former NPR CEO Ken stern.......

[Rob Roy]

pointing out that you oppose civil rights because you'll just "hate em more now" never gets old for me, you racist trailer trash.

So, if a black person didn't want to interact with a white person, while remaining on his own property and minding his own business, you'd sic white police on him to force him to serve someone? Sounds racist.

 

[Rob Roy]

I do no such thing, dumdum, but enjoying fellating that strawman.

Don't you get little pieces of hay pubes stuck in your mouth when you fellate a strawman?

 

[dagwood45431]

Don't you get little pieces of hay pubes stuck in your mouth when you fellate a strawman?

Only you would know, skidmark.

 

[Rob Roy]

yep, that's why they passed civil rights.

your case is so strong that you don't even need to complete rewrite history you pedophile bag of shit.

I see you avoided explaining why you would force a black person to serve a white person, even if the black person preferred to be left alone. Are you saying that could never happen under "civil rights" ?




Bag of shit!!??

 

[UncleBuck]

I see you avoided explaining why you would force a black person to serve a white person, even if the black person preferred to be left alone. Are you saying that could never happen under "civil rights" ?




Bag of shit!!??

yep, black people just wanted to be left alone and not forced to serve white people. that's why we have civil rights.

you win yet again and you didn't even have to flip history on its head.

 

[Rob Roy]

yep, black people just wanted to be left alone and not forced to serve white people. that's why we have civil rights.

you win yet again and you didn't even have to flip history on its head.

So, you think forcing black people to associate and serve white people, even if they don't want to, is a good policy and you endorse things that make that possible?

 

[Rob Roy]

Only you would know, skidmark.

 

[UncleBuck]

So, you think forcing black people to associate and serve white people, even if they don't want to, is a good policy and you endorse things that make that possible?

yep, that's exactly why they had to pass civil rights. black people just would not serve white people.

oh, and also the holocaust was perpetrated BY jews, not against them, and dogs domesticated humans.

 

[dagwood45431]

yep, that's exactly why they had to pass civil rights. black people just would not serve white people.

oh, and also the holocaust was perpetrated BY jews, not against them, and dogs domesticated humans.

Dumdum thinks that if he flips it by saying a black person shouldn't be forced to serve a white person, he can't be called out on his obvious racist leanings. In other words, he thinks we're as dumb as he is.

 

[Rob Roy]

No one is forcing anyone to do anything, shithead. We've been through this so many times even someone as goddamned stupid as you are should have gotten it by now. If you do not want to serve all, DO NOT OPEN A PUBLIC BUSINESS. If you do, YOU HAVE CHOSEN.

Your assertion is based in a belief which defaults to the idea that some people are more equal than others and have a right to threaten force against a person who hasn't threatened force against them.

The term "public business" is incongruent with what private property really is. It's not an accurate description and is a word created to imply that private property somehow falls under the domain of nonowners who threaten you if you don't act as if THEY own it. Can you refute that ? No, you can't.

 

[UncleBuck]

Dumdum thinks that if he flips it by saying a black person shouldn't be forced to serve a white person, he can't be called out on his obvious racist leanings. In other words, he thinks we're as dumb as he is.

what could possibly give black people more freedom than letting white people deny service to them though?

 

[Rob Roy]

yep, that's exactly why they had to pass civil rights. black people just would not serve white people.

oh, and also the holocaust was perpetrated BY jews, not against them, and dogs domesticated humans.

Yet, you STILL haven't told me where person A gets the right to make person B serve them or where they get the right to determine the use of another persons property if that person is leaving them alone.

Nice attempt at conflating the argument with holocausts and dogs Poopy Pants.


So you are afraid to answer ? Man, you're easy. No wonder why I win every time.

Why would you favor legislation which takes away a black persons right to determine the use of their body and their property ?

 

[Rob Roy]

what could possibly give black people more freedom than letting white people deny service to them though?

Oh that's an easy question.
Treating everyone equal and respecting their right to self determine the use of their OWN body and property is a good start.

Your ideas feature equal oppression for all races and you somehow think that provides freedom. You've swallowed a lot of government juice, figuratively speaking.

 

[UncleBuck]

Why would you favor legislation which takes away a black persons right to determine the use of their body and their property ?

i don't. i support civil rights.

before civil rights were passed, black people could not even travel freely because of racist white losers like you.

 

[Rob Roy]

i don't. i support civil rights.

before civil rights were passed, black people could not even travel freely because of racist white losers like you.

Well, isn't it true under "civil rights" a black person's right to determine the use of his own property and body is under threat if he didn't want to associate with a white person ? (the answer is yes) So you favor threatening black people legislatively ? (again, the answer is yes)

Are you saying a black person has no right to determine the use of his own property and his own body? (yes you are)

I'm not a racist white loser. Nor do I favor threatening black people with force if they won't associate with somebody I prefer them to. (You do though)

BTW - It's quite lopsided, I'm winning. (again)

 

[UncleBuck]

I'm not a racist white loser.

yes you are.

you oppose civil rights, which gave black people more freedom than any other piece of legislation since voting rights or the ending of slavery.

only racist white losers like you oppose civil rights.

 

[dagwood45431]

Your assertion is based in a belief which defaults to the idea that some people are more equal than others and have a right to threaten force against a person who hasn't threatened force against them.

No, it does not.

The term "public business" is incongruent with what private property really is.

No it is not.

You are defective.

 

[Rob Roy]

yes you are.

you oppose civil rights, which gave black people more freedom than any other piece of legislation since voting rights or the ending of slavery.

only racist white losers like you oppose civil rights.

How does forcing a person to use their body and property in ways they prefer not to, "give freedom" again?

I'm assuming you aren't going to rebut the fact that you favor legislation which potentially forces black people to serve white people and you concede that is your position ?

I'm not a racist loser, I'd never favor forcing any person to serve another person, why would you ?

 

[Rob Roy]

No, it does not.



No it is not.

You are defective.

So, "nuh uh" and a lame insult is your entire argument genius ?

If I'm defective, why can I articulate things and you stand around pissing your pants unable to explain why you think it's okay to threaten black people with force if they won't serve white people. Cat got your tongue, numbnuts ?

 

[dagwood45431]

So, "nuh uh" and a lame insult is your entire argument genius ?

Nope. This has all been explained to you by many, dumdum.