Cue the Censors; Twitter, Facebook, Google all censoring 'fake news' outlets

ttystikk

Well-Known Member
this thread is literally about facebook banning propaganda mills like infowars. and you crying about it because you rely on propaganda blogs and whatnot.
This thread is a deliberate discussion about censorship. I had no intention of it becoming a troll thread to expose you and your brainwashing crew as being against the freedom of speech, but you all showed up anyway.

And you all have the intellectual blindness to call US the triggered ones?

BWAHAHAHAHA!

You can't stand the thought of any information that you don't personally approve of.

Fascist. Go lick Netanyahu's balls.
 

greg nr

Well-Known Member
So in addition to your other charms, you gleefully support outright censorship of news and alternative media.
Technically and practically speaking, its not censorship. The sites like infowars and alternet are free to post whatever fiction they choose to dream up. To their own sites.

Any other independent site is still free to repost and aggregate them, within the bounds of copyright and authorized use of course.

But to say that it's censorship because google doesn't add that crap to their daily news stream is a perversion of the term.

Censorship is stopping someone from publishing something in any form. Shutting down infowars, or putting them behind a 100kbps link, would be censorship.

If you can print your news, and hand it out to anyone who will take it, you aren't being censored. If the washington post chooses to ignore it and not reprint it for you, that isn't censorship.
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
This thread is a deliberate discussion about censorship. I had no intention of it becoming a troll thread to expose you and your brainwashing crew as being against the freedom of speech, but you all showed up anyway.

And you all have the intellectual blindness to call US the triggered ones?

BWAHAHAHAHA!

You can't stand the thought of any information that you don't personally approve of.

Fascist. Go lick Netanyahu's balls.
make the case for why "hologram lizard jews did 9/11" should be featured next to actual news.
 

SneekyNinja

Well-Known Member
This thread is a deliberate discussion about censorship. I had no intention of it becoming a troll thread to expose you and your brainwashing crew as being against the freedom of speech, but you all showed up anyway.

And you all have the intellectual blindness to call US the triggered ones?

BWAHAHAHAHA!

You can't stand the thought of any information that you don't personally approve of.

Fascist. Go lick Netanyahu's balls.
make the case for why "hologram lizard jews did 9/11" should be featured next to actual news.
Notice they had to make the "You're a Jew!!!" reference?
 

ttystikk

Well-Known Member
Technically and practically speaking, its not censorship. The sites like infowars and alternet are free to post whatever fiction they choose to dream up. To their own sites.

Any other independent site is still free to repost and aggregate them, within the bounds of copyright and authorized use of course.

But to say that it's censorship because google doesn't add that crap to their daily news stream is a perversion of the term.

Censorship is stopping someone from publishing something in any form. Shutting down infowars, or putting them behind a 100kbps link, would be censorship.

If you can print your news, and hand it out to anyone who will take it, you aren't being censored. If the washington post chooses to ignore it and not reprint it for you, that isn't censorship.
If the world's largest information dissemination organizations single out sources because of their content and treat them differently, it's censorship.
 

ttystikk

Well-Known Member
yeah, bernietards are racist, bigoted, sexist, anti-semitic trash.
You must be desperate. That's a lot of name-calling in one shit post, even for you.

Fascist.

Establishment shill.

Apartheid supporter.

Intolerant.

Those are not 'names', they're accurate, descriptive labels.

What's amazing is that my views are really not so different from yours. Apparently just enough to be a terrible threat, for some reason. There's no other logical explanation. Or you are batshit crazy, that's an option.

What are you so afraid of that you have to attack me so viciously? You're more intolerant than the most rabid of right wingers. That says something significant. Apparently, your worldview or your cause is vulnerable.
 

ttystikk

Well-Known Member
Maybe you should embrace this change given that you're too dotarded to differentiate between fake news and real news.

I've 650 reasons why this is true.
List them.

And who are you to decide what's real or fake?

You can't even spit out an original thought.
 

ttystikk

Well-Known Member
Notice they had to make the "You're a Jew!!!" reference?
He's proud of it. Furthermore, he says that Palestinian rights aren't as good as Jewish rights in Israel. That makes it fair game.

Are you supporting his Zionist views? It sure sounds like it.
 

SneekyNinja

Well-Known Member
List them.

And who are you to decide what's real or fake?

You can't even spit out an original thought.
Lol.

That's the difference... I don't think I can just decide, something is either fact or it's not.

Dude you posted 2 or 3 fake news stories in a week, you're an embarrassment.

By all means, continue your stroke though.
 

ttystikk

Well-Known Member
Lol.

That's the difference... I don't think I can just decide, something is either fact or it's not.

Dude you posted 2 or 3 fake news stories in a week, you're an embarrassment.

By all means, continue your stroke though.
So far, you have yet to post one shred of evidence backing your claims.

But keep on name-calling like your Dear Leader, Buck the Fascist.
 

greg nr

Well-Known Member
If the world's largest information dissemination organizations single out sources because of their content and treat them differently, it's censorship.
No, it's editorial discretion. Only the lazy rely on google or especially, facebook. All of the sources you are so fearful about are freely available. All you have to do is visit them.

Every newspaper in the world picks and chooses it's content. That's not censorship.

If the government or some cartel tells them they can't cover something, or tells them what they can and can't say, that is censorship. It's no different in new media.
 

SneekyNinja

Well-Known Member
So far, you have yet to post one shred of evidence backing your claims.

But keep on name-calling like your Dear Leader, Buck the Fascist.
Lol, you fucking Bernie Cucks are all the same.

Everyone here remembers you posting multiple fake news threads in short succession yet you just lie about it just like the racist menopause Telesales Operator and the Virgin Duct Rape Anal Tape noob, and pretend it never happened.

Your credibility is as small as your intellect.
 

SneekyNinja

Well-Known Member
Anyone else notice that the same retards that were saying less than 2 weeks ago that they'd never give their personal details to Facebook are the ones now crying that Facebook wants to block the proliferation of fake news?
 

MarWan

Well-Known Member
make the case for why "hologram lizard jews did 9/11" should be featured next to actual news.


"Following 9/11, over 60 Israelis were detained either under the Patriot anti-Terrorism Act or for immigrations violations. Some of them were active Israeli military personnel. A number of them failed polygraph examinations when questioned for surveillance activities against the U.S. Some of them were found to have been spying on Arabs.

Five Dancing Israelis

Of the 90 or so detained Israelis there was a group of five Israelis, now widely known as the "dancing Israelis", who were spotted in multiple locations filming, and celebrating the attacks.


The men were detained by NYPD. The police and FBI field agents became very suspicious when they found maps of the city with certain places highlighted, box cutters (the same items that the hijackers supposedly used), $4700 cash stuffed in a sock, and foreign passports. Police also told the Bergen Record that bomb sniffing dogs were brought to the van and that they reacted as if they had smelled explosives. (#)


[URL='http://www.bollyn.com/middle-east-crisis#article_10558']Their names were Sivan & Paul Kurzberg, Yaron Schmuel, Oded Ellner & Omer Marmari.
[/URL]
[URL='http://www.bollyn.com/middle-east-crisis#article_10558'][/URL]
[URL='http://www.bollyn.com/middle-east-crisis#article_10558']"We are not your problem"?
According to [URL='http://abcnews.go.com/2020/story?id=123885&page=1']ABC News 20/20
, after the group of Israelis were detained, the driver of the van -- Sivan Kurzberg -- told the officers:
"We are Israeli. We are not your problem. Your problems are our problems. The Palestinians are the problem."

They later appeared on an Israeli talk show and claimed to be "documenting the event". Witnesses reported they were set up PRIOR to the first plane strike, and were seen congratulating one another afterward. The five jubilant Israelis were also seen photographing one another. The FBI seized and developed their photos, one of which shows Sivan Kurzberg flicking a cigarette lighter in front of the smoldering ruins in an apparently celebratory gesture."[/URL][/URL]
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member


"Following 9/11, over 60 Israelis were detained either under the Patriot anti-Terrorism Act or for immigrations violations. Some of them were active Israeli military personnel. A number of them failed polygraph examinations when questioned for surveillance activities against the U.S. Some of them were found to have been spying on Arabs.

Five Dancing Israelis

Of the 90 or so detained Israelis there was a group of five Israelis, now widely known as the "dancing Israelis", who were spotted in multiple locations filming, and celebrating the attacks.


The men were detained by NYPD. The police and FBI field agents became very suspicious when they found maps of the city with certain places highlighted, box cutters (the same items that the hijackers supposedly used), $4700 cash stuffed in a sock, and foreign passports. Police also told the Bergen Record that bomb sniffing dogs were brought to the van and that they reacted as if they had smelled explosives. (#)


Their names were Sivan & Paul Kurzberg, Yaron Schmuel, Oded Ellner & Omer Marmari.
"We are not your problem"?
According to
ABC News 20/20, after the group of Israelis were detained, the driver of the van -- Sivan Kurzberg -- told the officers:
"We are Israeli. We are not your problem. Your problems are our problems. The Palestinians are the problem."

They later appeared on an Israeli talk show and claimed to be "documenting the event". Witnesses reported they were set up PRIOR to the first plane strike, and were seen congratulating one another afterward. The five jubilant Israelis were also seen photographing one another. The FBI seized and developed their photos, one of which shows Sivan Kurzberg flicking a cigarette lighter in front of the smoldering ruins in an apparently celebratory gesture."
so jews did the holocaust to themselves and also 9/11'ed us?

jeez those jews are good
 
Top