nevergoodenuf
Well-Known Member
PAR is 15 3 feet from light and 250 at the defuser, still cloady.
in this video here they are using solar to run the whole grow , its a long vid...but the solar grow is the first set up.If you just use solar panels on the roof to power artificial lights, maybe that sort of kind of counts?
You don't preserve the spectrum but it could be seen as the same energy, redirected.
I knew it was some ridiculous price.$3K per tube though.....
$3K per tube though.....
Can you guys say, quantity discount?I knew it was some ridiculous price.
10 percent off for a dozen? $27,000? What a bahgin! Just ordered!Can you guys say, quantity discount?
The big tubes they were using would easily replace at least one DE, if not several.
I knew this was only a matter of time, I remember pondering the concept of a "solar shingle" a decade ago when scientist were talking about carbon nano-tubes being a perfect material for such an application. I didnt think anyone could do it with current solar tech. Leave it to Tesla I guess. Figured at least 20 years away.In a perfect world.....
Bullshit. Canon (better known for cameras) did it over 20 years ago.I knew this was only a matter of time, I remember pondering the concept of a "solar shingle" a decade ago when scientist were talking about carbon nano-tubes being a perfect material for such an application. I didnt think anyone could do it with current solar tech. Leave it to Tesla I guess. Figured at least 20 years away.
Having thought about this for a few days, I can see the potential for using the tech to develop a hybrid greenhouse approach, with most of the benefits for both free natural lighting and full control of an indoor environment. Although I haven't seen it mentioned, there's a way to shut the light tube down so no light passes through it, isn't there? Gotta have that for photoperiod sensitive plants...
This picture to me is a bit strange.
I thought the technology had been around for awhile to.Bullshit. Canon (better known for cameras) did it over 20 years ago.
The technological underpinnings are no doubt better now, but the idea is definitely not new.
My guess is that it was not as durable as was originally hoped, and I'm sure it was very expensive. These might have been enough to keep it from being cost effective.I thought the technology had been around for awhile to.
Pretty sure i saw solar tiles that "plug" into each other many years ago.
They make bigger ones that do work.That thing is not worth a shit for growing plants,it´s just like a small window or skylight.
Rilla.
They are really easy to install. Seriously easy.Those solar tube skylights are awesome, it really gives the light an ethereal quality. They are not THAT expensive if you can do the labour yourself.
The technology has advanced quite a bit, nowadays they can even help with dehumidifying, can do 45 degree angles and can be quite long tubes,
IF you look at the website there is a dimmer option.Having thought about this for a few days, I can see the potential for using the tech to develop a hybrid greenhouse approach, with most of the benefits for both free natural lighting and full control of an indoor environment. Although I haven't seen it mentioned, there's a way to shut the light tube down so no light passes through it, isn't there? Gotta have that for photoperiod sensitive plants...
You can adjust the height look at the video.This picture to me is a bit strange.
Thats sunlight not a CFL...that should be at the top of the tent. As it is its just wasting headroom.