Study: Hillary Clinton’s TV ads were almost entirely policy-free

ttystikk

Well-Known Member
Your Democratic "leadership"

This is what stands in the way of a 2020 Trump reelection... Let that sink in for a minute...




Jake Tapper: "I want to ask you, president Trump at CPAC on Friday said the Republican party, from now on, will be the party of the American worker and in November, president Trump carried white voters without a college degree, working class voters, by a staggering 37 percentage points. What is your plan to win these voters back into the Democratic fold?"

Tom Perez: "We lead with our values and we lead with our actions. We talk to them about how literally hours into the Trump administration, he was a fraud. He made it harder for first-time homeowners to buy a home. He made it harder to save for retirement. He nominated a judge for the Supreme Court who wants to eviscerate collective bargaining. If you want good jobs, elect a Democrat. That's the message that we have to communicate, it's a message that is true, it resonates in every zip code and that's what you're going to be doing all over the nation. The fact is that the Democrats grow the middle-class, Democrats protect economic security and we need to do a better job of communicating that message everywhere."

Tapper: "I know you're probably reluctant to criticize Hillary Clinton, but are you of the opinion that her campaign did not talk about those economic values sufficiently, instead focusing on the perceived character flaws of the current president?"

Perez: "Well certainly we have to do a better job as a Democratic party of messaging what we stand for, we have to make sure that we're out there every week talking about how we're the party of middle-class security, we're the party of inclusion, we believe diversity is our greatest strength. Because when we lead with these values, I believe that's when we succeed. Because those are the values of the American people. That's why you see millions of people out there marching in the aftermath of January 20th, saying "Donald Trump, you don't stand for our values". That's why you see for instance, yesterday, in Delaware, there was a big election for a state senate seat and it was the seat that held the state senate in balance, and it was a great example of that activism we've seen, Jake, coming into fruition. Our Revolution, the DNC, grassroots activists came in to help elect Stephanie Hanson by a whopping 16%. This is the definition of the DNC and the Democratic party. Coming together to make sure we help elect candidates from the state house to the senate to the school board, and I am so excited about what happened there yesterday in Delaware. We've got opportunities right here in Atlanta where I sit today, Congressional 6th which is Cobb county, uhh, we're gonna take the fight there and people ask me all the time, Jake, "How do you translate the energy out there, Tom, into action and results?" we did exactly that in Delaware yesterday and we're gonna work like heck to do that here in Georgia and elsewhere. It's very exciting to see the energy!"



If and only if he repudiates campaign finance will I believe a word he says.
 

Padawanbater2

Well-Known Member
TYT, Cenk Uygur proposed it on MSNBC. They discussed everything but campaign finance reform, in my mind the root of the current evil afflicting our political system.

We can play whack a mole with symptoms or we can cut out the heart of the problem. The Justice Democrats would have us play whack a mole circle jerk games forever.
Watch some of these clips from the TYT channel, Cenk has been a very vocal advocate for campaign finance reform for a long time;

https://www.youtube.com/user/TheYoungTurks/search?query=campaign+finance+reform

Same thing with Kyle Kulinski from Secular Talk, the cofounder of Justice Democrats;

https://www.youtube.com/user/SecularTalk/search?query=campaign+finance+reform

Campaign finance reform is one of the key policy positions on the platform
 

ttystikk

Well-Known Member
Watch some of these clips from the TYT channel, Cenk has been a very vocal advocate for campaign finance reform for a long time;

https://www.youtube.com/user/TheYoungTurks/search?query=campaign+finance+reform

Same thing with Kyle Kulinski from Secular Talk, the cofounder of Justice Democrats;

https://www.youtube.com/user/SecularTalk/search?query=campaign+finance+reform

Campaign finance reform is one of the key policy positions on the platform
I hope you're right. I have my doubts because he's on MSNBC, another corporation all too happy to spend millions to buy candidates.
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
the fact that padaraper is STILL trying to bash clinton while the trump regime is fucking everyone it can up the ass is proof of how insecure he is about women.
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
Clinton was and is a Republican in Dems clothing.

She's a fraud. That's why she lost.

Even at that, I still voted for her because a fraud is better than a megalomaniacal liar.
she's a "third way" democrat. she would have appointed liberal judges and favored liberal social policies. nothing fraudulent about that.
 

Padawanbater2

Well-Known Member
I hope you're right. I have my doubts because he's on MSNBC, another corporation all too happy to spend millions to buy candidates.
He used to be a host on MSNBC until management tried to gag him. He left MSNBC and has not quit talking shit about them being shills for the Democratic establishment - no different than Fox News is for the Republican establishment - since. I've seen enough from both founders over the years to publicly stamp my own guarantee of legitimacy to the organization. If campaign finance reform was not the number one issue for both of them, I would be shocked. Check out some of Kyle's recent clips, he tears the establishment to absolute shreds over their conduct during the primary.
STILL trying to bash clinton
I'm making a legitimate criticism of the Democratic establishment. I doubt you have any actual responses to my question about what the current Democratic party you support actually values, your presence on this forum personifies that criticism as, like the Democratic establishment, you lack all value.
 

Padawanbater2

Well-Known Member
she's a "third way" democrat. she would have appointed liberal judges and favored liberal social policies. nothing fraudulent about that.
She's not a fraud because she might have appointed a liberal to the Supreme Court, she's a fraud because she accepts corporate bribes to do their bidding in favor of the American people she is elected to represent.

Stack up the strawmen, watch me knock them down
 

ttystikk

Well-Known Member
she's a "third way" democrat. she would have appointed liberal judges and favored liberal social policies. nothing fraudulent about that.
She was all for whatever her corporate owners told her. She lost because no one believed her pivot towards Bernie's positions.

Her idea of a 'third way' was and remains to follow the Republican playbook, right down to sucking corporate cock for campaign cash.
 

ttystikk

Well-Known Member
He used to be a host on MSNBC until management tried to gag him. He left MSNBC and has not quit talking shit about them being shills for the Democratic establishment - no different than Fox News is for the Republican establishment - since. I've seen enough from both founders over the years to publicly stamp my own guarantee of legitimacy to the organization. If campaign finance reform was not the number one issue for both of them, I would be shocked. Check out some of Kyle's recent clips, he tears the establishment to absolute shreds over their conduct during the primary.

I'm making a legitimate criticism of the Democratic establishment. I doubt you have any actual responses to my question about what the current Democratic party you support actually values, your presence on this forum personifies that criticism as, like the Democratic establishment, you lack all value.
I'm going to try to get a show on a local public access radio station. Time to start shouting from the rooftops!
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
I doubt you have any actual responses to my question about what the current Democratic party you support actually values
*raising minimum wage
*ensuring women have access to healthcare, birth control, legal abortion
*common sense gun control, universal background checks
*maintaining wall street reform
*rebuilding infrastructure
*making access to health care and insurance easier for more
*codifying civil rights for LGBTQ people
*sane, steady foreign policy
*creating millions of jobs in renewable energy, retraining workers
*better access to higher education, student loan reform
*a pathway to citizenship for undocumented workers
*continued funding for climate science research
*continued, steady lowering of the deficit until a surplus is achieved
*continuing the hands off approach to cannabis decisions by states
*getting lead out of people's water
*education, prevention, and mitigation of the ZIKA virus
*not being retarded, like you are, about the inevitability of globalization
*actually speaking out against anti-semitism and xenophobia
*a push towards paid maternal and paternal leave
*education reform policies that are actually effective
*greater access to child care for working parents

i could keep going but you really aren't worth it. you're not even worth this much. unless i list "stop the unfair persecution of men and let us have sexual choice!" you won't even care anyway.
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
She was all for whatever her corporate owners told her. She lost because no one believed her pivot towards Bernie's positions.

Her idea of a 'third way' was and remains to follow the Republican playbook, right down to sucking corporate cock for campaign cash.
well thank god we didn't elect the corporate campaign cash cock sucker. now schizophrenic people can buy guns and goldman sachs is in charge of the treasury, just as pada would have wanted.
 

ttystikk

Well-Known Member
well thank god we didn't elect the corporate campaign cash cock sucker. now schizophrenic people can buy guns and goldman sachs is in charge of the treasury, just as pada would have wanted.
Don't blame me, I swallowed my Bernie pride and gave her my vote.
 

ttystikk

Well-Known Member
*raising minimum wage
*ensuring women have access to healthcare, birth control, legal abortion
*common sense gun control, universal background checks
*maintaining wall street reform
*rebuilding infrastructure
*making access to health care and insurance easier for more
*codifying civil rights for LGBTQ people
*sane, steady foreign policy
*creating millions of jobs in renewable energy, retraining workers
*better access to higher education, student loan reform
*a pathway to citizenship for undocumented workers
*continued funding for climate science research
*continued, steady lowering of the deficit until a surplus is achieved
*continuing the hands off approach to cannabis decisions by states
*getting lead out of people's water
*education, prevention, and mitigation of the ZIKA virus
*not being retarded, like you are, about the inevitability of globalization
*actually speaking out against anti-semitism and xenophobia
*a push towards paid maternal and paternal leave
*education reform policies that are actually effective
*greater access to child care for working parents

i could keep going but you really aren't worth it. you're not even worth this much. unless i list "stop the unfair persecution of men and let us have sexual choice!" you won't even care anyway.
The only item on this list I believe is the continued support of State.

To Wall Street; ''stop it!' LULZ
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
The only item on this list I believe is the continued support of State.
so you don't think that those issues are what democrats in congress, governor's chairs, state legislatures, and the like are fighting for?

are you literally blind?
 
Top