nogod_
Well-Known Member
Agreed, i never suggested running those chips in parralel on that driver, only the cc/cv driver he linked initially before he edited his post.
As to the other bit, there have been a few threads addressing the voltage limitations of various cob holders re: high voltage strings, and your point has never been raised to my knowledge (full disclosure: i am not an electrician nor an electrical engineer in any way). So you're saying the voltage passing through the holders is only 36v and we would have to stick a 160v cob in there to go over spec? Does that mean we can wire as many quantum boards as we want in series and the guys selling them have been lying to their customers?
As to the other bit, there have been a few threads addressing the voltage limitations of various cob holders re: high voltage strings, and your point has never been raised to my knowledge (full disclosure: i am not an electrician nor an electrical engineer in any way). So you're saying the voltage passing through the holders is only 36v and we would have to stick a 160v cob in there to go over spec? Does that mean we can wire as many quantum boards as we want in series and the guys selling them have been lying to their customers?
The HLG-240H-C1400 is a constant current driver with minimum output voltage of 89V, which means in a parallel circuit each chip would be under 89V of tension at least, way above the optimal voltage for running them. If you put them on series they will be supplied with about 36V and 1.4A current on each chip, which means that each holder will be subject to this exact tension. The only object in this circuit which will be subject to the 179V tension will be the driver. You have to think of this circuit as a river, each chip is a 36V waterfall, and the driver is a pump raising the water all the way back to 179V lake. Between each chip with the same exact electrical properties (i.e resistance) the fall will be always 36V steep, the only point that connects to the extremes is the driver.