If everyone at the concert was armed this wouldnt of happened

twostrokenut

Well-Known Member
Nope, still same argument you just can't face that you are wrong. That's because you are a cowardly piece of shit. You know it's true.
you still on the big switch too? let's see where were you, ah yes the popular presidential vote....to which the black vote went from Republican to Democrat in the 30's with fdr....not in 64 as you suggest.

i didn't even have to call you a "dumbfuck piece of shit" to cite that fact either, imagine that.
 

twostrokenut

Well-Known Member
Nope. It is you that has swallowed the Russian propaganda hook, line, and sinker.

Does anyone "need" a billion dollars? What do you think? Do you think massive wealth inequality is desirable? Sustainable? How is it we have billionaires with no capital? Are you saying the extreme logical conclusions of unfettered capitalism we are seeing aren't truly capitalist enough for you? Are you unintelligable or just stupid trying to be cryptic to seem smart?

I've never argued complete socialism. Who is arguing that? That's your straw man, dumbfuck.
is your contention that economic socialism isn't "complete socialism"? that's pretty rediculous if so.

I put you in fogdog camp of take "the wealth" and disperse it all social justice like.....was I wrong? apologies if so, and I didn't have to call you a fuckwit piece of shit to convey that sentiment either.
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
and you worked for Netflix. no points as usual. Ben wears the jew hat all the time...how come in all your pictures you aren't wearing one?

im thinking because Ben is Jewish and you are just larping for troll points.
Ben Shapiro worked for the neo-nazi publication known as breitbart. He ain't jewish, otherwise you'd hate him.

Nazi.
 

twostrokenut

Well-Known Member
You will never take your Breitard hat off, and Putin has already conquered your feeble mind.
bezmenov was clear.....it may take two generations at most. this was executed well before putin so where does that scope your statements on the matter?
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
you still on the big switch too? let's see where were you, ah yes the popular presidential vote....to which the black vote went from Republican to Democrat in the 30's with fdr....not in 64 as you suggest.

i didn't even have to call you a "dumbfuck piece of shit" to cite that fact either, imagine that.
The south has republican reps and senators too now, revisionist nazi
 

PCXV

Well-Known Member
bezmenov was clear.....it may take two generations at most. this was executed well before putin so where does that scope your statements on the matter?
It obviously didn't work the way he said Russia wanted it to. Of course it could be said Russia adjusted its strategy after it disintegrated and lost the resources to effectively influence, adopting the strategy that is moreso weak and can only fool weak minds like yours.
 

PCXV

Well-Known Member
you still on the big switch too? let's see where were you, ah yes the popular presidential vote....to which the black vote went from Republican to Democrat in the 30's with fdr....not in 64 as you suggest.

i didn't even have to call you a "dumbfuck piece of shit" to cite that fact either, imagine that.
You are on the run, grasping at straws and straw men. Wonderful.

Yep, it took many decades and much political circumstance to get where we are today. Doesn't change my argument.

Fact: you are a dumbfuck piece of shit because you can't have an honest fair discussion. Possibly not your fault, you were just an easy pawn for the far-right.
 

Chezus

Well-Known Member
The ironic/pathetic fact is the NRA was all for gun control when they helped draft the Gun Control Act of 1968.

But they wrote it to help keep guns from blacks.
 

PCXV

Well-Known Member
Not the legislators? So Jeb Bush, Ted Cruz, Marco Rubio, Paul Ryan, Chris Christie, etc. are not social conservatives that embrace epithets against blacks, Mexicans, Muslims, liberals, progressives, civil rights protests, cities that are predominantly black etc.? You don't see them enacting voter ID laws in predominantly minority cities, gerrymandering along racial lines, mischaracterizing and demonizing black lives matter and anti-fascists, saying their KKK and neo-Nazi supporters are fine people while BLM protests are SOBs? The list goes on and on you willfully ignorant piece of shit. You are what is wrong with America.
Never got a reply to this @twostrokenut .

Can't argue this one?
 

PCXV

Well-Known Member
is your contention that economic socialism isn't "complete socialism"? that's pretty rediculous if so.

I put you in fogdog camp of take "the wealth" and disperse it all social justice like.....was I wrong? apologies if so, and I didn't have to call you a fuckwit piece of shit to convey that sentiment either.
Where have I advocated for complete socialism?

Common goods belong to the public. Everything else should remain in the free and fair markets.

Taking the wealth for the sake of taking it isn't the goal. Taxation should be smart and moral fiscal policy that aims to keep demand up and mitigate the suffering of inherent losers in a capitalist system. Third way.
 

twostrokenut

Well-Known Member
Did those legislators "switch sides" after the civil rights act?

then I'm afraid you can't add them to your grand total of 2/535 to support your revisionist narrative.
Never got a reply to this @twostrokenut .

Can't argue this one?
I did see? two pages back.

none of those legislators "switched" so you are shifting focus to your opinion of them. I have opinions of them too, not all good either.

but that wasnt the subject. you are a proponent of the big switch theory and that seems to be a large basis of your opinion overall.

Did you ever come up with more than 2 that switched?

If you come up with a majority "nay" that switched from the majority Democrat legislature in the 88th congress.....maybe even some pubs that went dem then I would just be like "yeah the big switch", that's valid.....i wouldn't even call you a "fuckwit piece of shit" for challenging my opinion.

but nothing so far but a theory with no evidence.
 
Last edited:

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
I did see? two pages back.

none of those legislators "switched" so you are shifting focus to your opinion of them. I have opinions of them too, not all good either.

but that wasnt the subject. you are a proponent of the big switch theory and that seems to be a large basis of your opinion overall.

Did you ever come up with more than 2 that switched?

If you come up with a majority that switched from the majority Democrat legislature in the 88th congress.....maybe even some pubs that went dem then I would just be like "yeah the big switch", that's valid.....i wouldn't even call you a "fuckwit piece of shit" for challenging my opinion.

but nothing so far but a theory with no evidence.
So there was no switch then?

Southern white conservatives still vote democrat?
 

PCXV

Well-Known Member
I did see? two pages back.

none of those legislators "switched" so you are shifting focus to your opinion of them. I have opinions of them too, not all good either.

but that wasnt the subject. you are a proponent of the big switch theory and that seems to be a large basis of your opinion overall.

Did you ever come up with more than 2 that switched?

If you come up with a majority "nay" that switched from the majority Democrat legislature in the 88th congress.....maybe even some pubs that went dem then I would just be like "yeah the big switch", that's valid.....i wouldn't even call you a "fuckwit piece of shit" for challenging my opinion.

but nothing so far but a theory with no evidence.
Try to confront the actual argument:

Not that literal legislators switched immediately, the demographics shifted which shifted the ideology via who the demographics voted for over time. The Republicans post 1980, including the ones I named, are much closer ideologically to the Democratic legislators pre-1980 than Democrats today. Democrats today are further left than Republicans pre-1970. Let's start there. Do you get it?
 
Last edited:

PCXV

Well-Known Member
Did those legislators "switch sides" after the civil rights act?

then I'm afraid you can't add them to your grand total of 2/535 to support your revisionist narrative.
This was your pathetic straw man response. Totally mischaracterizing my argument as if I was saying Republicans switched to Democrats just to pass the CRA. This is why you deserve the moniker 'dumbfuck'.
 

twostrokenut

Well-Known Member
So there was no switch then?

Southern white conservatives still vote democrat?
why yes, southern black conservatives still vote republican.

black southern vote switched to dem in the 30s with the new deal. white southern vote switched to pub in the 70s and 80s as racism declined and industry moved south.

that's history, and it doesn't fit your narrative.
 
Top