Do Designated Growers Need To Be ACMPR Patients

I've been on vacation and just got back to this thread. What a fucking shit show. Are there no mods here?

Hippy and GB (maybe the same person?) make this board unbearable. I can't even understand what they're saying half the time. I asked a simple question and it turned into a 3 pages of Hippy and GB doing whatever it is they're doing here. These are the exact trolls that I didn't want advice from, neither should anyone else tbh.

Thanks to those who tried to give a legitimate reply.
 
*chuckle*

If you think people havent recieved drug charges while being a certified designated grower you need to follow the news more.

Your response is one of the few helpful ones to go along with 2 pages of garbage. Get it?


Is it always the DG who gets charged if theres an offense with the patient's DG grow? I would assume it would be, since the patient may, (having a criminal record) not be able to see his Designated grow. The DG can just grow and keep whatever he wants unbeknownst to the patient. I know there are many DG licenses where the patient thinks the grow has been shut down, yet the DG is still growing, way over their count and keeping everything.
What is the mechanism to shut down an old DG grow anyways? The cops can't get a warrant to check, the license is still covered by the injunction?
 
What is the mechanism to shut down an old DG grow anyways? The cops can't get a warrant to check, the license is still covered by the injunction?
What I was told by Health Canada that you send them a registered letter firing your DG and send them your pinks and the copy of the DG's pinks. but this also shuts down your personal possession lic. so then you have to reapply all over again total crap but that is how they do things in Ottawa me I will never give up my pinks.
 
Read what? Your comment saying nobody likes me here?
I know...you won't get this either. ...not that I care.
med_fairly-honest-bills.jpg
 
Is it always the DG who gets charged if theres an offense with the patient's DG grow? I would assume it would be, since the patient may, (having a criminal record) not be able to see his Designated grow. The DG can just grow and keep whatever he wants unbeknownst to the patient. I know there are many DG licenses where the patient thinks the grow has been shut down, yet the DG is still growing, way over their count and keeping everything.
What is the mechanism to shut down an old DG grow anyways? The cops can't get a warrant to check, the license is still covered by the injunction?
I don't know about the old mmar dgs, but the acmpr looks pretty clear - file an amendment changing the dg/ switching to personal production, or cancelling the grow altogether. HC is to notify the former dg. This is under part 2, 180(3) of the acmpr regulations.
 
the comments that comment about your trolling out of no where..
grow up .
let it go
move on
take TM with you ...
cheers big ears!(:

I'm the troll? I asked a fucking question. Good god man, look in the mirror.
 
Back
Top