Serva
Well-Known Member
What you mean? English isn‘t my mother tounge, and I don‘t get the sentence!
What I wanted to say, is what you pointed out in a better language than me! That‘s my guess...
New style Samsung LM561C Board
- Thread starter chuckduck
- Start date
What I wanted to say, is what you pointed out in a better language than me! That‘s my guess...
Serva
Well-Known Member
http://msue.anr.msu.edu/news/green_light_is_it_important_for_plant_growth
Maybe read a little more, before spreading miss informations. My point in this forum is, I shut my mouth, if I don‘t know something... but that‘s just my attitude!
see4
Well-Known Member
Afaik means, as far as I know. I was not attempting to spread misinformation, that's why I said, afaik.
The link you provided shows that I'm "partially correct". And that it does reflect green light.
CobKits
Well-Known Member
as far as i understand it, in a given CRI the only difference between color temps is thickness of phosphor
different CRIs use different chemistry in the phosphor layer
see4
Well-Known Member
Which is what robin may have concluded as well. I'd simply like to experiment it for myself. My premise is that I will see a benefit in using a mix of 3000k and 4000k that I would not get in using just 3500k.
Prawn Connery
Well-Known Member
As I was writing, you were already posting what I wanted to say - so you beat me to it!What you mean? English isn‘t my mother tounge, and I don‘t get the sentence!
What I wanted to say, is what you pointed out in a better language than me! That‘s my guess...
Prawn Connery
Well-Known Member
Yes, that's what I was trying to say. Same phosphor, different thickness - so there should be very little difference in mixing diodes of different CCT ratings (3000 + 4000) compared to the average (2x 3500).
ANC
Well-Known Member
I once caught a tilapia where the river meets the ocean in Kleinmond. Saltwater, anyway I brought it home and it lived out its life with my other tilapias.
Prawn Connery
Well-Known Member
Well I'm assuming you "know" what you posted: "The majority of green light is useful in photosynthesis".
see4
Well-Known Member
It literally says the exact opposite.
Well I'm assuming you "know" what you posted: "The majority of green light is useful in photosynthesis".
ANC
Well-Known Member
This my friend. Do your experiment then report back a comparison grow. Don't assume the results will be what you think and proclaim it as fact before the time.
Serva
Well-Known Member
Do you compare them side by side? Otherwise you can‘t see a difference at all, no?
Serva
Well-Known Member
Oh... you came here pretty much trying to beat everyone. Your attitude wasn‘t: „hey guys, I like do do an experiment“
see4
Well-Known Member
That's my plan. One tent with 3000k + 4000k diodes, another with just 3500k diodes, and another with HPS with relatively same watts at the wall.
see4
Well-Known Member
Not true at all. At no point in time was I trying to "beat everyone". You are misinterpreting and likely conflating my comments.
Prawn Connery
Well-Known Member
I'm assuming you can read what you posted.
^ That's exactly what is written in your post. I'm not sure how you rationalise that it says the exact opposite of what it actually says! LOL!
Serva
Well-Known Member
Come one... you could have googled, if my statement was correct, and come back here saying: thanks for the information, I DIDN‘T KNOW that!
Instead you said, green light isn‘t effecting the plant, because it‘s reflected. And the article pointed out that most green light is used, not reflected!
Serva
Well-Known Member
Don‘t you realize, that you are „fighting“ with like everyone else here in this thread for the last 3 pages? It‘s all about the attitude, and how we present ourself. Not about the intention behind...
Prawn Connery
Well-Known Member
I think it's "Opposite Day" today!
Sorry, but I guess there's no real point in arguing with someone who interprets everything everyone writes as the complete opposite of what they're trying to convey . . .