist pile of garbage.
 

choomer

Well-Known Member
No....you said intelligence agencies.
I proved how they can be false with historical fact of something it took years to prove and cost trillions.

If you want to talk Trump without talking about the ancillary parts that gave reason to this thread, wouldn't it be better to create a "I wanna talk about Trump" thread?
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
No....you said intelligence agencies.
I proved how they can be false with historical fact.
no you didn't, you literally just repeated a trump lie verbatim.

the intelligence agencies never said iraq had WMDs. that was manufactured by the bush administration from innuendo and false, debunked reports.

you dumb nazi bitch.
 
Top