If everyone at the concert was armed this wouldnt of happened

londonfog

Well-Known Member
You avoided answering the question.

Who's decision is it? Who decides if someone is capable of giving consent?

If my 10 year old daughter feels that she is old enough to have sex, but I as her parent disagree, who has the final say? Or if she feels that she is old enough to drink, but I disagree, who makes the call?

Kids think they are capable of doing all sorts of shit that they really are not. As a society we have put age restrictions on certain things like drinking, driving, smoking, voting, etc. The age restrictions may seem arbitrary, but there is some sound thinking behind it like brain development, education, maturity, etc. Of course there are some kids that are more advanced than others, and not every child fits in to the same box, but in general the age of consent is a decent guidline that was arrived at not by accident. If you leave "consent" up to children that are not emotionally mature enough to engage in certain types of behaviour, there will be consequences for that child down the road. We have observed this in children over time, and therefor have put age restrictions on certain behavior. It's common sense.
keep thinking like this and there may be hope for you
 

Rob Roy

Well-Known Member
You avoided answering the question.

Who's decision is it? Who decides if someone is capable of giving consent?

If my 10 year old daughter feels that she is old enough to have sex, but I as her parent disagree, who has the final say? Or if she feels that she is old enough to drink, but I disagree, who makes the call?

Kids think they are capable of doing all sorts of shit that they really are not. As a society we have put age restrictions on certain things like drinking, driving, smoking, voting, etc. The age restrictions may seem arbitrary, but there is some sound thinking behind it like brain development, education, maturity, etc. Of course there are some kids that are more advanced than others, and not every child fits in to the same box, but in general the age of consent is a decent guidline that was arrived at not by accident. If you leave "consent" up to children that are not emotionally mature enough to engage in certain types of behaviour, there will be consequences for that child down the road. We have observed this in children over time, and therefor have put age restrictions on certain behavior. It's common sense.

I thought my answer was concise. I said you would make the decision.

Actually the problem with your example (above) goes back to my silly consent fairy example,which illustrates that the "age of consent" isn't in reality universal, nor is it even statutorily universal since it varies from plantation to plantation. (state to state)

As an aside, I appreciate your communicating in this discussion in a reasonable manner.

How do you feel about asking 17 year olds to join the military and kill people, but then telling them they aren't old enough to do X ?
 

Rob Roy

Well-Known Member
Poor Rob Roy. Oppressed by a society that wont allow him to fuck children.


Oh okay, I'll try to have a semi real conversation with you.


About how old were you when you reached the ability to consent ? Was it the exact same age as the statute said and could it be different for other people ?
 

Rob Roy

Well-Known Member
18.

Why do you advocate it being legal for adults to fuck children?

Do you think everybody gained the wherewithal at the same age as you or did some arrive there sooner or later ?

Generally, I don't advocate for things within the present "legal system" . While it can sometimes render a just decision, I don't think it has a basis in anything legitimate. So you're question isn't applicable to me. It's like asking a giraffe if the dress you're wearing makes your ass look fat.
 

Chezus

Well-Known Member
Do you think everybody gained the wherewithal at the same age as you or did some arrive there sooner or later ?

Generally, I don't advocate for things within the present "legal system" . While it can sometimes render a just decision, I don't think it has a basis in anything legitimate. So you're question isn't applicable to me. It's like asking a giraffe if the dress you're wearing makes your ass look fat.
No it is repeatedly asking you why YOU think it should be legal for adults to fuck children.
 

Rob Roy

Well-Known Member
No it is repeatedly asking you why YOU think it should be legal for adults to fuck children.

I think people who fuck others who haven't and / or can't consent are doing it wrong. I also think people who prevent other people from doing something which isn't harmful to them if they have the capacity to consent are doing it wrong.

Which part of that do you disagree with and why, Prohibitionist ?
 

Rob Roy

Well-Known Member
So now you avoid the question because you see how it makes you look. Why do you think a 12 year old can consent.

The way you've presented that question seems as though you are seeking some kind of absolute and universal answer to what I think is the age that people gain the capacity to consent. I don't think there is one and I think the younger they are the less likely they have the capacity.

If something makes me feel uncomfortable about another persons behavior when do I have a right to make them stop it ?
 

srh88

Well-Known Member
No it is repeatedly asking you why YOU think it should be legal for adults to fuck children.
Isn't it amazing? I've never seen anyone argue this until I met Robbie. I would love to see someone try to debate for fucking kids in public just to see how long they last
 

srh88

Well-Known Member
The way you've presented that question seems as though you are seeking some kind of absolute and universal answer to what I think is the age that people gain the capacity to consent. I don't think there is one and I think the younger they are the less likely they have the capacity.

If something makes me feel uncomfortable about another persons behavior when do I have a right to make them stop it ?
Well if a child's involved and you just walk away.. you're no better than the pedophile... you pedophile
 

Rob Roy

Well-Known Member
Isn't it amazing? I've never seen anyone argue this until I met Robbie. I would love to see someone try to debate for fucking kids in public just to see how long they last

That's a bad conflation right there.

I've only ever argued for this: People who have the wherewithal to consent to something which doesn't involve harming others should not be prohibited from exercising self determination. Whether you or I agree with the behavior is irrelevant.

If you disagree with what I said, you are making a PROHIBITIONIST argument on a pot website, no less. I await your on point and concise refutation.
 

Enigma

Well-Known Member
If I hear of a grown man so much as touching my fourteen year old niece inappropriately I'd kill him.
 

Rob Roy

Well-Known Member
Well if a child's involved and you just walk away.. you're no better than the pedophile... you pedophile

Tell that to Harry Truman, or LBJ or any other president who orders killed children, hypocrite. How many anti-war protests have you ever organized ?
 
Top