The Democratic Party Autopsy Report

[Rob Roy]

you are opposed to civil rights, a law passed because black people were refused service and given unequal treatment and less rights than white people.

don't try to rewrite history, klanman

maybe try telling us all about how you think 11 year old children can consent to sex with 35 year olds like roy moore you sick stupid backwards fuck

I am opposed to involuntary human interactions, so if a person hasn't consented or is incapable of consenting to something, they should be left alone.

Which is ironic, since you DON'T think mutual consent is a necessary ingredient in human interactions. Thanks for illustrating your cognitive dissonance once again.

 

[Unclebaldrick]

oh you're all caught up now? gonna take points being so slow.....

5/tin. barely passed, do better.

You are wrong retard. Deal with it.

 

[Rob Roy]

please name the location of this imaginary restaurant that someone was forced to open. i don't answer hypotheticals.

also, here is a question you have been avoiding for years: did the widespread denial of service to black people by white people cause harm to black people?

thanks, klanman.

@twostrokenut - be sure to defend him by attempting to rewrite history because you love to support racists and pedophiles. thanks.

Your question is a non sequitur. IF a person hasn't opened a restaurant how could they fall into this discussion?

WHEN a person owns property and others force them to use their property and their body to serve others against their will, THAT is when the inequality occurs. If you don't believe that, you don't think there is such a thing as property. Do you think there is such a thing as property or not ?

 

[Rob Roy]

Who has the right to force another person into an unwanted relationship if that person is leaving the other alone?

Uncle Buck is afraid of this question. Very afraid.

 

[PCXV]

FAIL. black people retained all rights before civil rights. government does not grant rights.

You have proven yourself a retarded troll with this post. Kys.

 

[PCXV]

This is a common misconception, but of course you cannot elucidate this argument. Repeat it as if that made it so, yes, elucidate, no.

I am in favor of ALL PEOPLE HAVING THE RIGHT to control themselves / their own property, but not others. You are not.

Damn right I'm not. I believe in limited rights, fairness, order, and peace. When white racists own those private roads and they declare no blacks can drive on them, then what? Black people can't cross town, to shop, to go to the bank, to see family, and you say that's OK because whites own the land? Your ideals are complete horse shit. Worth even less than horse shit.

By allowing rampant, arbitrary discrimination you are inviting conflict, not preventing it.

 

[dagwood45431]

You believe a "justice system" can exist when the deciders have personal immunity and when they forcibly prevent competition ?

Wait. What? You believe a profit motive should be driving criminal justice in the US? Tell me more! LMFAO!

 

[dagwood45431]

Erroneous conclusion Poopy Pants. If I were racist I would champion one race being superior, having more right etc. I don't.

Nobody here with an average IQ doesn't understand that this is all a charade devised to hide that fact that you can't stand co-existing with black people. You are a racist jackass and a complete coward.

 

[PCXV]

lol welcome to my retarded thoughts.

FIFY

 

[Rob Roy]

Damn right I'm not. I believe in limited rights, fairness, order, and peace. When white racists own those private roads and they declare no blacks can drive on them, then what? Black people can't cross town, to shop, to go to the bank, to see family, and you say that's OK because whites own the land? Your ideals are complete horse shit. Worth even less than horse shit.

How can you believe in peace if you also think it is okay to force one person to serve another ?

 

[SneekyNinja]

welcome to politics. are you implying I misquoted your buddy when he said black people had no rights before 1964?

Not rights that were recognised, no.

You know that's what he meant, I know that's what he meant and everyone else knows that's what he meant but you decided to be retarded and try to play word games.

 

[dagwood45431]

So, you're ready to answer my 5 questions now ?

No. I've been through this tedium with you enough already. Own your racism, coward. You fool no one.

 

[Rob Roy]

Nobody here with an average IQ doesn't understand that this is all a charade devised to hide that fact that you can't stand co-existing with black people. You are a racist jackass and a complete coward.

Except I think black people have every right to self determine, everyone does, which sort of renders what you said ridiculous.

 

[twostrokenut]

how is segregation a "free market principle"?

your euphemisms and history denial are fucking pathetic, holocaust denier.

segregation was a Democrat principle. a law.

 

[PCXV]

How can you believe in peace if you also think it is okay to force one person to serve another ?

Because peace requires compromise. We aren't talking rape and murder, we are talking about how to go about funding roads that literally every person has a right to use, on land that is unavoidable to get to key areas; we are talking about serving someone you may not want to associate with a sandwich or a cake, you don't have to marry them.

Enforcing basic tolerance and civil rights is a legitimate way to mitigate conflict. Allowing rampant petty and arbitrary discrimination causes real harm and damages entire communities. Forcing someone to serve a black person a sandwich literally harms nobody.

 

[UncleBuck]

Your question is a non sequitur. IF a person hasn't opened a restaurant how could they fall into this discussion?

WHEN a person owns property and others force them to use their property and their body to serve others against their will, THAT is when the inequality occurs. If you don't believe that, you don't think there is such a thing as property. Do you think there is such a thing as property or not ?

here is a question you have been avoiding for years: did the widespread denial of service to black people by white people cause harm to black people?

 

[dagwood45431]

are you asking how would we pay for warfare and welfare without income taxes dear?

So, fire departments are "warfare" or "welfare"? Derp.

I'm talking about all of it, dumdum.

 

[Rob Roy]

Damn right I'm not. I believe in limited rights, fairness, order, and peace. When white racists own those private roads and they declare no blacks can drive on them, then what? Black people can't cross town, to shop, to go to the bank, to see family, and you say that's OK because whites own the land? Your ideals are complete horse shit. Worth even less than horse shit.

By allowing rampant, arbitrary discrimination you are inviting conflict, not preventing it.

By forcing an association on an involuntary basis, you aren't inviting conflict, you are ENGAGING in it.

 

[UncleBuck]

I think black people have every right to self determine.

unless they want to eat lunch at the same counter as a white.

 

[UncleBuck]

segregation was a Democrat principle. a law.

southern democrats and republicans opposed civil rights. northern democrats and republicans voted for it.

and your home state turned ruby red once a democrat signed civil rights into law.

sucks that you can't just rewrite history with your neo-confederate revisionism, eh?

cuck shill