Men's Rights (cough)

[abandonconflict]

So, do you guys have any substantive issue with the mens rights movement or are you going to just keep patting yourself on the back for not being a misogynist? Is this what white knighting looks like on a site that has no women?

Does this thread bother you?

 

[abandonconflict]

You are the one that 'sucks'.

Not as much as your come back. Dude, I could eat a bowl of alphabet soup and shit out a better insult than that. What are you 6?

 

[st0wandgrow]

I had no idea about the gender of your retard children until you told me just now. You're even dumber than your retard daughter. You could probably find a critical thinking night school class somewhere in your area. You would benefit greatly from it.

Real classy sammich. Been here for 8 months and you think you own the place.

 

[dagwood45431]

Yeah, Bugeye has issues with equal rights. As far as I can tell, he's all about protecting privilege.

Privilege he somehow hasn't been able to parlay into any kind of success. I'd be bitter too.

 

[dagwood45431]

Real classy sammich. Been here for 8 months and you think you own the place.

Yeah, what of it? I'm going to redecorate your profile shortly. I'll get to it after I'm done with everyone else's.

Now then, you chimed in because you're triggered by my negative take on "men's rights" groups, yes? If so, let's delve into that. No need for all this tawdry passive-aggressiveness.

 

[Fogdog]

Privilege he somehow hasn't been able to parlay into any kind of success. I'd be bitter too.

Those are the most bitter. I don't think Bugeye fits the loser category. Most likely he fits the Trump voter profile white, male with median income of $65,000/yr.

These are the crybabies who strive to protect the privileged status of men's rights.

 

[dagwood45431]

Those are the most bitter. I don't think Bugeye fits the loser category. Most likely he fits the Trump voter profile white, male with median income of $65,000/yr.

These are the crybabies who strive to protect the privileged status of men's rights.

They should each be sent a participation trophy. That might simmer them down for a bit. Of course, half of them will either break some teeth or gape their asses thinking they've been awarded a sex toy.

 

[ANC]

 

[dagwood45431]

Sir, I am not sure whether to be insulted or aroused.

 

[choomer]

Because she's a nutbag much like you.

It doesn't get more feminist than a woman, Daggy, I'd say being one would have a much better insight into feminist issues than the icy curb slush of a snowflake that you are.

Are you a woman?
(Surgical re-assignment doesn't count until it comes w/ the ability to procreate with said surgical manipulation.)

Sir, I am not sure whether to be insulted or aroused.

I'm betting aroused.
You like the whiskers.

 

[dagwood45431]

Now that @st0wandgrow has chimed in, it must be asked: why are so many Bernbots misogynists? It's a serious question. The follow up question is: to what degree does that inform their opinion of HRC? I am not trolling here. I am seriously fascinated by this strange correlation that has emerged.

 

[st0wandgrow]

Yeah, what of it? I'm going to redecorate your profile shortly. I'll get to it after I'm done with everyone else's.

Now then, you chimed in because you're triggered by my negative take on "men's rights" groups, yes? If so, let's delve into that. No need for all this tawdry passive-aggressiveness.

"Men's rights" isn't a topic that interests me. It's kind of an absurd topic actually. I chimed in because you're being a cocky douche bag.

 

[dagwood45431]

It doesn't get more feminist than a woman

Objectively false. Look up Phyllis Schlafly some day, you uneducated kook. Every segment of society imaginable has self-loathing members. This phenomenon is very well known and understood (by the non-ignorant, anyway).

Choomer. I just want you to know: if a thought pops up in your head -- literally any kind of thought -- it's completely misguided and wrong and probably toxic. An "Opposite George" scenario (or "Opposite Georgette" as the case may be) would be your best move at this juncture. It's probably your last chance for at least a semblance of happiness. Please, help me help you. Take this lifeline I offer.

 

[dagwood45431]

"Men's rights" isn't a topic that interests me. It's kind of an absurd topic actually. I chimed in because you're being a cocky douche bag.

And you think I don't know you're completely full of shit and lying (or delusional) about this?

I can't force you to own your misogyny. No one can. Look for patterns in your thoughts and responses from others in your life, though. It's possible you're a closet misogynist and that particular reality for you really hasn't come fully into focus yet. Most people sleep walk through biases and prejudices. The truth often bleeds through, however, as it has here, with you.

I'm not perfect. I catch myself sometimes on various illogical biases and when I do, I examine them. Sometimes to no end, others to some kind of better understanding. There is still one I'm aware of that I'm in the early WTF stage with. I will not share what that is.

I can be a cocky douchebag, though. Usually when I'm trying to get under someone's skin. I am not all that. I'm barely a little of this and I damn sure don't have much of the other. I can piss a mug off though. That is one skill I certainly do have. I believe this fact speaks for itself right here in this very thread. Wouldn't you agree?

 

[Bugeye]

Yeah, Bugeye has issues with equal rights. As far as I can tell, he's all about protecting privilege.

Said no one that knows me, ever. But by all means, please make opposition to "men's rights" a crusade so I can keep laughing at you and dagwood. My guess is these men's rights guys are just the 0.0001% of the population that hasn't gotten laid by age 40. Another made up statistic you can fact check.

 

[dagwood45431]

Said no one that knows me, ever. But by all means, please make opposition to "men's rights" a crusade so I can keep laughing at you and dagwood. My guess is these men's rights guys are just the 0.0001% of the population that hasn't gotten laid by age 40. Another made up statistic you can fact check.

Your defensiveness here speaks louder than your words, Bugeye. You wasted a hell of a lot of time on a topic you forcefully proclaimed (twice now) to care nothing about.

Here's a quote both you and st0wandgrow might want to ponder:

The unexamined life is not worth living. -- Plato (although the origin is disputed)

 

[Observe & Report]

Thanks showing us how this movement employs the fake use of statistics. Your inference is that this "proves" bias. This kind of fake pseudo statistical proof is exactly why the "men's rights movement" should be viewed as another effort to suppress a marginalized group.

Maybe there are very good reasons why custody cases that go to trial usually result in the mother getting custody instead of 50/50 or some other outcome, or whatever it is. I don't know. However, is the logic of your counter argument sound? Just because most cases are settled in the mothers favor doesn't mean that MRAs don't have a point about the remainder or about some other issue entirely.

Imagine you were innocently hanging out at a friends house when he was busted by the DEA and you were hauled into court as an accomplice to a major trafficking case. Would you accept an unfair trial, biased jurors, improper evidence, no presumption of innocence, etc... just because more than 95% of all federal criminal defendants plead guilty?

 

[st0wandgrow]

And you think I don't know you're completely full of shit and lying (or delusional) about this?

I can't force you to own your misogyny. No one can. Look for patterns in your thoughts and responses from others in your life, though. It's possible you're a closet misogynist and that particular reality for you really hasn't come fully into focus yet. Most people sleep walk through biases and prejudices. The truth often bleeds through, however, as it has here, with you.

I'm not perfect. I catch myself sometimes on various illogical biases and when I do, I examine them. Sometimes to no end, others to some kind of better understanding. There is still one I'm aware of that I'm in the early WTF stage with. I will not share what that is.

I can be a cocky douchebag, though. Usually when I'm trying to get under someone's skin. I am not all that. I'm barely a little of this and I damn sure don't have much of the other. I can piss a mug off though. That is one skill I certainly do have. I believe this fact speaks for itself right here in this very thread.

Your amateur diagnosis is of little interest to me, sammich. My pink-pussy-hat wearing wife and daughters would get a good chuckle out of it though. I don't like Hillary for various reasons, but none of them have to do with her having a vagina. I really like Tulsi Gabbard and Kamala Harris though, but again, nothing to do with their genitalia.

While we're on the topic of amateur diagnosis'...

I get the impression that you seek attention, and RIU fills that void for you. Your dramatic posts about who you're putting on ignore, and making public your ignore list reeks of attention-seeking. Same with all of the ball handling you do with buckles and foggy (Larry Bird would be proud). Maybe a dating website would help you feel better about yourself? Just a thought.

Also, why do you not spell out the word fuck? I've noticed that you usually do the whole "fck" thing or some variation of that. Why is that? I'm assuming you're at least 18 and not worried about your mom finding out. Is this along the same lines as the religious freaks that won't spell out the word god? I'm giving you the benefit of the doubt here that you're not some giant pansy, and that there is some logical explanation for this. Genuinely curious....

 

[Bugeye]

Your defensiveness here speaks louder than your words, Bugeye. You wasted a hell of a lot of time on a topic you forcefully proclaimed (twice now) to care nothing about.

Here's a quote both you and st0wandgrow might want to ponder:

The unexamined life is not worth living. -- Plato (although the origin is disputed)

Calm down Francis. I'm on a wake and bake mission of mischief aimed at self entertainment. 100% success.

 

[dagwood45431]

Maybe there are very good reasons why custody cases that go to trial usually result in the mother getting custody instead of 50/50 or some other outcome, or whatever it is. I don't know. However, is the logic of your counter argument sound? Just because most cases are settled in the mothers favor doesn't mean that MRAs don't have a point about the remainder or about some other issue entirely.

Imagine you were innocently hanging out at a friends house when he was busted by the DEA and you were hauled into court as an accomplice to a major trafficking case. Would you accept an unfair trial, biased jurors, improper evidence, no presumption of innocence, etc... just because more than 95% of all federal criminal defendants plead guilty?

Hundreds of thousands of black and brown men locked up for no good reason and you're burning even a single brain cell worrying about the very phony problem of men's rights being trampled on in a historically (and still, to a large degree) patriarchal society? Again, you people make me sick.