Lesson #1 in parenting in Virginia

Was this an appropriate punishment?

  • Yes, the kid is cured

    Votes: 8 57.1%
  • No, it was cruel to post it on Facebook

    Votes: 5 35.7%
  • Maybe, if that fucked up father seeks help for subjecting his kid to ridicule.

    Votes: 1 7.1%

  • Total voters
    14

Rob Roy

Well-Known Member
no one forced you to sign a contract obligating you to pay property taxes you fucking pedophile
So owning shelter means you have to pay other people money or they might kill you, but there is no force involved?

You've been sniffing glue again haven't you?
 

ttystikk

Well-Known Member
So owning shelter means you have to pay other people money or they might kill you, but there is no force involved?

You've been sniffing glue again haven't you?
It means you're obligated to help support the society that gives you the chance to have safe and secure shelter with all the services included.

You constantly whine about the fact that you can't get something for nothing. YOU benefited (at least a little; clearly the education you were offered didn't take), where do you get off thinking you shouldn't have to pay it forward if you want to participate in the advantages of society?
 

Rob Roy

Well-Known Member
Yeah we all know your dad was a real POS. The question is why would you want to carry on any of his racist ways ?
Aren't you the guy that wants to disarm some black people who have guns you don't approve of ?

Damn, first you think it's okay to order black people to serve other people on their own property and face government guns if they fail to comply no less, and now you want to take away their right to chose what they can own too?
 

ttystikk

Well-Known Member
Aren't you the guy that wants to disarm some black people who have guns you don't approve of ?

Damn, first you think it's okay to order black people to serve other people on their own property and face government guns if they fail to comply no less, and now you want to take away their right to chose what they can own too?
Listen to what he says, don't watch what he does.
 

londonfog

Well-Known Member
Aren't you the guy that wants to disarm some black people who have guns you don't approve of ?

Damn, first you think it's okay to order black people to serve other people on their own property and face government guns if they fail to comply no less, and now you want to take away their right to chose what they can own too?
Oh now you have went to being a misleading liar. I tried to have a decent convo. Let the fun begin.
Tell us again how you think a 12 year old can consent to sex with a 30 year old ?
 

Rob Roy

Well-Known Member
It means you're obligated to help support the society that gives you the chance to have safe and secure shelter with all the services included.

You constantly whine about the fact that you can't get something for nothing. YOU benefited (at least a little; clearly the education you were offered didn't take), where do you get off thinking you shouldn't have to pay it forward if you want to participate in the advantages of society?
It is impossible to create an obligation for another person against their will if they are peaceful and not minding your business for you. That isn't an obligation you think you're enforcing, it's a threat you are delivering. You should learn the difference between the two.

You seek to justify your actions by trying to rationalize what you'd like people to do as something that people MUST do, they are two different things.

I do constantly whine, but not in the way you stated. I don't whine for something for nothing, that's not a valid argument.

I won't get into it, but I do many things for other people, by my choice. I would never threaten you into joining me though if you didn't, if I did I would be wrong. like you are now.
 

Rob Roy

Well-Known Member
Oh now you have went to being a misleading liar. I tried to have a decent convo. Let the fun begin.
Tell us again how you think a 12 year old can consent to sex with a 30 year old ?
So you wouldn't be seeking to deprive some black people of things they like, but you dislike ? I think you would be.

Do we really have to do the Pedo routine again tonite honey? I got a headache.
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
It is impossible to create an obligation for another person against their will if they are peaceful and not minding your business for you. That isn't an obligation you think you're enforcing, it's a threat you are delivering. You should learn the difference between the two.

You seek to justify your actions by trying to rationalize what you'd like people to do as something that people MUST do, they are two different things.

I do constantly whine, but not in the way you stated. I don't whine for something for nothing, that's not a valid argument.

I won't get into it, but I do many things for other people, by my choice. I would never threaten you into joining me though if you didn't, if I did I would be wrong. like you are now.
please stop spamming our forum
 

londonfog

Well-Known Member
So you wouldn't be seeking to deprive some black people of things they like, but you dislike ? I think you would be.

Do we really have to do the Pedo routine again tonite honey? I got a headache.
why the unnecessary adding of "black people ". They could be pink like yourself and I still see zero need to have a weapon that can fire 30 rounds in under 7 seconds. The same reasoning why I don't want ANYONE just having a stinger or M107.
Have you changed your views on a 12 year old consenting to sex with an adult ?
 

Rob Roy

Well-Known Member
why the unnecessary adding of "black people ". They could be pink like yourself and I still see zero need to have a weapon that can fire 30 rounds in under 7 seconds. The same reasoning why I don't want ANYONE just having a stinger or M107.
Have you changed your views on a 12 year old consenting to sex with an adult ?
So now you go from trying to run black peoples lives for them, to trying to run everyone's life for them?

What is it with you guys who are jealous of people who have a larger gun than you do?
 

Flowki

Well-Known Member
So owning shelter means you have to pay other people money or they might kill you, but there is no force involved?

You've been sniffing glue again haven't you?
I understand what you are getting at, really. But what's the alternative?, having no shelter and some nut jobs group killing you because they enjoy it?, hopefully before they sodomize your wife and kids so you don't have to watch. Meanwhile in civilization you might have to pull over and give a cop some details. Such a violation of your rights.

Civilization is far from perfect but the alternative only works if very few people are doing it, like those out in Canada. If many people are living out in the wild or self sufficiently you run more risk of serious confrontation, fighting over resource and you have 0 protection to a well organized raid group. If you group up for protection then guess what that is the seed of?.

If I am on the wrong path here then I have mistaken your angle. Do you want to live in society yet never do anything you dislike?. Again, forget this idea that you have rights in any scenario.. you'll be far better off. The very concept of rights is derived from authoritative physical action watered down to the threat of it once civilized, in order to not dissolve back into dog eat dog. That concept is the core of humanity's success as it allows farmers to farm with less chance of being raided, raped and butchered.

Rights are not an empowerment, they are a shackle for darker desires.
 
Last edited:

Rob Roy

Well-Known Member
I understand what you are getting at, really. But what's the alternative?, having no shelter and some nut job group killing you because they enjoy it?, hopefully before they sodomize your wife and kids so you don't have to watch. Meanwhile in civilization you might have to pull over and give a cop some details. Such a violation of your rights.

Civilization is far from perfect but the alternative only works if very few people are doing it, like those out in Canada. If many people are living out in the wild or self sufficiently you run more risk of serious confrontation, fighting over resource and you have 0 protection to a well organized raid group. If you group up for protection then guess what that is the seed of?.

If I am on the wrong path here then I have mistaken your angle. Do you want to live in society yet never do anything you dislike?. Again, forget this idea that you have rights in any scenario.. you'll be far better off.

I want to live free and peacefully. I recognize that is the most basic human right there is. I try to run my own life according to that philosophy, which means you should be able to run yours that way too. It doesn't create a "system" , nor prevent others from creating their own or joining with their friends to voluntarily have the one they want to have.

If you are really interested in the concept, you might enjoy reading about this here. The section on fundamentals is a good place to start.

http://voluntaryist.com/
 

Flowki

Well-Known Member
I want to live free and peacefully. I recognize that is the most basic human right there is. I try to run my own life according to that philosophy, which means you should be able to run yours that way too. It doesn't create a "system" , nor prevent others from creating their own or joining with their friends to voluntarily have the one they want to have.

If you are really interested in the concept, you might enjoy reading about this here. The section on fundamentals is a good place to start.

http://voluntaryist.com/
You are truly missing the point. You don't have any human rights.. it is a human made concept that only works if you sign up to a civilized mind set. Do you think a serial killer thinks you have rights?...

The idea of human rights being an empowerment is why the soft left are so fucking dangerous. For example people think they have the right to walk out into a zebra crossing (a uk traffic thing). Many people walk out and don't check the traffic because ''it's their right to cross'' (wrong even on a factual level). A lot of people have been killed that way.
 
Last edited:

zeddd

Well-Known Member
Not saying what you wrote is incorrect but it has a very significant chance of being so. What you have described, after non-factually stating his reason was a lie is the Hollywood movie psychologist version of why the son done what he done. Seeking power is what humans do, children are no different. To not seek power is something you are educated out of, or at least educated to redirect it into what we consider constructive power, while arguably those definitions are not definitively correct. A bully does not require an abusive home life, it is simply one of many reasons why it happens.

Your stereo type of how the rest of the world views Trump-Americans, It would have been less of a stereo type to suggest how ''the rest of the world'' views ''all'' Americans, as counter intuitive as that may seem to you.
Are you trying to sound intelligent with “stereo type”. I don’t watch movies or tv so don’t understand your reference to “Hollywood movie psychologist” what do you mean exactly?
 

Flowki

Well-Known Member
Are you trying to sound intelligent with “stereo type”. I don’t watch movies or tv so don’t understand your reference to “Hollywood movie psychologist” what do you mean exactly?
Using ''Stereo type'' to sound intelligent?, I must be smarter than I think.

The reason you stated why a bully becomes a bully is as cliche as it gets so forgive me for flagging that as a lack of understanding on that matter, I'm not saying you are generally stupid by that, at all. Why it matters is that many reasons behind bullying exist, to automatically assume it's the parents fault is irresponsible. It leads to lack of accountability for other party's at blame because parents fault.

You were quick to judge the father when you know very little about the situation. Even if he is going about it the wrong way, the fact he is trying to keep his child in line is a good start.

Putting it on Facebook is bad?. That is the reality of western civilization now. You know full well more and more people are uploading their lives, every aspect of it. If this were 20 year ago when uploading random content was not so prevalent this would have been child abuse had it been a single video out of context to the current society's use of internet space.

That is not the fathers doing, that is face book and society collectively. They created this new cult of constant inside access and many of us indulged in it.
 
Last edited:

zeddd

Well-Known Member
Using ''Stereo type'' to sound intelligent?, I must be smarter than I think.

The reason you stated why a bully becomes a bully is as cliche as it gets so forgive me for flagging that as a lack of understanding on that matter, I'm not saying you are generally stupid by that, at all. Why it matters is that many reasons behind bullying exist, to automatically assume it's the parents fault is irresponsible. It leads to lack of accountability for other party's at blame because parents fault.

You were quick to judge the father when you know very little about the situation. Even if he is going about it the wrong way, the fact he is trying to keep his child in line is a good start.

Putting it on Facebook is bad?. That is the reality of western civilization now. You know full well more and more people are uploading their lives, every aspect of it. If this were 20 year ago when uploading random content was not so prevalent this would have been child abuse had it been a single video out of context to the current society's use of internet space.

That is not the fathers doing, that is face book and society collectively. They created this new cult of constant inside access and many of us indulged in it.
Sorry to read you think it’s ok to humiliate children and post it on fb so random strangers can laugh at them.
 

Flowki

Well-Known Member
Sorry to read you think it’s ok to humiliate children and post it on fb so random strangers can laugh at them.
So in other words you've had your views destroyed, instead of contemplating and evolving as a human you are going to shut the conversation down with a self proclaimed (big word sorry) in factual victory statement to save your ego.
 

zeddd

Well-Known Member
So in other words you've had your views destroyed, instead of contemplating and evolving as a human you are going to shut the conversation down with a self proclaimed (big word sorry) in factual victory statement to save your ego.
Why do you think it’s ok to post this on social media and invite strangers to laugh at his child?
 

Rob Roy

Well-Known Member
You are truly missing the point. You don't have any human rights.. it is a human made concept that only works if you sign up to a civilized mind set. Do you think a serial killer thinks you have rights?...

The idea of human rights being an empowerment is why the soft left are so fucking dangerous. For example people think they have the right to walk out into a zebra crossing (a uk traffic thing). Many people walk out and don't check the traffic because ''it's their right to cross'' (wrong even on a factual level). A lot of people have been killed that way.
Which kind of human interactions would you say are more civilized the kind that arise between mutually consenting people / voluntary relationships or the kind that arise when there is an involuntary aspect and an element of force involved?
 
Top