Will Congress act now?

Will the Congress enact more gun control?

  • Oh, yea, absolutely!

    Votes: 2 5.4%
  • Never fucking happen

    Votes: 35 94.6%

  • Total voters
    37

Grandpapy

Well-Known Member

schuylaar

Well-Known Member
Would a suppressor continue to function on a rapid fire rifle or would it make the rifle malfunction? Pretty high heat moving that many rounds, not sure if they are built for that.
many jammed- pad with numbers indicated, kept track of what was left..obvi.

does anyone really think if you have money, you cant be insane?

they keep referencing something happened October 2016. a lot DID. a man NOT political chose the MOST political way to deliver message.

moaning and crying out at night? that's a tough one. physical or emo pain which manifests physically? there is no mention other than he took valium. who gave him that and why?

shopping for venue? soon, now..but no true deadline, expiry or anniversary to coincide with since they were in different cities, different types of people grouped.
 
Last edited:

londonfog

Well-Known Member
many jammed- pad with numbers indicated, kept track of what was left..obvi.

does anyone really think if you have money, you cant be insane?

they keep referencing something happened October 2016. a lot DID. a man NOT political chose the MOST political way to deliver message.

moaning and crying out at night? that's a tough one. physical or emo pain which manifests physically? there is no mention other than he took valium. who gave him that and why?

shopping for venue? soon, now..but no true deadline, expiry or anniversary to coincide with since they were in different cities, different types of people grouped.
What are you trying to freaking say.???How many pills did you pop this morning? Shit got you speaking more weird than usual
 

PetFlora

Well-Known Member
So, what do you think, boy's and girls?

Do you think there will be a continuation in the House of Representatives to ignore the prevalence of gun violence and mass murders in the US, almost all caused by assault weapons with high capacity magazines, or continue to suck NRA dick, and a few million gun owners?

I say, nope, it ain't going to change a fucking thing.

Welcome
to Trumpworld

Ignore? lol Put this in perspective. For the most part, the weapons that were found were already illegal. Reread that trolls

and just how did they get up to the room with a shit ton of ammo, and what about gun flash from TWO other rooms

AND if he was 1/10 as skilled as the msm is reporting, a lot more people would have died

Now...

More people die in vehicle accidents or prescription medication
and many/most of the shootings are the result/effect of taking prescription medication
 

Rob Roy

Well-Known Member
ok, i'll keep asking since you're too pussy to answer.

Why did you think obama was literally going to ban guns though?

Do you at least acknowledge what an idiot you were in hindsight?

Or are you gonna double down on the racism?

too much of a pussy to answer these questions, nazi?

At a minimum, it is the goal of socialists like Obama and neocons like Hillary to turn a right to possess guns into a revocable privilege for peasants, since they both know an outright ban will be resisted... so they work the slippery slope and keep inching towards it. Would you deny that ?
 

Justin-case

Well-Known Member
At a minimum, it is the goal of socialists like Obama and neocons like Hillary to turn a right to possess guns into a revocable privilege for peasants, since they both know an outright ban will be resisted... so they work the slippery slope and keep inching towards it. Would you deny that ?
You and your clansmen are the only ones that wants to take people's civil rights away, pedophile.
 

Rob Roy

Well-Known Member
You and your clansmen are the only ones that wants to take people's civil rights away, pedophile.
Well, I'd agree with you if you were correct, but you see, you're not.

I think all people have the right to be free from forced human associations, don't you ?

Can you tell me who has the right to force another to person associate with them ?

Also, in your ridiculous perjorative, you should have said "Klansmen" , not "clansmen" , numb nuts.
 

tampee

Well-Known Member
So you're fascist. Got it, pedo
So only Communists are not fascist? Well since America is the most racially diverse and richest nation in the world fascism isn't too bad under your theory.

In China you can't do shit without permission from the government.
 

Justin-case

Well-Known Member
Well, I'd agree with you if you were correct, but you see, you're not.

I think all people have the right to be free from forced human associations, don't you ?

Can you tell me who has the right to force another to person associate with them ?

Also, in your ridiculous perjorative, you should have said "Klansmen" , not "clansmen" , numb nuts.

You would know, pedophile.
 

st0wandgrow

Well-Known Member
it is the goal of socialists like Obama...to turn a right to possess guns into a revocable privilege....so they work the slippery slope and keep inching towards it.
What did Obama do to “inch towards making guns a revocable privilege”? What gun rights were on the books prior to his 2 terms that are now absent?

It never fails to amaze me how gun rights advocates just pull shit out of their asses to play the victim. Common sense is in short supply
 

tampee

Well-Known Member
I'm pretty sure you can't beat me in a straight up debate. Abe ? Lincoln ? I have no respect for that racist fucker.
Was he really racist? I did hear some shit that he was only ending slavery in the South but allowing it to continue in the North. Didn't make much sense so I didn't bother researching it.
 

Rob Roy

Well-Known Member
What did Obama do to “inch towards making guns a revocable privilege”? What gun rights were on the books prior to his 2 terms that are now absent?

It never fails to amaze me how gun rights advocates just pull shit out of their asses to play the victim. Common sense is in short supply

Fair questions. Viewed another way, you could ask, what did he try to do, what did he want to do or what did he fail to undo ?

Obama, like Hillary wants to hold the gun and yes I'm waxing philosophic.


Common sense ? Hmm. common assumptions are often erroneous.

Guns ALREADY are revoked from felons aren't they? Except many felons were VICTIMS of men with guns, rather than actual criminals. What did Obama do, to undo that ?
 

st0wandgrow

Well-Known Member
Fair questions. Viewed another way, you could ask, what did he try to do, what did he want to do or what did he fail to undo ?

Obama, like Hillary wants to hold the gun and yes I'm waxing philosophic.


Common sense ? Hmm. common assumptions are often erroneous.

Guns ALREADY are revoked from felons aren't they? Except many felons were VICTIMS of men with guns, rather than actual criminals. What did Obama do, to undo that ?
Do you feel that everyone should have the right to own a gun, no exceptions?
 

Rob Roy

Well-Known Member
Was he really racist? I did hear some shit that he was only ending slavery in the South but allowing it to continue in the North. Didn't make much sense so I didn't bother researching it.






Lincoln didn’t believe blacks should have the same rights as whites.

Though Lincoln argued that the founding fathers’ phrase “All men are created equal” applied to blacks and whites alike, this did not mean he thought they should have the same social and political rights. His views became clear during an 1858 series of debates with his opponent in the Illinois race for U.S. Senate, Stephen Douglas, who had accused him of supporting “negro equality.” In their fourth debate, at Charleston, Illinois, on September 18, 1858, Lincoln made his position clear. “I will say then that I am not, nor ever have been, in favor of bringing about in any way the social and political equality of the white and black races,” he began, going on to say that he opposed blacks having the right to vote, to serve on juries, to hold office and to intermarry with whites. What he did believe was that, like all men, blacks had the right to improve their condition in society and to enjoy the fruits of their labor. In this way they were equal to white men, and for this reason slavery was inherently unjust.


Like his views on emancipation, Lincoln’s position on social and political equality for African-Americans would evolve over the course of his presidency. In the last speech of his life, delivered on April 11, 1865, he argued for limited black suffrage, saying that any black man who had served the Union during the Civil War should have the right to vote.



Lincoln thought colonization could resolve the issue of slavery.
For much of his career, Lincoln believed that colonization—or the idea that a majority of the African-American population should leave the United States and settle in Africa or Central America—was the best way to confront the problem of slavery. His two great political heroes, Henry Clay and Thomas Jefferson, had both favored colonization; both were slave owners who took issue with aspects of slavery but saw no way that blacks and whites could live together peaceably. Lincoln first publicly advocated for colonization in 1852, and in 1854 said that his first instinct would be “to free all the slaves, and send them to Liberia” (the African state founded by the American Colonization Society in 1821).

Nearly a decade later, even as he edited the draft of the preliminary Emancipation Proclamation in August of 1862, Lincoln hosted a delegation of freed slaves at the White House in the hopes of getting their support on a plan for colonization in Central America. Given the “differences” between the two races and the hostile attitudes of whites towards blacks, Lincoln argued, it would be “better for us both, therefore, to be separated.” Lincoln’s support of colonization provoked great anger among black leaders and abolitionists, who argued that African-Americans were as much natives of the country as whites, and thus deserved the same rights. After he issued the preliminary Emancipation Proclamation, Lincoln never again publicly mentioned colonization, and a mention of it in an earlier draft was deleted by the time the final proclamation was issued in January 1863.

Emancipation was a military policy.
As much as he hated the institution of slavery, Lincoln didn’t see the Civil War as a struggle to free the nation’s 4 million slaves from bondage. Emancipation, when it came, would have to be gradual, and the important thing to do was to prevent the Southern rebellion from severing the Union permanently in two. But as the Civil War entered its second summer in 1862, thousands of slaves had fled Southern plantations to Union lines, and the federal government didn’t have a clear policy on how to deal with them. Emancipation, Lincoln saw, would further undermine the Confederacy while providing the Union with a new source of manpower to crush the rebellion.

In July 1862 the president presented his draft of the preliminary Emancipation Proclamation to his cabinet. Secretary of State William Seward urged him to wait until things were going better for the Union on the field of battle, or emancipation might look like the last gasp of a nation on the brink of defeat. Lincoln agreed and returned to edit the draft over the summer. On September 17 the bloody Battle of Antietam gave Lincoln the opportunity he needed. He issued the preliminary proclamation to his cabinet on September 22, and it was published the following day. As a cheering crowd gathered at the White House, Lincoln addressed them from a balcony: “I can only trust in God I have made no mistake … It is now for the country and the world to pass judgment on it.”


Emancipation Proclamation Hero
The Emancipation Proclamation didn’t actually free all of the slaves.
Since Lincoln issued the Emancipation Proclamation as a military measure, it didn’t apply to border slave states like Delaware, Maryland, Kentucky and Missouri, all of which had remained loyal to the Union. Lincoln also exempted selected areas of the Confederacy that had already come under Union control in hopes of gaining the loyalty of whites in those states. In practice, then, the Emancipation Proclamation didn’t immediately free a single slave, as the only places it applied were places where the federal government had no control—the Southern states currently fighting against the Union.





Not sure if he was as big a racist as FDR though.
 

SneekyNinja

Well-Known Member
Fair questions. Viewed another way, you could ask, what did he try to do, what did he want to do or what did he fail to undo ?

Obama, like Hillary wants to hold the gun and yes I'm waxing philosophic.


Common sense ? Hmm. common assumptions are often erroneous.

Guns ALREADY are revoked from felons aren't they? Except many felons were VICTIMS of men with guns, rather than actual criminals. What did Obama do, to undo that ?
How long do you spend getting to know the 13 year olds before you suggest disgusting perverted things and ask them for consent?
 
Top